radiolaria - Marum
radiolaria - Marum
radiolaria - Marum
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Radiolaria 14 Bibliography - 1993<br />
Kozur, H. & Mostler, H. 1993. Anisian to Middle<br />
Carnian <strong>radiolaria</strong>n zonation and description of some<br />
stratigraphically important <strong>radiolaria</strong>ns. Geol. Pälont. Mitt.<br />
Innsbruck, Sonderbd., 3, 39-199.<br />
Kruglikova, S.B. 1993. Observations on the distribution<br />
of polycystine Radiolaria in marine sediments (mainly at<br />
high taxonomic levels). In: Radiolaria of giant and subgiant<br />
fields in Asia. Nazarov Memorial Volume. (Blueford, J.R. &<br />
Murchey, B.L., Eds.), Micropaleontology, special<br />
Publication vol. 6. Micropaleontology Press, American<br />
Museum of Natural History, New York. pp. 17-21.<br />
Data on the ecology and distribution of modem <strong>radiolaria</strong>n<br />
species and higher taxonomic classification is poor. This paper<br />
reviews published data on the diversity of polycystine <strong>radiolaria</strong>n<br />
assemblages in different regions of the world's ocean and looks at<br />
the ecological distribution of high rank taxa.<br />
Kurimoto, C., Teraoka, Y. & Okamura, K. 1993.<br />
Cretaceous <strong>radiolaria</strong>ns from the Shimanto Belt of the Saiki<br />
area, Kyushu. N. Osaka Micropaleont. spec. Vol., 9, 233-<br />
247. (in Japanese)<br />
Kuwahara, K. 1993. Morphological change of late<br />
Permian Radiolaria Albaillella. N. Osaka Micropaleont. spec.<br />
Vol., 9, 35-40. (in Japanese)<br />
Lipman, R.K. 1993. Paleogene Radiolaria of North Eurasia<br />
and their implication for a global correlation. In: Radiolaria<br />
of giant and subgiant fields in Asia. Nazarov Memorial<br />
Volume. (Blueford, J.R. & Murchey, B.L., Eds.),<br />
Micropaleontology, special Publication vol. 6 .<br />
Micropaleontology Press, American Museum of Natural<br />
History, New York. pp. 94-97.<br />
Radiolarians can be useful in developing a global zonal<br />
stratigraphy of Paleogene marine deposits. In Paleogene deposits<br />
approximately 100 species of <strong>radiolaria</strong>ns are found that can be<br />
used to correlate strata from North Eurasia to other continents and<br />
other oceanic sediments. A correlation scheme of zonal division of<br />
Paleogene of the North Eurasia and oceanic troughs based on<br />
<strong>radiolaria</strong>ns is given and their correlation with zones based on<br />
foraminifers and nannoplankton. This article reviews the Paleogene<br />
<strong>radiolaria</strong>n stratigraphy used by Soviet researchers prior to 1990.<br />
Lipps, J.H. 1993. Fossil Prokaryotes and Protists. ,<br />
Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, 342 p.<br />
Fossil Prokaryotes and Protists is a textbook for an advanced<br />
paleontology course dealing with the morphology, systematics,<br />
distribution in time and space, and evolution of single-celled<br />
organisms, as represented in the fossil record. The book assumes a<br />
knowledge of the principles of paleontology or general biology, and<br />
students would be well advised to have taken an introductory course<br />
in paleontology, biology, botany, or zoology before using this book.<br />
No preceding course on systematic paleontology is necessary,<br />
because each group considered here is unique and unlike any of the<br />
multicellular animals or plants. An understanding of basic geology<br />
will be useful, although separate sections on biostratigraphy,<br />
paleoceanography, and paleoenvironments are included because that<br />
is the chief geologic use of most unicellular fossils.<br />
Traditionally, fossils of protists, although not usually those of<br />
prokaryotes, have been taught in courses called micropaleontology,<br />
but just as traditionally, these courses have covered any tiny fossils<br />
that require a microscope for study, including those of many<br />
invertebrate, vertebrate, and plant groups. Tiny fossils of higher<br />
plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates are excluded from this<br />
textbook in order to treat levels of biologic organization together<br />
rather than a particular technique of study. Both approaches have<br />
merit. Microfossils are found together in the same samples<br />
regardless of biologic origin, and the inclusion of the common fossils<br />
likely to be encountered in microscopic examination of samples in a<br />
single text book has some practical value. However, modern<br />
techniques for study of the very wide variety of microfossils are no<br />
longer simple, and nearly every group now requires special<br />
techniques. In addition, paleontology in general is making great<br />
advances by moving towards a more biologic interpretation of<br />
fossils, so textbook treatments of fossils should be usefully<br />
organized by systematic affinities. Fossil Prokaryotes and Protists<br />
does just that by including bacteria and single-celled algae and<br />
protozoa in a single volume. The multicellular invertebrate<br />
microfossils are considered in the companion textbook to this<br />
volume, Fossil Invertebrates, edited by Richard S. Board man, Alan H.<br />
Cheetham, and Albert J. Rowell, and also published by Blackwell<br />
- 99 -<br />
Scientific Publications in 1987. Vertebrate and plant fossils are<br />
considered in any of several modern textbooks.<br />
Some topics in the general field of paleontology have not yet<br />
had major impact on the study of fossil prokaryotes and protists.<br />
Cladistic analysis, for example, has not been applied to unicellular<br />
fossils in any major way, although the method is discussed in this<br />
book with the hope that it will be more widely applied by the next<br />
generation of protistan paleontologists. Molecular phylogeny has<br />
clarified relationships between large groups of prokaryotes and<br />
between some protists and other kingdoms, but these techniques<br />
have not been applied extensively enough to reveal information<br />
useful in the context of this book. So many of the more recent<br />
advances in general paleontology and evolutionary biology have<br />
great but unrealized potential in prokaryotic and protistan<br />
paleontology. Other entire fields are based solidly on unicellular<br />
fossils; for example, paleoceanography. While such topics are useful<br />
in a textbook on these fossils, in recent years they have grown so<br />
much that they too deserve and have textbooks and courses devoted<br />
exclusively to them. The specific goals, then, of Fossil Prokaryotes<br />
and Protists are:<br />
1 to provide an understanding of the fossil record of unicellular<br />
organisms;<br />
2 to provide an understanding of the important role these<br />
organisms have played in Earth and life history;<br />
3 to provide an understanding of the usefulness of these<br />
fossils in solving certain geologic problems;<br />
4 to include enough information about the biology, morphology,<br />
and relationships of prokaryote and protist fossils to enable<br />
students to enter the professional literature, to be conversant with<br />
specialists on each group, or to proceed to more advanced studies of<br />
these groups;<br />
5 to provide a summary of the morphology, systematic<br />
paleontology, biology, and paleontology of unicellular fossils<br />
sufficiently detailed that advanced students can recognize and<br />
develop geologic or biologic research problems in their own programs<br />
that can be addressed using these fossils, given advice from their<br />
professors about topics amenable to study at their institutions.<br />
The book is organized into two parts—one dealing with general<br />
aspects of fossil unicellular organisms, and another describing each<br />
major group. Fossil prokaryotes first appear in the fossil record 3.5<br />
billion years ago (Ga), and so they are close to the very origin of life<br />
on Earth. A single, brief chapter is included on the origin of life,<br />
constrained by reasonable geologic and biochemical evidence, in<br />
order to provide an understanding of how the first unicellular fossils<br />
themselves may have arisen. Another chapter deals with the<br />
problems peculiar to single-celled fossils, and a third covers their<br />
applications to geologic problems because protists play an essential<br />
role in modern geology. A brief evolutionary history of the<br />
prokaryotes and protists and their role in influencing Earth's history<br />
provides a summary in which to place succeeding chapters that deal<br />
with specific groups of organisms.<br />
The 11 major unicellular contributors to the fossil record are<br />
considered in detail in the second part, each written by practising<br />
experts. One or two groups that occur very sparsely in the fossil<br />
record, for example thecamoebians, are omitted. The chapters are<br />
organized similarly: an introduction, history of study, morphology<br />
and systematics, biology, paleobiology, biostratigraphy, and an<br />
evolutionary history of the group. The level of systematic treatment<br />
of each group varies depending on its diversity and complexity. All<br />
chapters include a short list of supplementary reading that can<br />
provide additional information for the students or instructor. The<br />
paleontology of unicellular organisms has grown so much in the past<br />
few decades that no individual can adequately deal with all groups.<br />
Well over 40000 technical papers have appeared on aspects of<br />
single-celled fossils in the last two decades alone. Multiauthored<br />
texts are now standard. This approach has the particular problem<br />
that chapters vary in treatment and style. Partly that cannot be<br />
avoided because each expert has made his or her own judgement<br />
about what material should be included within the objectives and<br />
outline for each chapter, and each has their own style. Even more<br />
important in this book, however, is that each group is quite variable<br />
in its complexity, its geologic or ecologic distribution, and in the<br />
knowledge accumulated about it. For example, foraminifera have<br />
been studied carefully for more than 150 years, have over 60000<br />
described benthic and planktic species, have perhaps as many as<br />
6000 workers in industrial and research institutions worldwide,<br />
range in age from Cambrian to Recent, and live in environments from<br />
fresh water to shallow water of all types, to the deep sea, and from<br />
polar to equatorial regions. Silicoflagellates, in contrast, have been<br />
intensively studied for less than 30 years, have a few hundred<br />
species at most, have a dozen or so workers worldwide, are wholly<br />
planktic in the surficial waters of the oceans, and range in age from<br />
the Cretaceous to the Recent. Naturally, foraminifera will be treated<br />
less inclusively than silicoflagellates, although more pages will be<br />
devoted to them. Such is the nature of paleontology.