22.06.2015 Views

SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo

SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo

SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 Wing Thickness<br />

The effect of wing thickness on the performance of the aircraft was studied so that the optimum<br />

thickness could be chosen. Initially a wing thickness of 3% of the chord was chosen based on<br />

existing supercruising aircraft. Increasing the root thickness of the wing was considered to<br />

reduce the weight of the wing. The effects of wing root thickness on wing weight, cross sectional<br />

area, and fuel consumption were studied. The weight of the wing was estimated using the<br />

method presented in Raymer, and the additional cross sectional area was calculated numerically.<br />

The resulting wing weights and cross sectional areas for wing root thicknesses from 3% to 6%<br />

are shown in Figure 5.4. The effect of the resulting weights and cross sectional areas on the fuel<br />

consumption during the mission were estimated using the same method used for the wing sizing.<br />

The results in Figure 5.5 show that the larger cross section of a thicker wing root adds more<br />

wave drag than the induced drag savings from the reduced wing weight. Based on this result, a<br />

constant wing thickness of 3% was chosen.<br />

8,500<br />

8,000<br />

t root = 3%<br />

Weight of Wing (lb)<br />

7,500<br />

7,000<br />

t root = 4%<br />

t root = 5%<br />

6,500<br />

t root = 6%<br />

6,000<br />

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22<br />

Maximum Frontal Cross Sectional Area of Wing (ft 2 )<br />

Figure 5.4 - Effect of Root Chord Thickness on Wing Weight and Cross Sectional Area<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!