10.07.2015 Views

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 11. De<strong>te</strong>rmining relationshipsIn<strong>te</strong>rventions initia<strong>te</strong>d from a MāoriperspectiveIn<strong>te</strong>rventions initia<strong>te</strong>d from a Wes<strong>te</strong>rnperspectiveWho are you and how will we worktogether?The relationship de<strong>te</strong>rmines how wewill engage with the in<strong>te</strong>rventionDe<strong>te</strong>rmined by our connections witheach otherWhat is the problem and how can Ifix it?The sys<strong>te</strong>m (in<strong>te</strong>rvention) de<strong>te</strong>rmineshow we will engage in therelationshipsDe<strong>te</strong>rmined by expertise, wealth andpositionFrom a Māori perspective it is largely understood that time spent developing relationships willde<strong>te</strong>rmine how effective the uptake and participation of Māori will be at all other points.Wes<strong>te</strong>rn sys<strong>te</strong>ms are domina<strong>te</strong>d by hierarchical roles and structures where power relations areof<strong>te</strong>n de<strong>te</strong>rmined by race, ethnicity, gender, age, class and cultural and social capital. Leaders in suchorganizations are reluctant to challenge the power of the status quo, even though these sys<strong>te</strong>ms arefailing, because it is within these structures that they obtain their position and power. As a result peoplein Wes<strong>te</strong>rn sys<strong>te</strong>ms, even those who might espouse personal values contrary to the mainstream political,ideological and cultural values, are stuck in unproductive ways of creating relationships relative toin<strong>te</strong>rventions.Table 22. Setting the agendaIn<strong>te</strong>rventions initia<strong>te</strong>d from a MāoriperspectiveIn<strong>te</strong>rventions initia<strong>te</strong>d from a Wes<strong>te</strong>rnperspectiveGrows out of and is driven by therelationshipsKawa [marae protocol] and tikanga[custom] support the agendaFocused on po<strong>te</strong>ntialRoles and responsibilities arecollaboratively de<strong>te</strong>rminedGrows out of and is driven by theresourceBounded by rules and regulationsFocused on the problemDesigna<strong>te</strong>d roles and responsibilitiesFrom a Māori perspective the agenda is driven by the relationships that have been developed.When time is prioritised to develop effective relationships and networks, cultural protocols emergewherein professional and personal roles and responsibilities are collaboratively and effectivelyde<strong>te</strong>rmined.Wes<strong>te</strong>rn agendas are of<strong>te</strong>n set without questioning the status quo because the power of thedominant consciousness renders any contrary worldview/perspective as unrealistic and impractical.While the pōwhiri serves as a metaphor for addressing in<strong>te</strong>rventions from a <strong>traditional</strong> Māoriperspective, Wes<strong>te</strong>rn meetings can serve as a metaphor for how people opera<strong>te</strong> in these sys<strong>te</strong>ms. Atmeetings, people are divided between their personal and professional self, with the professional roledominating relations and the personal self rendered invisible and undervalued. People are seen asreplaceable parts of the sys<strong>te</strong>m and are valued based on their efficiency. Their roles are viewed in a silorather than as a contribution to the whole.136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!