10.07.2015 Views

Directional Recording of Swell from Distant Storms - Department of ...

Directional Recording of Swell from Distant Storms - Department of ...

Directional Recording of Swell from Distant Storms - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DIRECTIONAL RECORDING OF SWELL FROM DISTANT STORMS 567where c = phase velocity, and W = wind speed. Actually 2,B varies <strong>from</strong> about 600 to about1500, so there is a factor flfx <strong>of</strong> between 4 and 10 to take spreading into account, dependingon c/W.(c) AttenuationAt frequencies above 50 c/ks the observed ridge values deviate <strong>from</strong> Darbyshire's curves.We interpret this departure as the result <strong>of</strong> attenuation. The break-<strong>of</strong>f point is remarkablysharp in most cases, thus indicating that attenuation is negligible below 50 c/ks and predominantabove 60 c/ks. The result is <strong>of</strong> interest inasmuch as our observations refer to themost distant sources yet investigated. Clearly it would be preferable to measure the attenuationdirectly <strong>from</strong> a comparison <strong>of</strong> associated ridge cuts at various distance, A; for the timebeing we shall have to be content with inferring the attenuation <strong>from</strong> a comparison <strong>of</strong> thepredicted spectrum near the source and the observed spectrum at a distance.Empirical knowledge concerning attenuation is virtually non-existent. Darbyshire(1952, p. 320) suggests a relation0-27 =fla aO gto account for attenuation in the Atlantic; here ao is the amplitude at the source, and athe amplitude after the waves have travelled for a time t.For small attenuation, /Ia < 1; for large attenuation fla I 1. Set = 4 x 105 S. f = 0.05 c/sand 2a2= E(f) Af - 1 cm2(c/ks) - (5 c/ks)= 5cm2 for the case <strong>of</strong> small attenuation. Thisgives /Ia = 0*04, so that the attenuation is small, as expected. We expect the attenuationto be large for t = 4 x105 S, f = 0.07 c/s, 1a2 20 cm2 (c/ks)-1 (Sc/ks) 100 cm2; thesevalues give /Ia = 0-5. The conclusion is that the onset <strong>of</strong> appreciable attenuation as indicatedon figure 40 is not out <strong>of</strong> line with previous experience.14. MEAN MONTHLY SPECTRAAverage monthly spectra with great statistical reliability are plotted on figure 41. Thenumber <strong>of</strong> daily spectra comprising the monthly means and the degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom, v, <strong>of</strong> thecombined spectra are as follows:May June Aug. Sept. Oct.record days 12 13 18 23 16v 640 710 990 1250 880The proportional variance is 2/v, and the 95 % uncertainty limits are roughly 1 ? 1(8/v).The most remarkable feature is the flatness <strong>of</strong> the spectrum at low frequencies, resemblingthe output <strong>of</strong> a 'white-noise' generator. There is always the suspicion that this might be anoise level introduced into the recording or analysis and therefore carry no geophysicalsignificance. However, the following evidence indicates the low-frequency portion <strong>of</strong> thespectra to be real: (i) at the high-frequency limit the raw spectrum <strong>of</strong> bottom pressure islower by an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude than it is in the flat portion; (ii) previous analyses to frequenciesas low as 0 3 c/ks, with the use <strong>of</strong> specially designed low-frequency instruments,gave results consistent with the present analyses (Snodgrass et al. I962); (iii) the coherencebetween different instruments is high at the low-frequency limit (figure 4).69-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!