10.07.2015 Views

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

traditional knowledge conference 2008 te tatau pounamu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ConclusionCurrent research and educational practices of<strong>te</strong>n opera<strong>te</strong> within a pat<strong>te</strong>rn of power imbalances thatfavour cultural deficit explanations or victim blaming of indigenous students’ and their families’educational performance and achievement (Shields, Bishop & Masawi, 2005). The particular modes ofthinking and acting that have defined much research such as this are concepts such as neutrality,objectivity and distance that emerge from examining participants rather than examining therelationships and in<strong>te</strong>ractions between and amongst people. Education, for example, is perceived as aprocess of shaping individuals within a sys<strong>te</strong>m rather than as Sidorkin (2002) suggests shaping con<strong>te</strong>xtsof relations that include the individuals. Indeed, building relationships is the work as it constitu<strong>te</strong>s howwe learn best and allows students from a range of cultural backgrounds to in<strong>te</strong>ract and learn in moreproductive ways. In line with Sidorkin (2002) this research continues to show us that the sort ofrelationships we build with people provides the basis for how we are able to engage with them. Just asin cultural rituals of encoun<strong>te</strong>r <strong>te</strong>achers cannot truly know what their relationships with students are likewithout first ensuring con<strong>te</strong>xts where students themselves can bring their own prior experiences to theirlearning. Positioning ourselves and thus living and learning within the culture itself, has providedholistic and flexible metaphors to guide us in this respect (Bishop et al., 2003; Berryman, <strong>2008</strong>).For non-Māori, pōwhiri of<strong>te</strong>n require a shift in mind set away from the familiar ways in which weintroduce ourselves in non-Māori spaces to a respectful sense of these new cultural spaces. There havebeen very public instances of resistance, animosity, anger, frustration and panic by Māori and non-Māori alike when it has been expec<strong>te</strong>d that people can move out of their cultural comfort zone and actaccording to different cultural protocols. However, on participation, many have found the experience tobe both worthwhile and rewarding, finding the experience useful in focusing on the little they know orunderstand about how different a Māori worldview is from a Wes<strong>te</strong>rn worldview. For many, theexperience has provided the first s<strong>te</strong>ps to identifying their own cultural identity. For others these are thefirst s<strong>te</strong>ps on a journey of learning to work respectfully within another worldview (Māori) in ways thatare relational to and in<strong>te</strong>rdependent with Māori but also self-de<strong>te</strong>rmining for Māori.Glossaryakohapūhongihuihunaongaiwikaumātuakaupapa Māorikaupapa whakaarokawakotahitangamanuhirimaraemokopunanoaPākehāpakekepōwhirirangatahirangatirataitamarikitamariki mokopunatangata whenuataonga tuku ihotātau tātautikangatūpunalearn; <strong>te</strong>achsub-tribal kin grouppress noses in greetinggathering; meetingin-lawstribeeldersMāori philosopy; Māori way of doing thingstheorymarae protocolworking in unityvisitorsMāori communal centregrandchildrenfree from ritual restrictionNew Zealander of mainly European descentadultsformal rituals of encoun<strong>te</strong>ryoung adultsleadersadolescentsyounger children of both gendershostsvalues, beliefs, traditions, history, customs and ritualsthe concept of sharing propertycorrect procedure; customancestors139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!