The Final Report - Malcolm Shabazz City High School, Madison WI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Decision Item #16:ELIMINATE THE JUNIOR VARSITY TEAMS FORMED AS A RESULT OF“NO CUT” FRESHMEN OVERRUNOption A: Eliminate additional JV teamsOption B: Increase athletic fees charged to freshmen andsophomoresBackground:The District implemented a “no cut” freshmen policy more than 20 yearsago to provide freshmen an opportunity to gain experience in athleticsbefore roster limitations were enforced. As a result, an artificial need foradditional junior varsity teams was satisfied by creating additional JVteams, though students have had an opportunity to explore athletics at themiddle school and freshmen levels.While eliminating the “no cut” freshmen rule and subsequently eliminatingexcess freshmen and JV teams was considered in the past, fees chargedto seniors and juniors was raised $20 to help fund the program rather thaneliminate it.Expenditures:The District currently spends approximately $13,200 to add additional JVteams.Salaries & Fringe $ 7,500Officiating $ 1,700Transportation $ 4,000Total Expenditures $13,200Revenues:The revenue generated by participating athletes whose roster spots wouldbe eliminated with the abolishment of the additional JV teams isapproximately $2,400. The District charges $60 per sophomore, per sportto participate. Should additional JV teams be eliminated, approximately 40athletes would not participate in athletics, decreasing fees byapproximately $2,400. This figure assumes that athletes cut when tryingout for an initial sport would not join another team.FTE: 0.Anticipated Savings:Option A:eliminated.$10,800 could be saved if the additional JV teams wereOption B: Raising athletic fees for sophomores to $70 per student andjunior fees to $85 per student would raise athletic revenue byapproximately $14,000, covering the costs of additional JV teams.Student Impact:Option A: 40 Athletes would be impacted annually, a $260 net cost perstudent.Option B: Availability of athletics would not be reduced, however, theaccessibility to students may be hampered as some students may nothave the capacity to afford the increased fees. Also, facilities will continueto be overtaxed.Virchow, Krause & Co. LLP Page 95March 11, 2002
Decision Item #16:Strategic Priorities:Effectiveness:Redundancies orAvailability of theService Elsewhere:Service Delivery:ELIMINATE THE JUNIOR VARSITY TEAMS FORMED AS A RESULT OF“NO CUT” FRESHMEN OVERRUN (cont.)While we have not analyzed the direct impact athletic participation has onattendance, District sources cited research supporting participation inextracurricular activities, specifically athletics, increases impactedstudents’ school attendance.While the additional JV teams were created as a spill over of the “no cut”freshmen rule, upon arrival at the JV level athletes have had theopportunity to participate in athletics at the middle school level andperhaps at the freshmen level. The additional JV teams have increasedthe cost of providing athletics by increasing coaching, transportation andofficiating costs at the JV level and overtaxed practice facilities.Students not participating in the athletic activity of their choice have toopportunity to pursue other athletic activities or participate in other, nonathleticextracurricular activities.As an alternative to eliminating the additional JV teams, the District couldsignificantly raise athletic fees for all participants.Virchow, Krause & Co. LLP Page 96March 11, 2002
Page 1 and 2:
MADISON METROPOLITANSCHOOL DISTRICT
Page 3 and 4:
Executive SummaryThe Madison Metrop
Page 5 and 6:
Project OverviewIn October 2001, th
Page 7 and 8:
APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (cont.)Ins
Page 10 and 11:
Budget DiscussionOVERALL DISTRICT E
Page 12 and 13:
MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES (cont.)Hence,
Page 14 and 15:
MANDATE INFORMATION (based on funct
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Budget Decision ItemsEXPLANATION OF
Page 48 and 49: FISCAL IMPACT OF BUDGET DECISION IT
Page 50 and 51: Decision Item #1:Effectiveness:REDU
Page 52 and 53: Decision Item #2: ELIMINATE OR SECU
Page 54 and 55: Decision Item #3: ELIMINATE THE VAC
Page 56 and 57: Decision Item #4: REDUCE NON-MANDAT
Page 65 and 66: Decision Item #5:Revenues:ELIMINATE
Page 67 and 68: Decision Item #6:Background:REDUCE
Page 69 and 70: Decision Item #6: REDUCE SCHOOL LIB
Page 71 and 72: Decision Item #6:Service Delivery:R
Page 73 and 74: Decision Item #7:Option B:ELIMINATE
Page 77 and 78: Decision Item #8:Effectiveness:REDU
Page 79 and 80: Decision Item #9: REDUCE FUNDING OF
Page 81 and 82: Decision Item #10: REDUCE DISTRICT
Page 83 and 84: Decision Item #11:REDUCE/REORGANIZE
Page 85 and 86: Decision Item #11:Student Impact:RE
Page 87 and 88: Decision Item #12:Expenditures:REDU
Page 89 and 90: Decision Item #13:Background:INCLUD
Page 91 and 92: Decision Item #14: ELIMINATE DRIVER
Page 97: Decision Item #15:ELIMINATE THE ATH
Page 101 and 102: Decision Item #18:Background:REDIST
Page 103 and 104: Decision Item #19:REDUCE FUNDING FO
Page 105 and 106: Decision Item #20:Background:INCREA
Page 109 and 110: Decision Item #21:REDUCE/REORGANIZE
Page 111 and 112: Decision Item #22:Background: (cont
Page 113 and 114: Decision Item #22:ELIMINATE SELECTE
Page 115 and 116: Decision Item #23: ELIMINATE SELECT
Page 117 and 118: Decision Item #23: ELIMINATE SELECT
Page 119 and 120: Decision Item #24:Background: (cont
Page 121 and 122: Decision Item #24:Student Impact:EL
Page 123 and 124: Decision Item #25: REDUCE FUNCTIONS
Page 125 and 126: Decision Item #25: REDUCE FUNCTIONS
Page 129 and 130: Decision Item #27:Background:PRORAT
Page 131 and 132: Decision Item #27:Effectiveness:PRO
Page 133 and 134: Decision Item #28:Expenditures:ELIM
Page 135 and 136: Decision Item #29:Background:ELIMIN
Page 137 and 138: Decision Item #29: ELIMINATE TEACHE
Page 139 and 140: Decision Item #30:Background:BUSSIN
Page 141 and 142: Decision Item #31:Background:ELIMIN
Page 143 and 144: Decision Item #31: ELIMINATE HIGH C
Page 145 and 146: Decision Item #32: RISK MANAGERBack
Page 147 and 148: Allocation AnalysisINSTRUCTION - RE
Page 149 and 150:
INSTRUCTION - REGULAR EDUCATION (co
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
INSTRUCTION - SPECIAL EDUCATIONBack
Page 157 and 158:
INSTRUCTION - SPECIAL EDUCATION (co
Page 159 and 160:
AdministrationAdministration is def
Page 161 and 162:
Grant AnalysisFISCAL IMPACT OF GRAN
Page 163 and 164:
GRANT ADMINISTRATIONThe District ma
Page 165 and 166:
• Staff Development Course Offeri
Page 167 and 168:
NEXT STEPS - INCORPORATING THE MODE
Page 169 and 170:
A - MASTER LISTING
show all

The Final Report - Malcolm Shabazz City High School, Madison WI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?