10.07.2015 Views

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

continues to receive Touch funding for Māori development through SPARC (Sport andRecreation NZ).The most significant achievement by Māori Touch NZ and Touch NZ (TNZ) was theestablishment of a partnership agreement in 2004, based on the well-being of the game and therecognition of the importance of both organizations. The agreement contains the followingaspects:the importance of the well-being of the game of Touch in Ao<strong>te</strong>aroa/New Zealand;access by Māori Touch NZ to TNZ <strong>te</strong>chnical resources (including expertise);the individual player (if selec<strong>te</strong>d) has the right to sta<strong>te</strong> his/her eligibility for eitherorganization;TNZ reserves the first right of selection of players;Māori Touch NZ selections are only made at Māori Touch Tournaments;TNZ recognizes and supports the Māori Touch NZ Tournament da<strong>te</strong>;TNZ supports Māori Touch NZ membership to FIT (Federation of In<strong>te</strong>rnational Touch); andparticipation in World Cup events and in in<strong>te</strong>rnational competition.The partnership agreement is not always successful in bridging the divide that the partnership,by nature, seeks to address. This is because, despi<strong>te</strong> being a binding document, it relies ongoodwill from both parties in order to be implemen<strong>te</strong>d. So, rather than focusing at adocument/policy level, one could argue that, at the very core of partnership models inAo<strong>te</strong>aroa/New Zealand, the Treaty of Waitangi challenges the notion of partnership at aconstitutional level.Figure 2. Treaty of Waitangi House model. Adap<strong>te</strong>d from Royal, 1998.This model promo<strong>te</strong>s the creation of distinct spaces in which the cultures―one represen<strong>te</strong>d asMāori and the other represen<strong>te</strong>d by the Crown―can naturally evolve in their own way. The modelalso outlines the principles, guidelines and conditions in which these two discre<strong>te</strong> “houses” canin<strong>te</strong>ract with one another to give rise to the “Treaty of Waitangi House” (Royal, 1998).The model can be applied to any area of New Zealand society. With respect to the<strong>knowledge</strong> industry (if it can be referred in this way), the “Tikanga Pākehā House”represents that range of institutions devo<strong>te</strong>d to the perpetuation of the <strong>knowledge</strong>, traditionsand <strong>knowledge</strong> agendas of the Crown. These would include universities, mainstreamschools, the Ministry and Foundation for Research, Science and Technology and manymore. Those institutions which fulfill the “Tikanga Māori House” are kōhanga reo [Māorilanguage preschool], kura kaupapa Māori [school based on Māori philosophy and use ofMāori language], whare wānanga [Māori <strong>te</strong>rtiary institution] and others. The range of“Tikanga Māori Houses” is growing. (Royal, 1998)In respect to the game of Touch, the partnership model proposed by Māori Touch NZresembles closely the Treaty of Waitangi House, as shown by this next diagram.223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!