Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for Aircraft ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix B Page B-7 Name Reference Found In [Gerold] Gerold, A. (2001). Runway Incursion: The Threat on the Ground, Avionics Magazine, April 2001, Potomac, MD. [Graeber] Graeber, D.A., and Andre, A.D., (1999). In R.S. Jensen, B. Cox, J.D. Callister, & R. Lavis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology: 2, 791-796. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University. [Hemm] Hemm, Robert; and Shapiro, Gerald (1999). “Airborne Information for Lateral Spacing (AILS) Benefit Estimate,” NS906S1, Logistics Management Institute, McLean, VA. [Higgins] Higgins, M. K. (1994). Evidence for Parallel Approach Blunders in the National Airspace Incident Monitoring System (NAIMS). Mitre Paper 94W0000076, The MITRE Corporation Center for Advanced Aviation System Development, McLean, VA. [High-Density] EUROCONTROL document entitled “High-Density 2015 European Traffic Distributions for Simulation,” dated August 17, 1999 [Hull] “The Mystery Airplane”, by John R. Hull in AOPA Pilot Magazine, November 1999. (Mr. Hull was formerly the manager of the San Diego FSDO). [ICAO ATM] ATM Operational Concept Document", Appendix to AN-Conf/11-WP/4, ICAO, September 2003. See www.icao.org/icao/en/anb/meetings/anconf11/index.html [Jackson] Jackson, Mike R.; Samanant, Paul; and Haissig, Christine M. (2000). “Design and Analysis of Airborne Alerting Algorithms for Closely Spaced Parallel Approaches”, AIAA-00-37118. [Jensen] Jensen, D. (2001). Pilots, Toss Away Your Black Flight Bags, Avionics Magazine, April 2001, p. 39-40, Potomac, MD. [Kelley] Kelley, D. R., Steinbacher, J. G. (1993). Pilot Surface Incident Safety Study. MITRE Paper 92W0000116, The MITRE Corporation Center for Advanced Aviation System Development, McLean, VA. [Knuth 1981] Knuth, Donald, 1981, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol II / Seminumerical Algorithms, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA. [Koczo] Koczo, Steve (1996). “Coordinated Parallel Runway Approaches,” NASA CR- 201611, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA. [Kuchar] Kuchar, James K.; and Carpenter, Brenda D. (1997). “Airborne Collision Alerting Logic for Closely Spaced Parallel Approach,” Air Traffic Control Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–127. F E ©20xx, RTCA, Inc. J J D J J E E,F D J J
Appendix B Page B-8 Name Reference Found In [Lankford] Lankford, David N.; McCartor, Gerry; Yates, James; Ladecky, Shahar; and Templeton, Donna (2000). “Comparative Study of Airborne Information for Lateral Spacing (AILS) System with Precision Runway Monitoring (PRM) System”, DOT-FAAAFS- 420-83. [Lasswell] Lasswell and Wickens (1995). The effects of display location and dimensionality on taxiway navigation. ARL-95-5/NASA-95-2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation Research Laboratory, Savoy, IL. [Lilliefor 1967] Lilliefors, Hubert W., 1967 “On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, V62, (318), pp 399-402. [Magyartis] Magyarits, Sherri M.; Ozmore, Richard E. (May 2002). “Evaluation of Triple Independent Instrument Landing System Approaches to Runways Spaced 4,000 ft and 5,300 ft Apart Using A Precision Runway Monitor System”, DOT/FAA/CT-TN02/16, FAA ACB-330 Report. [MIT 1996a] 3.0, Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC. MIT Lincoln Laboratory (1996a). Operational Concept for Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) as an Aid to Visual Acquisition, Draft. Prepared for RTCA SC-186 WG-3, [MIT 1998b] MIT Lincoln Laboratory (1996b). Traffic Information Service (TIS) Operational Concept, Draft, Prepared for RTCA SC-169, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA. [MITRE 2001] Bone, R., Olmos, O., and Mundra. (2001). Paired Approach: A Closely Spaced Parallel Runway Approach Concept. MITRE Paper 01W0000046, The MITRE Corporation Center for Advanced Aviation System Development, McLean, VA. [Moore] Moore, S. M. (1997). Comparison of alerted and visually acquired airborne aircraft in a complex air traffic environment, Society of Automotive Engineers, 98ASC-32, Warrendale, PA. [Mundra 1990] Mundra, A. D., and Buck, W. W. (1990). "The Need for Multiple VFR Approach Concepts," The Journal of Air Traffic Control. January-March, Arlington, VA. [Mundra 1993] Mundra, A. D., Cieplak, J. J., Domino, D. D., and Peppard K. (1993). "Enhancing Visual Approaches with the TCAS Traffic Display," Proceedings of the Air Traffic Control Association Annual Meeting, Fall 1993, Nashville, TN. [Mundra 1998] Mundra, A. D., Cieplak, J. J., Domino, D. A., Olmos, B. O., and Stassen, H. P. (1998). Potential ADS-B/CDTI Capabilities for Near-Term Deployment, MITRE Paper 98W0000004, The MITRE Corporation Center for Advanced Aviation System Development, McLean, VA. © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. J E D J C C J C G G C
Page 1 and 2:
1150 18 th Street, NW, Suite 910 Wa
Page 3 and 4:
FOREWORD This document was prepared
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PURPOSE AND SCO
Page 7 and 8:
3.3.23 Selected Heading Sign Field.
Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF TABLES Table 2-5: High Leve
Page 11:
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Page 14 and 15:
2 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. C: Derivation
Page 16 and 17:
4 1.2.3 ASA Architecture © 20xx, R
Page 18 and 19:
6 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. The TCAS traf
Page 20 and 21:
8 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. DO-3xx ADS-B
Page 22 and 23:
10 1.3.1.4 Basic Surface Situationa
Page 24 and 25:
12 2 Operational Requirements 2.1 G
Page 26 and 27:
14 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. timeliness,
Page 28 and 29:
16 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Table 2-6: R
Page 30 and 31:
18 2. FAA TSO-C195 states applicati
Page 32 and 33:
20 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Notes for Ta
Page 34 and 35:
22 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. • Optimiza
Page 36 and 37:
24 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. same approac
Page 38 and 39:
26 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. may allow de
Page 40 and 41:
28 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. An aircraft
Page 42 and 43:
30 Information ↓ Initial Acquisit
Page 44 and 45:
32 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. NRA - 3 NM E
Page 46 and 47:
34 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Aircraft typ
Page 48 and 49:
36 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. This Page In
Page 50 and 51:
38 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. In Figure 3.
Page 52 and 53:
40 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Figure 3.1.1
Page 54 and 55:
42 3.1.1.1.3 Functional Level © 20
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
46 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Table 3.1.1.
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
50 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Figure 3-8 i
Page 64 and 65:
52 USER AIR INTERFACE © 20xx, RTCA
Page 66 and 67:
54 3.1.4.2.1.4 ADS-R in Enroute and
Page 68 and 69:
56 TIS‐B Non‐Equipped © 20xx,
Page 70 and 71:
58 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. available fo
Page 72 and 73:
60 3.2.2 Identification 3.2.2.1 Cal
Page 74 and 75:
62 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. i. Lighter-t
Page 76 and 77:
64 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. The ADS-B po
Page 78 and 79:
66 3.2.4.2 Altitude © 20xx, RTCA,
Page 80 and 81:
68 3.2.7 Heading © 20xx, RTCA, Inc
Page 82 and 83:
70 3.2.8.7 Other Capability Codes
Page 84 and 85:
72 SDA Value (decimal) (binary) 0 0
Page 86 and 87:
74 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Table 3.2.9.
Page 88 and 89:
76 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. 5. RC < 0.3
Page 90 and 91:
78 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Table 3.2.12
Page 92 and 93:
80 3.2.16 Geometric Vertical Accura
Page 94 and 95:
82 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Note: Users
Page 96 and 97:
84 3.2.24 Selected Heading Field ©
Page 98 and 99:
86 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. a. The ADS-B
Page 100 and 101:
88 3.4.1.1 Definitions © 20xx, RTC
Page 102 and 103:
90 Source Info Category Information
Page 104 and 105:
92 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. 5. Required
Page 106 and 107:
94 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. ASSAP shall
Page 108 and 109:
96 3.4.2.2 Latency 3.4.2.3 Integrit
Page 110 and 111:
98 3.4.2.11 Suitability of Traffic
Page 112 and 113:
100 3.4.3.1 ADS-B Surveillance Cove
Page 114 and 115:
102 © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. required to
Page 116 and 117:
104 Equipage Class ↓ B0 Aircraft
Page 118 and 119:
© 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Table 3.4.3.3.1
Page 120 and 121:
© 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Notes for Table
Page 122 and 123:
Operational Domain → © 20xx, RTC
Page 124 and 125:
© 20xx, RTCA, Inc. 2. Future versi
Page 126 and 127:
© 20xx, RTCA, Inc. • Report time
Page 128 and 129:
3.5.1.2 ADS-B Message Exchange Tech
Page 130 and 131:
Notes: © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. 1. It is
Page 132 and 133:
© 20xx, RTCA, Inc. • Ground Spee
Page 134 and 135:
© 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Note: The recom
Page 136 and 137:
3.5.1.3.12 Heading While on the Sur
Page 138 and 139: 3.5.1.4 Mode Status Report © 20xx,
Page 140 and 141: © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. 3. These elemen
Page 142 and 143: 3.5.1.4.9 Capability Class (CC) Cod
Page 144 and 145: 3.5.1.4.15 Geometric Vertical Accur
Page 146 and 147: 3.5.1.6.2 ARV Report Update Require
Page 148 and 149: © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. The higher “s
Page 150 and 151: © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Whereas ADS-B r
Page 152 and 153: 4 ADS-B IN System Applications Requ
Page 154 and 155: © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. Broadcast (ADS-
Page 156 and 157: © 20xx, RTCA, Inc. This Page Inten
Page 158 and 159: This page intentionally left blank.
Page 160 and 161: Appendix A Page A-2 ©20xx, RTCA, I
Page 166 and 167: Appendix A Page A-8 A.2 Definitions
Page 168 and 169: Appendix A Page A-10 Air/Ground Sta
Page 170 and 171: Appendix A Page A-12 Collision Avoi
Page 172 and 173: Appendix A Page A-14 Extended Displ
Page 174 and 175: Appendix A Page A-16 Latency Compen
Page 176 and 177: Appendix A Page A-18 Regime - Divis
Page 178 and 179: Appendix A Page A-20 TCAS Potential
Page 180 and 181: Appendix B Bibliography
Page 182 and 183: B Bibliography Appendix B Page B-1
Page 184 and 185: Appendix B Page B-3 Name Reference
show all

Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for Aircraft ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?