BF-FieldManual-FEB13 -3.pdf - Bertelsmann Foundation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

20Castle, S. (17 September, 2011). Meetings on European Debt Crisis End in Debate, but Little Progress. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/business/global/meetings-on-european-debt-crisis-end-in-debate-but-little-progress.html21Chon, J. (2012). US Lessons for the Eurozone: Restoring Confidence through Transparency.(issue brief). The Bertelsmann Foundation. Retrieved from:http://www.bfna.org/publication/us-lessons-for-the-eurozone-restoring-confidence-through-transparency22Cave, T. (2 September, 2012). EU Mulls European Jobs Act to Ease Capital Access. Marketwatch. Retrieved from: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/eu-mulls-european-jobs-act-to-ease-capital-access-2012-09-0223Kollatz-Ahnen, M. (September 2012). A Growth Programme for Europe. (policy analysis). p. 13. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Retrieved from: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipa/09306.pdfMEMO ON POST-AFGHANISTAN NATO1See Chicago Summit Declaration. (20 May, 2012). Retrieved from: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_87593.htm2As of 8 October 2012, ISAF still has 104,905 troops in Afghanistan, representing fifty different countries. For the exact breakdown by country, seeInternational Security Assistance Force (ISAF): Key Facts and Figures. Retrieved from: http://www.nato.int/isaf/docu/epub/pdf/placemat.pdf3Current plans see a force of 228,500 for the ANSF, with an estimated annual budget of $4.1 billion. Fact Sheet. (21 May, 2012). See White HouseOffice of the Press Secretary (21 May, 2012). Fact Sheet: Chicago Summit- Sufficient and Sustainable ANSF. (press release). Retrieved from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/21/fact-sheet-chicago-summit-sufficient-and-sustainable-ansf4NATO’s toppling of the Gaddafi regime proved controversial since the UN resolution 1973 (2011), retrieved from http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sc10200.doc.htm, adopted by the Security Council on 17th March 2011, had only authorized the use of force to protect civilians.5The Future of NATO: Bad Timing. (31 March 2012). The Economist. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/node/21551491; NATO’s Sea of Troubles.(31 March 2012). The Economist. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/node/215514646“Green-on-blue” attacks (using the military code in which blue refers to friendly forces and green to neutral forces) by ANSF troops against ISAFsoldiers have significantly increased in the last two years, leading to the suspension of certain joint ISAF-ANSF training missions and combatoperations. Starr B. (17 September 2012). US restricts Afghan operations after ‘green-on-blue’ killings. CNN. Retrieved from: http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/17/world/meast/us-afghanistan-attacks/index.html7Sperling, J. and Webber, M. (2009). NATO: From Kosovo to Kabul. International Affairs, 85(3), p.508.8Sheridan, M. B. and Wilson, S. (19 March 2011). US actions in Libya may speak louder than words. Washington Post. Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/us-actions-may-speak-louder-than words/2011/03/19/ABVWsZx_story.html9Labbot, E. (18 May 2012). NATO’s post-Afghanistan future unclear. CNN. Retrieved from: http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/18/natos-postafghanistan-future-unclear/10US Department of Defense. (5 January, 2012). Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense. Retrieved from: http://www.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf11NATO’s Sea of Troubles. The Economist; see Grissom, A. (July 2012), The United States, in The Implications of Military Spending Cuts for NATO’s LargestMembers. (Analysis Paper). Ed. by Clara Marina O’Donnell, Brookings Institution. Retrieved from: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/7/military%20spending%20nato%20odonnell/military%20spending%20nato%20odonnell%20pdf, p.25. Even after the withdrawal of forcesfrom Germany, about half of American troops stationed abroad will be located in Europe.12Gienger, V. (4 February, 2012). Panetta Pledges Troops for NATO Response Force to Assure Europe. Bloomberg. Retrieved from: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-04/panetta-pledges-troops-for-nato-response-force-to-assure-europe.html13See Krepinevich Jr., A. (2012). Strategy in a Time of Austerity. Foreign Affairs, 91(6), pp. 58-69.14O’Donnell, C. M. (6 July, 2012). Are Europeans a Better Transatlantic Security Partner than Meets the Eye? Brookings Institution (Opinion). Retrievedfrom: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2012/07/06-security-partner-odonnell15Gates, R. (10 June, 2011). The Security and Defense Agenda (Future of NATO). (speech). Retrieved from: http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=158116Murphy, J. (10 November, 2011). A future for UK and NATO defense. NATO Source (weblog post). Retrieved from: http://www.acus.org/natosource/future-uk-and-nato-defense17Molling, C. (July 2012). Trends within the European Union, in The Implications of Military Spending Cuts for NATO’s Largest Members. (Analysis Paper).Ed. by Clara Marina O’Donnell, Brookings Institution. Retrieved from: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/7/military%20spending%20nato%20odonnell/military%20spending%20nato%20odonnell%20pdf, pp.6-718Burns N., Lightfoot, J. and Wilson, D. (14 May, 2012). Anchoring the Alliance. Atlantic Council. Retrieved from: http://www.acus.org/files/publication_pdfs/403/051412_ACUS_Burns_AnchoringAlliance.pdf19Dorman, A. (July 2012). The United Kingdom. in The Implications of Military Spending Cuts for NATO’s Largest Members. (Analysis Paper). Ed. by ClaraMarina O’Donnell, Brookings Institution. Retrieved from: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/7/military%20spending%20nato%20odonnell/military%20spending%20nato%20odonnell%20pdf, pp.10-12. The UK’s October 2010 Strategic Defense Review decided to scrapwith immediate effect its existing aircraft carrier. Two new vessels will be built, but the first one will not be fully operational before 2020 at the veryleast.8 0Citations
20See Giegerich, B. (July 2012). Germany. in The Implications of Military Spending Cuts for NATO’s Largest Members. (Analysis Paper). Ed. by Clara MarinaO’Donnell, Brookings Institution. Retrieved from: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/7/military%20spending%20nato%20odonnell/military%20spending%20nato%20odonnell%20pdf, pp.15-18.21See Keller, P. (2012). Germany in NATO: the Status Quo Ally. Survival, 54(3). pp.95-110.22Germany plans Afghan-Mediterranean AWACS shuffle. (23 March, 2011). Reuters. Retrieved from: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/23/germanylibya-awacs-idAFLDE72M07E2011032323Schockenhoff, A. and Kiesewetter, R. (30 May, 2012). Strengthening Europe’s ability to act in the area of security policy. German Bundestag. Retrievedfrom: http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_7120-1442-1-30.pdf?12070923354924Future of Europe Group. (17 September, 2012). Final Report of the Future of Europe Group of the Foreign Ministers of Austria, Belgium, Denmark,France, Italy, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, and Spain. Retrieved from: http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/626338/publicationFile/171844/120918-Abschlussbericht-Zukunftsgruppe.pdf;jsessionid=71BFAE417B998C52A15B480A78298BE325France ended its combat mission in Afghanistan on 20 November. See France ends Afghan combat mission early. (20 November 2012). BBC News.Retrieved from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20417134.26Financial and Economic Data Relating to NATO Defence. (13 April, 2012). NATO Press Release (PR/CP, 047-REV1). Retrieved from: http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2012_04/20120413_PR_CP_2012_047_rev1.pdf27Pawlak, P. and O’Donnell, C. (9 July, 2012). Are Europeans a better transatlantic security partner than meets the eye? (weblog post). Centre forEuropean Reform. Retrieved from: http://centreforeuropeanreform.blogspot.fr/2012/07/are-europeans-better-transatlantic.html28Faleg, G. and Giovannini, A. (May 2012). The EU between Pooling & Sharing and Smart Defence: Making a virtue of necessity? Pp.11-20. Centre forEuropean Policy Studies (special report number 61). Retrieved from: http://www.ceps.eu/book/eu-between-pooling-sharing-and-smart-defence-makingvirtue-necessity29O’Donnell, C. M. (12 July, 2012). Integrating the EU Defence Market: An Easy Way to Soften the Impact of Military Spending Cuts? BrookingsInstitution. Retrieved from: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2012/07/12-eu-defense-odonnell30Rettman, A. (16 November, 2012). Five EU countries call for new military ‘structure’. EU Observer. Retrieved from: http://euobserver.com/defence/11822631For more, see Buckley, E. and Volker, K. (February 2010). NATO Reform and decision-making. Atlantic Council (Strategic Advisors Group issue brief).Retrieved from: http://www.acus.org/publication/nato-reform-and-decision-making32Michel, L. (2003). NATO Decision-making: Au Revoir to the Consensus Rule? Institute for National Strategic Studies/National Defense University (StrategicForum number 202). Retrieved from: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/sf202.pdf33See The Washington NATO Project. Alliance Reborn; Valasek, T. (July 2011). What Libya says about the future of the transatlantic alliance. Centre forEuropean Reform (essay). Retrieved from: http://www.cer.org.uk/publications/archive/essay/2011/what-libya-says-about-future-transatlantic-alliance34See Kupchan, C. (10 May, 2012). NATO: Chicago and Beyond. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, 2nd Session, 112th Congress(prepared statement). Retrieved from: http://www.cfr.org/nato/nato-chicago-beyond/p2820435See Valasek, T. and Korski, D. (December 2009). Closer NATO-EU Ties: Ideas for the Strategic Concept. Retrieved from: http://transatlantic.sais-jhu.edu/transatlantic-topics/Articles/nato/Closer_NATO-EU_Ties_Valasek_Korski.pdf; Lindley-French, J. (13 November 2008). The Future of NATO-EURelations. New Atlanticist (weblog post). Retrieved from: http://www.acus.org/new_atlanticist/future-nato-eu-relations36See the Field Manual Chapter on Russia for more details.37See Kupchan, R. (10 May, 2012). NATO: Chicago and Beyond. Prepared Statement before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. UnitedStates Senate, 2nd Session, 112th Congress (testimony). Retrieved from: http://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Charles_Kupchan_Testimony1.pdf;and Slaughter, A.-M. (5 June, 2012). Two NATOs in One. WE-NATO (weblog post). Retrieved from: http://we-nato.org/2012/06/05/two-natos-in-one/38See the Field Manual chapter on cybersecurity for more details.39Sorel, M. (14 May, 2012). NATO’s Cyber Security Strategy: A Good Start, But Much to Do. Chicago Council on Global Affairs (commentary). Retrievedfrom: http://2012summits.org/commentaries/detail/sorel_240Idem.41McGee, J. (8 July, 2011). NATO and Cyber Defense: A Brief Overview and Recent Events. CSIS (weblog post). Retrieved from: http://csis.org/blog/nato-and-cyber-defense-brief-overview-and-recent-events. Article 4 states that “the parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any ofthem, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened”.42Kramer, F. (March 2012). Transatlantic Nations and Global Security: Pivoting and Partnerships. Atlantic Council. Retrieved from: http://www.acus.org/files/publication_pdfs/403/031912_ACUS_Kramer_TransatlanticNations.PDF43Shea, J. (April 2012). Keeping NATO Relevant. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (policy outlook). Retrieved from: http://carnegieendowment.org/2012/04/19/keeping-nato-relevant/acl9#.44Ruhle, M. (5 June, 2012). NATO and Energy Security. Atlantic Council (transcript) Retrieved from: http://www.acus.org/event/nato-and-energy-securityreadout-chicago/transcriptCitations 8 1
Page 3:
Field Manual to EuropeIntroduction
Page 6:
multilateral channels. Europeanshav
Page 9 and 10:
JuneBritish presidency of UNSCJune
Page 12 and 13:
US-EU Investment vs. Global Nationa
Page 14 and 15:
economic conditions in the eurozone
Page 17 and 18:
MEMO ONTHE EUROZONE CRISISThe State
Page 19 and 20:
attitude toward moral hazard. Withw
Page 21 and 22:
Greece: 2010 Bailout BreakdownGreec
Page 23 and 24:
the deficit from 4.5 percent to thr
Page 27 and 28:
NATO thus faces an uncertain future
Page 29 and 30: 1. Consider NATO’s defensespendin
Page 31 and 32: of-area operations and worldwidepar
Page 33 and 34: concurrent terrorist attack in Beng
Page 35: 2. Strengthen regionalpartnerships
Page 38 and 39: MEMO ONCOUNTERTERRORISM ANDHOMELAND
Page 40 and 41: home affairs (JHA), particularly in
Page 43 and 44: Status of EU Countries in the US Vi
Page 45 and 46: offensive capability centered at NA
Page 47 and 48: socialized, i.e. there is a tacit e
Page 49 and 50: such technology, such as deep packe
Page 51 and 52: MEMO ONENERGY & CLIMATE CHANGEThe S
Page 54 and 55: identifying the agents most qualifi
Page 56 and 57: MEMO ONTURKEYThe State of PlayTurke
Page 58 and 59: as a rising regional and internatio
Page 60 and 61: CASE STUDY: TURKEY’S ENERGY ROLE:
Page 62 and 63: 22%12%Turkey’s Main Trading Partn
Page 64 and 65: MEMO ONRUSSIAThe State of PlayIn Pr
Page 66 and 67: EU-Russia security apparatus. Themo
Page 68 and 69: greater market access for US busine
Page 70 and 71: MEMO ONCHINAThe State of PlayIn 201
Page 72 and 73: But China’s competitive meridian
Page 74 and 75: in millions of USDUS-China Bilatera
Page 76 and 77: 7 6Acknowledgements
Page 78 and 79: CITATIONSINTRODUCTION1See “Confid
Page 82 and 83: ARAB UPRISING1Koch, C. (summer 2011
Page 84 and 85: COUNTERTERRORISM & HOMELAND SECURIT
Page 86 and 87: 21Healey, J. (January 2012). Beyond
Page 88 and 89: 20Berlemont, I. (25 July, 2012). Fr
Page 90 and 91: 24Putin, V. (6 September, 2012). An
Page 92: Bertelsmann Foundation1101 New York
show all

BF-FieldManual-FEB13 -3.pdf - Bertelsmann Foundation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?