IND 199 ECDE Baseline - CARE International's Electronic ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

xivTable 3.6: Distribution of households by no. of family members(Percentage)No. of family members Intervention districts Control districtIntervention Intermediate Control AWCsAWCs AWCs(n=) 828 844 9243-4 19.9 21.3 21.95-6 44 38.3 40.7Above 6 36.1 40.4 37.4Total number of members 5387 5652 5841Average household size (total no. ofmembers/total no. of households) 6.51 6.7 6.3233 3.2.2 Household compositionMore than three – fifths of households (64% in intervention and 63% in intermediate AWCs)and 57% in control AWCs belonged to nuclear family and the remaining ones had a joint familysystem (Table 3.7).Table 3.7: Distribution of households by type of family(Percentage)Type of family Intervention districts Control districtIntervention Intermediate Control AWCsAWCsAWCs(n=) 828 844 924Nuclear 63.9 63.2 57Joint 36.1 36.8 4334 3.2.3 Housing characteristicsMost of the households (63% in intervention, 71 in intermediate AWCs and 67% in controlAWCs) had a kaccha house to live in, while about one – fifth (26% in intervention 19% inintermediate and 20% in control AWCs) had a semi – pucca house and about one – tenth(10% in intervention and 13% in control district) were living in a pucca house (Table 3.8).Table 3.8: Distribution of households by type of house(Percentage)Type of house Intervention districts Control districtInterventionAWCsIntermediateAWCsControlAWCs(n=) 828 844 924Kaccha 63.5 71.4 67.4Semi pucca 25.6 18.6 19.6Pucca 10.9 10 13The types of water and sanitary facilities are important determinants of the health status ofhousehold members, particularly of children. The seriousness of major childhood diseases suchas diarrhoea can be reduced by proper hygienic practices. Therefore, the survey questionnaireof the mother / caregiver contained questions on sanitary facilities and sources of drinkingwater. Regarding the source of drinking water , 19 percent of households in interventiondistricts and 50 percent in control district had piped water, 67 percent in intervention and 42percent in control district had drinking water from a handpump and one – tenth of thehouseholds in intervention districts got water from wells (Tables 3.9).<strong>Baseline</strong> Study Of Early Childhood Care And Development Project In ChattisgarhApril,2012
xvTable 3.9: Distribution of households by main source of drinking water(Percentage)Main source of drinking water Intervention districts Control districtInterventionAWCsIntermediateAWCsControlAWCs(n=) 828 844 924Tap /piped water 19.8 17.5 49.6Hand pump 66.8 66.9 41.8Tube well 4.8 3.9 7.8Rivulet 0.6 0 0.3Well 8 11.6 0.5Regarding sanitation facilities, only around one -fifth of households in intervention districts and23 percent in control district had a toilet in their house. Those who did not have any toiletfacility, were further asked where their household members go for defecation. Almost all ofthem reported “open defection” (Table 3.10).Table 3.10: Distribution of households by toilet facility(Percentage)Particulars Intervention districts Control districtInterventionAWCsIntermediateAWCsControlAWCsToilet facilities in the house (n=) 828 844 924Yes 20.2 17.5 22.7No 79.8 82.5 77.3Place where family members go fordefecation (n=) 661 696 714Open space 99.1 99.9 99.7Shared toilets 0.9 0.1 0.335 3.2.4 Migration status for livelihoodAll the surveyed mothers / caregivers were asked whether any member of their household wasresiding at some other place for livelihood & if yes “number of years since when residing therewas gathered. Table 3.11 provides such information.Table 3.11: Distribution of households by migration details of household membersfor livelihood(Percentage)Particulars Intervention districts Control districtInterventionAWCsIntermediateAWCsControlAWCsAny family member residing in otherstate/town for livelihood (n=) 828 844 924Yes 4 2.8 6.8No 96 97.2 93.2No. of years since residing in otherstate / town (n=) 33 24 631 21.2 25 20.62 12.1 16.7 9.53 12.1 4.2 11.14 9.1 16.7 6.35 9.1 4.2 12.76 6.1 4.2 9.57 or more 30.3 29.0 30.3Average 6.7 6.21 6.11<strong>Baseline</strong> Study Of Early Childhood Care And Development Project In ChattisgarhApril,2012
Page 1 and 2: 1Evaluation e-Library (EeL) cover p
Page 3 and 4: 3April, 2012Baseline Study Of Early
Page 5 and 6: 55.4 Status of development of child
Page 7 and 8: 23 CHAPTER - I4 INTRODUCTIONThis ch
Page 9 and 10: iii5. Caregivers Understanding and
Page 11 and 12: vThe sampled AWCs were also observe
Page 13 and 14: vii2.5.2 Training of the field team
Page 15 and 16: ix• Training, including mock inte
Page 17 and 18: xi24 CHAPTER -III25 PROFILE OF THE
Page 19: xiiiTable 3.4: Distribution of resp
Page 23 and 24: xviiTable 3.12: Distribution of hou
Page 25 and 26: xixone - fifth were helped by their
Page 27 and 28: xxi4.1.4 Receipt of TT injectionsAl
Page 29 and 30: xxiiiTable 4.6: Rest and extra meal
Page 31 and 32: xxv• “Pre - school education to
Page 33 and 34: xxviiFrom Table 4.11, the following
Page 35 and 36: xxix• Almost 79 percent of them i
Page 37 and 38: xxxi4.4.3 Receipt of vitamin A dose
Page 39 and 40: xxxiiidistricts of Janjgir & korba
Page 41 and 42: xxxvTable 4.23: Distribution of chi
Page 43 and 44: xxxvii4.5.1.2 Knowledge of frequenc
Page 45 and 46: xxxixTable 4.29: Distribution of mo
Page 47 and 48: xli4.6.2 Practices in handling food
Page 49 and 50: xliii• Majority of them (56% in i
Page 51 and 52: xlv• Mostly father provides help
Page 53 and 54: xlvii64 5.3 School going practices
Page 55 and 56: xlixTable 5.7: Perception of mother
Page 57 and 58: liTable 5.10: Key milestones achiev
Page 59 and 60: liiiTable 5.14: Knowledge about ele
Page 61 and 62: lvInterventionAWCsIntermediateAWCsC
Page 63 and 64: lvii73 6.4 Chattisgarh mahila kosh
Page 65 and 66: lix• Regarding knowledge of regis
Page 67 and 68: lxi• Only 3 percent of the respon
Page 69 and 70: lxiiibead with nylon wire” in int
Page 71 and 72:
lxvActivity no. Question asked Poss
Page 73 and 74:
lxviiOverall scoring on pre - mathe
Page 75 and 76:
lxixOverall scoring of language ski
Page 77 and 78:
lxxi84 7.3 Nutritional status of ch
Page 79 and 80:
lxxiiiNutritionalTotal Janjgir and
Page 81 and 82:
lxxvWith regard to segments of pre
Page 83 and 84:
lxxviiTable 8.3: Availability & con
Page 85 and 86:
lxxixOn asking what they knew about
Page 87 and 88:
lxxxiTable 8.9: Use of growth monit
Page 89 and 90:
lxxxiiiTable 8.13: knowledge of AWW
Page 91 and 92:
lxxxvTable 8.16: Distribution of AW
Page 93 and 94:
lxxxviiTable 8.18: AWW’s understa
Page 95 and 96:
lxxxixActivities which were reporte
Page 97 and 98:
xciTable 9.1: Distribution of AWCs
Page 99 and 100:
xciiiTable 9.1: Distribution of AWC
Page 101 and 102:
Baseline Study Of Early Childhood C
Page 103 and 104:
xcviiMean score 0.807 0.799 1.612Ba
Page 105 and 106:
xcixTable 9.4: Distribution of AWCs
Page 107 and 108:
ciTable 9.4: Distribution of AWCs b
Page 109 and 110:
ciiiTable 9.4: Distribution of AWCs
Page 111 and 112:
cvhelp each other.Unplanned opportu
Page 113 and 114:
cviidefined in the checklist). Thes
Page 115 and 116:
cixabout it. .Baseline Study Of Ear
Page 117 and 118:
cxi97 CHAPTER -X98 AWARENESS AND IN
Page 119 and 120:
cxiii10.1.5 Activities in AWCs for
Page 121 and 122:
cxv10.1.8 Milestones children ages
Page 123 and 124:
cxviiAs pointed out earlier, data f
Page 125:
cxix5. Only 65% CDPOs reported that
show all

IND 199 ECDE Baseline - CARE International's Electronic ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?