radiolaria - Marum
radiolaria - Marum
radiolaria - Marum
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Radiolaria 14 Bibliography - 1990<br />
That applies to many aspects of life equally applies to<br />
architecture: although a building may be planned as perfectly as<br />
humanly possible, it will always feature a certain degree of selforganisation,<br />
self-generation and self-formation which cannot be<br />
prevented by the planners. This starts with the initial design sketch,<br />
continues through the building phase and ends in the utilisation of<br />
the building. The concept that a building can be totally planned is<br />
nowadays regarded as an unrealistic ideal.<br />
A different train of thought is, however, gaining in importance:<br />
if processes of self-generation and self-organisation are<br />
unavoidable, the designing architect should at least recognise and<br />
exploit them, if possible. Processes of self-generation, be it physical<br />
processes or the actions of the users of a building, may well produce<br />
better solutions than an individual designer/planner. The degree of<br />
self-generation and also of accidence can vary greatly in<br />
architecture and town planning. On the one hand we find completely<br />
unplanned self-forming networks of paths in spontaneously formed<br />
structures of settlements, while on the other hand we have the<br />
'perfectly' designed headquarters of a bank in which nothing is left<br />
to self-organisation or chance.<br />
Those experiments which began after the war and were in<br />
principle of a physical nature, should be regarded as part of the<br />
research into processes of self-generation. These experiments were<br />
looking for effective for-s for vaults, grid shells, cable and<br />
membrane structures such as tents and airhouses (pneumatics) by<br />
using chains, rubber threads, coil springs, soap film models as well<br />
as tulle fabric models. In 1961 the biologist HELMCKE pointed out to<br />
his fellow researchers and especially to architects that in biology<br />
processes of self-generation appear -in conjunction with genetically<br />
controlled reproduction- to play a part which cannot be ignored. He<br />
attempted to furnish proof of this theory by using the bubbly/foamy<br />
structures of diatom shells whose particular arrangement can<br />
evidently be explained only by self-organisation. He discovered that<br />
new findings in the fields of architecture (i.e.. lightweight building<br />
construction) and aeroplane construction could be used to explain<br />
this type of self-organisation.<br />
It was in fact the experimental results gained from the minimal<br />
surfaces of soap films and the experience gained with a number of<br />
buildings based on these experiments, which planed the way for the<br />
interpretation of forms, structures and textures found in living<br />
natures. It was mainly the processes of self-organisation of liquid<br />
droplets, bubbles and films which had to be applied to other fields. It<br />
was furthermore observed that fibre structures can form inside<br />
bubbles and that these structures are capable of hardening either by<br />
bonding of the fibres or by forming hard substances. It was also<br />
found that a different process of self-generation found in inanimate<br />
nature, i.e.. that of crystallisation, applies only rarely to living nature<br />
where it appears to disturb the production process of living<br />
organisms because the structural forms of the crystals<br />
fundamentally differ from that of bubbles and membranes. For this<br />
reason the siliceous skeletons of diatoms and Radiolaria are not<br />
crystalline but rather comparable to amorphous quartz or window<br />
glass with similar strength characteristics, although they are not the<br />
product of a hot melting process but rather the result of a cold<br />
process which we have been unable to emulate so far.<br />
HELMCKE's theory of the effect of self-generation not<br />
controlled by genetics, which was largely influenced by the study of<br />
HAECKEL's drawings and the publications by D'Arcy W. THOMPSON,<br />
proved very instructive to those familiar with membrane and net<br />
structures, tents, pneumatics and airhouses, and multibated their<br />
researches in which Klaus BACH participated intensively.<br />
It was shown that an infinitely large number forms can be<br />
explained by processes of selfgeneration which occur abiotically. To<br />
start with there is the self-organisation of bubbles in various<br />
numbers, sizes and internal pressures. If fibre structures are added<br />
to this and if these fibres are allowed to bond to each other or to be<br />
made rigid by hardening substances, any biological form can be<br />
explained. The result cannot be -and never has been- to declare our<br />
knowledge of genetically based production and reproduction and of<br />
the growth of organisms to be invalid. This knowledge is simply<br />
extended by the knowledge of abiotic processes of self-generation.<br />
It should be noted in passing that there are still biologists, even<br />
amongst <strong>radiolaria</strong>n researchers, who are not familiar with the full<br />
extent of the abiotic processes of self-generation in question -partly<br />
because these findings have been published only recently- and who<br />
continue to adhere to the opinion that the forms of the organisms<br />
and particularly the distinguishing features of the species are either<br />
exclusively or largely genetically predetermined and who regard the<br />
formation of Radiolaria as unequivocally genetically coded.<br />
In all the studies of the past years on which, among others,<br />
Klaus BACH reports in his dissertation, two questions have been of<br />
interest within IL and the Special Research Project 230:<br />
1. If a large number of forms, structures and natural objects<br />
can also be generated abiotically, where does genetic planning start<br />
without which the generation of species and the phenomenon of<br />
- 49 -<br />
inheritance cannot be explained? The initially hypothetical answer to<br />
this question was quickly found for the 'soft' organisms: If there are<br />
no hard components and the organisms consist only of closed soft<br />
vessels (pneumatics), the abiotically generated bubble forms are not<br />
sufficient to explain more complex organisms and one has to add the<br />
linking mechanisms of the fibrous nets in the membrane or the<br />
interior of the pneumatic as well as the processes of change and<br />
growth caused by the varying internal pressure. It is only at this<br />
point that the shape can be determined, and<br />
2. How did the skeletons consisting of hard substances form?<br />
In this area again there are only some ideas which may be regarded<br />
as a preliminary answer. There are still some insurmountable<br />
problems. The form-generating fibre skeletons of the soft organisms<br />
can be very fine and may consist only of elongated large molecules<br />
which are two-dimensionally or three-dimensionally linked and have<br />
an adequate tensile strength. Such molecules have not been fount<br />
to-date even by the use of electron microscopes. They can be<br />
recognised only by means of their effect on the shape of the objects.<br />
They can, however, be detected if they occur in the form of bundles.<br />
Such bundles have been verificated in large numbers (e.g.<br />
cytoskeletons).<br />
If the production of Radiolaria with hard skeletons initially<br />
requires a soft 'youth form' -such a form could hardly be caught or<br />
observed since it almost entirely consists of water the following<br />
strong suspicion emerges: the hard skeleton is merely the hardened<br />
bubble or the fibre net formed by the bubble which develops into a<br />
hard skeleton by the ingress of siliceous substance which<br />
subsequently hardens. From this we conclude that the "soft young<br />
skeleton" consisting of bubbles and fibres, is tensioned by the<br />
internal pressure. It can expand and grow. The subsequent hardening<br />
'freezes' the expanded or tensioned status. ~e also believe that the<br />
hardening of the siliceous mass in the cold state can be possible<br />
only in the presence of organic fibres. If the theory is correct -which<br />
ought to be assumed, not least because of the author's study the<br />
siliceous skeleton of Radiolaria (and diatoms) is identical to the soft<br />
'young' skeleton under tensile stress which cannot be observed. As<br />
shown by the more recent light microscopic images produced by<br />
KAGE's, the hard skeleton appears to be only a part of this young<br />
skeleton and is most frequently found in the interior of the living<br />
<strong>radiolaria</strong>n cell.<br />
What are the functions of the hard skeletons? So far we have<br />
not found any conclusive evidence. Perhaps the skeleton provides<br />
protection against predators making the Radiolaria unpalatable and<br />
not easily digestible. It should, however, be noted that the hard<br />
skeleton allows the internal pressure in the cell to be lowered and<br />
even to become negative, at least for a short period. KAGE's films on<br />
acantharia seem to suggest this. The partial vacuum may facilitate<br />
the ingestion of food and water. I hope that the book produced by the<br />
two authors will provide a basis for many discussions between<br />
architects, engineers and biologists, which will continue the theme of<br />
"form-generating processes".<br />
Hori, R. 1990. Lower Jurassic Radiolarian Zones of SW<br />
Japan. Trans. Proc. palaeont. Soc. Japan, n. Ser., 159, 562-<br />
586.<br />
Four Lower Jurassic <strong>radiolaria</strong>n assemblage-zones and four<br />
subzones are established on the basis of <strong>radiolaria</strong>n biostratigraphic<br />
data from the Inuyama and three other areas of SW Japan. These<br />
zones are as follows in ascending order: the Parahsuum simplum<br />
(divided into Subzone I to IV), Mesosaturnalis hexagonus (newly<br />
proposed), Parahsuum (?) grande and Hsuum hisuikyoense<br />
Assemblage-zones. These zones range in age from latest<br />
Triassic/earliest Jurassic (Rhaetian/Hettangian ?) to early Middle<br />
Jurassic (Bajocian). This age assignment is based on comparison<br />
with Early to Middle Jurassic <strong>radiolaria</strong>n biostratigraphy established<br />
in North America and Turkey.<br />
Ishiga, H. 1990a. Paleozoic <strong>radiolaria</strong>ns. In: Pre-<br />
Cretaceous Terranes of Japan. Publication of IGCP Project<br />
No. 224: Pre-Jurassic Evolution of Eastern Asia. (Ichikawa,<br />
K., Mizutani, S., Hara, I., Hada, S. & Yao, A., Eds.). IGCP<br />
Project 224, Osaka, Japan. pp. 285-295.<br />
Study of Paleozoic <strong>radiolaria</strong>ns, especially, late Carboniferous<br />
through Permian <strong>radiolaria</strong>n biostratigraphy of Japan has been much<br />
improved during these several years (see Ishiga, 1986b). However,<br />
reports on Middle to Early Paleozoic <strong>radiolaria</strong>ns have been less<br />
common in Japan, for rocks of those ages are restricted to narrow<br />
tectonic belts. This paper summarizes the recent results on the<br />
examination of Middle to Late Paleozoic <strong>radiolaria</strong>n biostratigraphy<br />
and provinciality of Late Permian <strong>radiolaria</strong>n assemblages in<br />
Southwest Japan.<br />
Ishiga, H. 1990b. Radiolarians from the Gympie Province,<br />
eastern Australia. In: Proceeding of the Pacific Rim Congres<br />
1990. Eds.), vol. 3. Aust. Inst. Min. Metal., pp. 187-189.