inner–london schools 1918–44 a thematic study - English Heritage

Endnotes1 See Brook 2004.2 Saint 1977, 38; Swarbrick 1947.3 Dudek 2000, 33; Whitbread 1972, 68; Saint 1987, 44.4 Darling 2007, 158.5 Blackstone 1971, 42-50.6 Darling 2007, 158.7 LCC 1947; LCC 1939, 33.8 LCC 1939, 81.9 Architects’ Journal 19.3.1980, p566.10 Blyth 1965.11 Harwood forthcoming a.12 Workers’ Educational Association pamphlet, cited in LCC 1947, 10.13 Board of Education 1931.14 Central Advisory Council for Education 1967.15 The raising of the school leaving age was recommended by the Hadow committee, and the Boardof Education subsequently announced in January 1936 that the leaving age would be raised to fifteenin September 1939.16 LCC memorandum from the Education Officer to the Architect, 15.7.1920.17 Finlay 1902; Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 123-24.18 Foreword by Education Officer G.H. Gater to the 1929 LCC Annual Report.19 Aldrich 2002, 37.20 LCC 1939, 81.21 Rowntree and Lavers 1951, 325.22 Saint 1987, 40.23 Dudek 2000, 36.24 Burke and Grosvenor 2008, 87.25 Rée 1985, 148.26 Rowntree and Lavers 1951, 325.27 Harwood forthcoming b.28 Bourne and Latham 1991, 78.29 Although the LCC had reused existing buildings in the Bostall Woods experiment of 1908, andothers, including the McMillan sisters, advocated an improvisatory, ‘home-made’ approach to schoolbuildings (Saint 2003, 74).30 Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 111.31 Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 113.32 Board of Education 1932, 5.© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 0919