27 Obituary in RIBA Journal, April 1944.28 Saint 1995.29 Goulden 1965, 598.30 LCC Education Committee minutes 3.4.1917 and 27.1.1920; Stevinson 1927, 55. The RachelMcMillan school was instead built on the site.31 LCC Education Committee minutes 14.10.1919.32 LCC minutes 30.10.1934, pp. 457-60 (elementary) and pp.463-65 (secondary).33 Sargent and Seymour 1932.34 Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 109.35 LCC 1920, 61.36 Memo of 29 May 1920 from the Education Officer to the Architect (L M A : A R /CB/1/65).37 Harwood forthcoming a.38 The LCC architect E.P. Wheeler wrote to the Hendon Corporation for information on their timberframed<strong>schools</strong> in December 1937 (L M A : A R /CB/1/ 70).39 Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 118.40 Report of visit 26.11.1934, in L M A : A R /CB/1/ 70.41 Saint 1987; Harwood forthcoming b.42 Letter of 10.5.1938 from D.E. Cooke to E.M. Rich (L M A : A R /C B /1/ 70).43 Extract from the London Evening Standard, 26.7.1938, in L M A : A R /C B /1/ 70.44 Minutes of the LCC Elementary Education subcommittee, 13.11.1938.45 Letter of 23.12.1937 from F. Jackman, assistant architect to the Board of Education to E.P Wheeler,Architect to the LCC (L M A : A R /CB/1/ 70).46 Harwood forthcoming b.47 LCC annual report 1937.48 Stevinson 1927, 24.49 LCC minutes 21.1.1930, p.42.50 Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 130. Mature trees were also retained at Cephas Street, L B TowerHamlets, 1928; and Dunraven, L B Lambeth, 1934.51 LCC 1939.52 Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 138.53 The Builder, 18.2.1938, pp351-52.54 Saint 1995, 34.55 Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 141.56 Charles Booth, quoted in Saint 1995, 36.57 Seaborne and Lowe 1977, 126.58 Architects’ Journal 19.3.1980, p566.59 Saint 1987, 39. There is evidence that the LCC A D employed a similar approach.© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 0949
60 Board of Education 1938.61 Saler 1999.62 Hill went on to design three further <strong>schools</strong>, only one of which was built. Two entirely differentdesigns were produced for Middle Park Junior school, Eltham, L B Greenwich in 1938-39, but warintervened. The Senior School at Methely near Rotherwell was one of two schemes for the WestRiding Educational Authority. Whitwood Mere Infant School (Grade II), like the first Eltham design,has a curved plan out of which a fan-shaped hall develops (Powers 1989, 46-48).63 Powers 1987 and <strong>English</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> report of December 1991 by Andrew Saint entitled HillyfieldsSixth Form Centre; copy in the Historians’ Files, <strong>English</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> London Region, file referenceL E W50.64 Powers 1989, 47 and http://www.lynnpearson.co.uk/Yorkshire.pdf.65 LCC 1939.66 Working list of Schools Division architects compiled from LCC A D files held at the L M A . Biographicaldata from B A L biographical files, Brodie et al 2001 and L M A :GLC /A R /DA /02.67 Beattie 1980, 17.68 LCC 1927, 31-32.69 The Architect, 15.4.1921, p268.70 Beattie 1980.71 The breaking-up of the eaves line by classroom windows ran contrary to the edicts of the Board ofEducation, who discouraged them as a false economy (1932, 5).72 The Builder, 26.11.1926, p.874.73 Cooper’s Lane of 1936, Fox, Cubitt and King’s Park of 1937 and Glengall of 1939. TheSuperintending Architect of King’s Park and Cubitt <strong>schools</strong> was H.F.T. Cooper (1874-1944). An LCCphotograph of Elfrida taken shortly after completion of construction shows an LCC informationboard on which Nisbett’s name can be made out (Photograph in an uncatalogued album held in theL M A entitled ‘LCC <strong>schools</strong> section photographs’).© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 0950
- Page 2 and 3:
Research Department Report Series 4
- Page 11 and 12: The final part of the report proper
- Page 13 and 14: would best be considered within the
- Page 15 and 16: © ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 09
- Page 17 and 18: IntroductionThe provision of school
- Page 19 and 20: The augmentation of state nursery p
- Page 21 and 22: central schools, either newly built
- Page 23 and 24: Fig 8: Model of Impington, possibly
- Page 25 and 26: single-storey brick buildings, redu
- Page 27 and 28: 33 Board of Education 1931a, 58.34
- Page 29 and 30: IntroductionFrom 1870 until 1990, t
- Page 31 and 32: Fig. 12: SBL datestone from the Wes
- Page 33 and 34: Fig. 14: The classroom pavilions at
- Page 35 and 36: Fig. 18: Granton Road School, L B L
- Page 37 and 38: considered no less important. Londo
- Page 39 and 40: Fig. 22: Infants' Department of Ath
- Page 41 and 42: module. 41 Stillman’s schools wer
- Page 43 and 44: a spacious playground with retained
- Page 45 and 46: collegiate air of a preparatory sch
- Page 47 and 48: Fig 32: Junior school classrooms at
- Page 49 and 50: emain a “book-learnt” conceptio
- Page 51 and 52: Fig 36: Herbert Francis Thomas Coop
- Page 53 and 54: contemporaries, with their widely s
- Page 55: Endnotes1 On the abolition of the L
- Page 59 and 60: The nursery schoolCase studies:•
- Page 61 and 62: designs, the second of 1937 with Ma
- Page 63 and 64: Fig. 52: Webb Street School elevati
- Page 65 and 66: Fig. 55: North Hammersmith Central
- Page 67 and 68: The secondary schoolCase studies:
- Page 69 and 70: Fig 59: Maze Hill elevation to the
- Page 71 and 72: admired ‘more than any other arch
- Page 73 and 74: grants in the form of building subs
- Page 75 and 76: accommodated 440 junior children in
- Page 77 and 78: The open-air schoolCase studies:•
- Page 79 and 80: three open-air schools opened by th
- Page 81 and 82: Fig 71: The buildings of the Geere
- Page 83 and 84: As Frederick Rose predicted in 1908
- Page 85 and 86: L B Wandsworth, by providing ‘roo
- Page 87 and 88: LAN ANCE SURVEY PLANwithout mainten
- Page 89 and 90: Endnotes1 LCC minutes 17.7.1928, p.
- Page 91 and 92: 44 Catholic Hall, Appleton Road, El
- Page 93 and 94: © ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 098
- Page 95 and 96: Board of Education 1923 The differe
- Page 97 and 98: English Heritage 1993 General princ
- Page 99 and 100: Morrison, K. 1999 The workhouse: a
- Page 101 and 102: Whitbread N. 1972 The evolution of
- Page 103 and 104: Appendix 1: Gazetteer of extant pur
- Page 105 and 106: Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 107 and 108:
Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 109 and 110:
Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 111 and 112:
The S towag e pl anPeckham Park, 18
- Page 113 and 114:
The en d hall pl anUpper North Stre
- Page 115 and 116:
The b u t ter fly pl anAthelney Str
- Page 117 and 118:
• Separate-block planning refers
- Page 119 and 120:
Appendix 5: Glossary of school type
- Page 121 and 122:
increasing popular after the 1926 a