11.07.2015 Views

Dust Control Handbook for Industrial Minerals Mining and Processing

Dust Control Handbook for Industrial Minerals Mining and Processing

Dust Control Handbook for Industrial Minerals Mining and Processing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

outside all mineral processing plants, <strong>and</strong> the amount of dust-laden air ducted outside <strong>for</strong> thisapplication is minor in comparison to other sources.Safety IssuesAll personnel entering the cleaning booth must wear personal protective equipment, including anapproved fit-tested respirator with filters that are acceptable <strong>for</strong> the material being processed, <strong>and</strong>hearing <strong>and</strong> eye protection. In addition, based upon the Occupational Safety <strong>and</strong> HealthAdministration (OSHA) m<strong>and</strong>ated pressure regulation, the air pressure at the air spray manifoldmust be regulated to a maximum of 30 psi be<strong>for</strong>e being directed toward the individualper<strong>for</strong>ming the clothes cleaning process.EFFECTIVENESS OF CLOTHES CLEANING TECHNOLOGYDuring development, the new clothes cleaning technology was compared to both the MSHAapprovedvacuuming approach <strong>and</strong> a single h<strong>and</strong>held compressed air hose. In this testing,several 100-percent cotton <strong>and</strong> cotton/polyester blend type coveralls were soiled with limestonedust be<strong>for</strong>e the worker entered the clothes cleaning booth. Table 8.1 shows the three cleaningmethods, their effectiveness in cleaning dust off the two types of coveralls, <strong>and</strong> the time it tookthe worker to per<strong>for</strong>m the cleaning task. Clearly, the use of the clothes cleaning system wasmuch more effective at removing the dust than the other two approaches, <strong>and</strong> required only afraction of the time, 17 to 18 seconds compared to an average of 372 seconds <strong>for</strong> vacuuming <strong>and</strong>an average of 178 seconds <strong>for</strong> the h<strong>and</strong>held compressed air hose. Table 8.1 also shows that thepolyester/cotton blend coveralls were cleaned more effectively than the 100 percent cotton type.Figure 8.3 depicts a worker be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>and</strong> after entering the clothes cleaning booth.Cleaning methodTable 8.1. Amount of dust remaining on the coveralls after cleaning, <strong>and</strong> thecleaning time <strong>for</strong> 100 percent cotton <strong>and</strong> polyester/cotton blend coveralls<strong>Dust</strong>remaining oncoveralls,grams100% Cotton Polyester/Cotton blend<strong>Dust</strong>Cleaning time, remaining onseconds coveralls,gramsCleaning time,secondsVacuuming 63.1 398 45.5 346Air hose 68.8 183 48.4 173Clothes cleaning booth 42.3 17 21.9 18<strong>Control</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Secondary Sources 205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!