The Final Report - Malcolm Shabazz City High School, Madison WI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Decision Item #29: ELIMINATE TEACHER EMERITUS RETIREMENT PROGRAM (TERP)(cont.)Redundancies orAvailability of theService Elsewhere:Service Delivery:Teacher retirees already receive retirement benefits at retirement throughother programs. This additional benefit was intended to serve the District,not the teachers, through overall cost savings generated through teacherturnover. The current plan serves as an added teacher retirementbenefit, rather than a program benefiting the District through savings as aresult of early retirements. As a result, elimination of this program toteachers will be perceived as taking away a teacher benefit. It is not clearwhether teachers will feel inclined to seek employment at another schooldistrict as a direct result of elimination of TERP.No impact.Virchow, Krause & Co. LLP Page 135March 11, 2002
Decision Item #30:Background:BUSSING 2.0 MILE RADIUSAccording to Wisconsin law ((statute 121.54 (2) (a)), a pupil attending apublic elementary or secondary school, including kindergarten, isentitled to transportation by the public school district in which the pupilresides if the pupil resides two or more miles from the nearest publicschool the pupil is entitled to attend.In addition to the 2.0-mile requirement, the District is required totransport pupils in areas of where unusual hazards exist for pupilswalking to and from school. The hazard plan is developed by the Boardof Education and filed with the county sheriff.MMSD enforces a hazard plan for all elementary schools, with thepresumption that hazards jeopardize the safety of elementary agepupils. The same presumption is not made with middle and high schools.It is presumed that middle and high school age pupil safety is notjeopardized by the same hazards due to their age.The Madison Metropolitan School District currently exceeds the 2.0-milestate law, electing to transport pupils residing 1.5 miles or more from thenearest public schools the pupil is entitled to attend.Our review of pupil transportation indicates potential savings for theDistrict to move to a policy of a 2.0-mile radius, as required by law, fromthe current 1.5-mile radius that exceeds the requirements of the statelaw.Expenditures:Revenues:FTE:For year 2001-2002 the additional total costs to the District for bussingon a 1.5 mile radius versus a 2.0 mile radius is $255,816.No revenues are generated.No FTE impact.Anticipated Savings: Bussing on a 2.0 mile radius versus a 1.5 mile eliminates a total of 12bus routes totaling an annual District savings of $255,816.Three elementary schools are served by 4 of the routes projected to beeliminated for a total savings of $19,282:Elementary School Routes EliminatedGompers 1Van Hise 1Huegel 2Two middle schools are served by 8 of the routes projected to beeliminated for a total savings of $236,534Middle School Routes EliminatedSpring Harbor 5Wright 3Virchow, Krause & Co. LLP Page 136March 11, 2002
Page 1 and 2:
MADISON METROPOLITANSCHOOL DISTRICT
Page 3 and 4:
Executive SummaryThe Madison Metrop
Page 5 and 6:
Project OverviewIn October 2001, th
Page 7 and 8:
APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (cont.)Ins
Page 10 and 11:
Budget DiscussionOVERALL DISTRICT E
Page 12 and 13:
MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES (cont.)Hence,
Page 14 and 15:
MANDATE INFORMATION (based on funct
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Budget Decision ItemsEXPLANATION OF
Page 48 and 49:
FISCAL IMPACT OF BUDGET DECISION IT
Page 50 and 51:
Decision Item #1:Effectiveness:REDU
Page 52 and 53:
Decision Item #2: ELIMINATE OR SECU
Page 54 and 55:
Decision Item #3: ELIMINATE THE VAC
Page 56 and 57:
Decision Item #4: REDUCE NON-MANDAT
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Decision Item #5:Revenues:ELIMINATE
Page 67 and 68:
Decision Item #6:Background:REDUCE
Page 69 and 70:
Decision Item #6: REDUCE SCHOOL LIB
Page 71 and 72:
Decision Item #6:Service Delivery:R
Page 73 and 74:
Decision Item #7:Option B:ELIMINATE
Page 75 and 76:
Decision Item #8:Background:REDUCE
Page 77 and 78:
Decision Item #8:Effectiveness:REDU
Page 79 and 80:
Decision Item #9: REDUCE FUNDING OF
Page 81 and 82:
Decision Item #10: REDUCE DISTRICT
Page 83 and 84:
Decision Item #11:REDUCE/REORGANIZE
Page 85 and 86:
Decision Item #11:Student Impact:RE
Page 87 and 88: Decision Item #12:Expenditures:REDU
Page 89 and 90: Decision Item #13:Background:INCLUD
Page 91 and 92: Decision Item #14: ELIMINATE DRIVER
Page 97 and 98: Decision Item #15:ELIMINATE THE ATH
Page 99 and 100: Decision Item #16:Strategic Priorit
Page 101 and 102: Decision Item #18:Background:REDIST
Page 103 and 104: Decision Item #19:REDUCE FUNDING FO
Page 105 and 106: Decision Item #20:Background:INCREA
Page 107 and 108: Decision Item #21:Background:REDUCE
Page 109 and 110: Decision Item #21:REDUCE/REORGANIZE
Page 111 and 112: Decision Item #22:Background: (cont
Page 113 and 114: Decision Item #22:ELIMINATE SELECTE
Page 115 and 116: Decision Item #23: ELIMINATE SELECT
Page 117 and 118: Decision Item #23: ELIMINATE SELECT
Page 119 and 120: Decision Item #24:Background: (cont
Page 121 and 122: Decision Item #24:Student Impact:EL
Page 123 and 124: Decision Item #25: REDUCE FUNCTIONS
Page 125 and 126: Decision Item #25: REDUCE FUNCTIONS
Page 127 and 128: Decision Item #26:Background:REDUCE
Page 129 and 130: Decision Item #27:Background:PRORAT
Page 131 and 132: Decision Item #27:Effectiveness:PRO
Page 133 and 134: Decision Item #28:Expenditures:ELIM
Page 135 and 136: Decision Item #29:Background:ELIMIN
Page 137: Decision Item #29: ELIMINATE TEACHE
Page 141 and 142: Decision Item #31:Background:ELIMIN
Page 143 and 144: Decision Item #31: ELIMINATE HIGH C
Page 145 and 146: Decision Item #32: RISK MANAGERBack
Page 147 and 148: Allocation AnalysisINSTRUCTION - RE
Page 149 and 150: INSTRUCTION - REGULAR EDUCATION (co
Page 155 and 156: INSTRUCTION - SPECIAL EDUCATIONBack
Page 157 and 158: INSTRUCTION - SPECIAL EDUCATION (co
Page 159 and 160: AdministrationAdministration is def
Page 161 and 162: Grant AnalysisFISCAL IMPACT OF GRAN
Page 163 and 164: GRANT ADMINISTRATIONThe District ma
Page 165 and 166: • Staff Development Course Offeri
Page 167 and 168: NEXT STEPS - INCORPORATING THE MODE
Page 169 and 170: A - MASTER LISTING
show all

The Final Report - Malcolm Shabazz City High School, Madison WI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?