The denominational schoolCase <strong>study</strong>:Bygrove Primary School (formerly Holy Child Catholic Primary School), Bygrove Road, Poplar, L BTower Hamlets. Thomas Henry Birchall Scott (1872-1945), 1926.The Dual System in the Inter-war YearsIn the inter-war period, denominational, i.e. Jewish and church <strong>schools</strong>, comprised nearlya third of the <strong>schools</strong> in England and Wales. 17 They differed from the maintained <strong>schools</strong>mainly in providing denominational religious instruction and the way in which the schoolwas managed. But it was their funding problems that shaped the appearance of theschool buildings. The 1902 Education Act had reaffirmed the so-called ‘dual system’, thatis the co-existence of state and denominational <strong>schools</strong>, and further formalised it. Underits terms, the religious body had the right to give denominational instruction and controlthe appointment of teachers. In return, it provided the building, kept it in good repair andmade any necessary alterations and improvements; while the local authority would repairany damage caused by ‘fair wear and tear’. 18While this extended much-needed financial support to existing denominational <strong>schools</strong>,these provisions remained virtually unchanged during the inter-war period, and soonbecame insufficient. Many denominational authorities struggled financially, particularly toprovide new premises or to update old ones. 19 The Hadow reorganisation, the raisingof the school-leaving age, and the need to provide for expanding populations and newsuburbs, all added further pressures. Building costs soared, while donations for church<strong>schools</strong> dwindled, due to a relative decline in church attendance and religious adherence,as well as economic depression and unemployment. 20The perceived financial injustice of having to raise funds from donations, whilestate <strong>schools</strong> were built with ratepayers’ money, occupied the church school sectorthroughout the inter-war years. The mood, particularly with the Catholic bishops, wasdefensive, fighting to save denominational <strong>schools</strong> and their particular ethos in the faceof proposals to abolish them. In 1918, the dual system in Scotland came to an end,when all denominational <strong>schools</strong> were handed to the state, while continuing existingreligious instruction by teachers approved by the individual denomination. 21 During thefollowing years, H.A.L. Fisher, President of the Board of Education, proposed a numberof solutions to the dual system in England, some of them along the lines of the ‘Scottishsolution’, i.e. transferring all non-provided <strong>schools</strong> to the local authorities, which had toprovide opportunities for denominational instruction at the parents’ request. 22 However,while some church bodies where in favour, no agreement could be reached. Rather,compromises where achieved at local level where many authorities followed the solutionfound in 1924 in Cambridgeshire where, in consultation with the church bodies, a nondenominationalreligious syllabus was drawn up which could be applied to provided andtransferred <strong>schools</strong>. 23As an emergency measure attempting to address the unbalanced financial situation ofdenominational <strong>schools</strong>, the Education Act of 1936 offered (for the first time) Exchequer© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 0965
grants in the form of building subsidies. These were to provide 50-75% of the cost oferecting new senior non-provided <strong>schools</strong> made necessary by the reorganisation ofthe elementary system and the raising of the leaving age. The grants, limited to theyears 1936-39, still depended on the support of the local authorities and requiredthe denominations to give up their right to appoint teachers. 24 Within the three yearsspecified, 519 proposals were submitted, 289 by the Catholic authorities and 230 by theAnglicans. 25 Due to the outbreak of war, most of these never materialised and many,particularly Catholic, elementary <strong>schools</strong> were only reorganised after 1945. 26The Education Act of 1944, in trying to resolve the problems of the denominational<strong>schools</strong> rather than abolishing them, established two new types of denominational<strong>schools</strong>. These combined varying degrees of independence with state support: The firstwas fully denominational or ‘aided’ <strong>schools</strong>, where the church body controlled teacherappointments and paid for equipment and running costs; these were eligible for grantscovering 50% (later 75%) of building costs. The second category comprised partiallydenominational or ‘controlled’ <strong>schools</strong> which had been surrendered to the local authoritybut maintained denominational religious instruction. 27Inter-war Denominational Schools in LondonWhile Anglican and Catholic <strong>schools</strong> formed the majority of denominational <strong>schools</strong> inEngland and Wales, inter-war building projects in London were predominantly Catholic<strong>schools</strong>, rather than Church of England, Nonconformist and Jewish <strong>schools</strong>.Due to the ‘shifting pattern of London Jewish migration’, long-established Jewish <strong>schools</strong>were underpopulated by 1939, and, it would appear, only one purpose-built school,Bayswater Jewish School (1928-30, L B Kensington and Chelsea) was erected in Londonduring the inter-war years, after the school moved to a new site. 28 Likewise, a singleNonconformist school was built (Mount Zion Baptist School, L B Islington; 1929-30). 29The Church of England built few <strong>schools</strong> and, on a national level, between 1902 and 1938closed or surrendered to the state each year about 100 <strong>schools</strong> (both elementary andsecondary). 30 In inner London, they increasingly retreated from the elementary sector:according to Board of Education lists of elementary <strong>schools</strong> (the so-called List 21), nonew Church of England elementary <strong>schools</strong> were opened in London between 1918 and1944, while two were rebuilt, twelve closed and one transferred to the local authority.For the Catholic <strong>schools</strong>, this relationship was almost the inverse: with ten newly-opened<strong>schools</strong> (albeit not all purpose- or newly-built), three rebuilt and only two closed. 31 Theelementary sector seems to have been the main focus for Catholic education provision,as no new secondary <strong>schools</strong> were built and only a few extended or altered during the<strong>study</strong> period.Instead of providing new <strong>schools</strong>, the Church of England authorities focused on extendingand updating existing <strong>schools</strong>, as well as moving existing <strong>schools</strong> away from overcrowdedand unsuitable city centre premises. The latter was achieved in the case of threeendowed Church of England foundations in partnership with the LCC, by a variety ofmeans. In addition to building grants, these included the provision of an LCC-built school© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 0966
- Page 2 and 3:
Research Department Report Series 4
- Page 11 and 12:
The final part of the report proper
- Page 13 and 14:
would best be considered within the
- Page 15 and 16:
© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 09
- Page 17 and 18:
IntroductionThe provision of school
- Page 19 and 20:
The augmentation of state nursery p
- Page 21 and 22: central schools, either newly built
- Page 23 and 24: Fig 8: Model of Impington, possibly
- Page 25 and 26: single-storey brick buildings, redu
- Page 27 and 28: 33 Board of Education 1931a, 58.34
- Page 29 and 30: IntroductionFrom 1870 until 1990, t
- Page 31 and 32: Fig. 12: SBL datestone from the Wes
- Page 33 and 34: Fig. 14: The classroom pavilions at
- Page 35 and 36: Fig. 18: Granton Road School, L B L
- Page 37 and 38: considered no less important. Londo
- Page 39 and 40: Fig. 22: Infants' Department of Ath
- Page 41 and 42: module. 41 Stillman’s schools wer
- Page 43 and 44: a spacious playground with retained
- Page 45 and 46: collegiate air of a preparatory sch
- Page 47 and 48: Fig 32: Junior school classrooms at
- Page 49 and 50: emain a “book-learnt” conceptio
- Page 51 and 52: Fig 36: Herbert Francis Thomas Coop
- Page 53 and 54: contemporaries, with their widely s
- Page 55 and 56: Endnotes1 On the abolition of the L
- Page 57 and 58: 60 Board of Education 1938.61 Saler
- Page 59 and 60: The nursery schoolCase studies:•
- Page 61 and 62: designs, the second of 1937 with Ma
- Page 63 and 64: Fig. 52: Webb Street School elevati
- Page 65 and 66: Fig. 55: North Hammersmith Central
- Page 67 and 68: The secondary schoolCase studies:
- Page 69 and 70: Fig 59: Maze Hill elevation to the
- Page 71: admired ‘more than any other arch
- Page 75 and 76: accommodated 440 junior children in
- Page 77 and 78: The open-air schoolCase studies:•
- Page 79 and 80: three open-air schools opened by th
- Page 81 and 82: Fig 71: The buildings of the Geere
- Page 83 and 84: As Frederick Rose predicted in 1908
- Page 85 and 86: L B Wandsworth, by providing ‘roo
- Page 87 and 88: LAN ANCE SURVEY PLANwithout mainten
- Page 89 and 90: Endnotes1 LCC minutes 17.7.1928, p.
- Page 91 and 92: 44 Catholic Hall, Appleton Road, El
- Page 93 and 94: © ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 098
- Page 95 and 96: Board of Education 1923 The differe
- Page 97 and 98: English Heritage 1993 General princ
- Page 99 and 100: Morrison, K. 1999 The workhouse: a
- Page 101 and 102: Whitbread N. 1972 The evolution of
- Page 103 and 104: Appendix 1: Gazetteer of extant pur
- Page 105 and 106: Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 107 and 108: Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 109 and 110: Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 111 and 112: The S towag e pl anPeckham Park, 18
- Page 113 and 114: The en d hall pl anUpper North Stre
- Page 115 and 116: The b u t ter fly pl anAthelney Str
- Page 117 and 118: • Separate-block planning refers
- Page 119 and 120: Appendix 5: Glossary of school type
- Page 121 and 122: increasing popular after the 1926 a