Fig. 16: A geography lesson in an open-air classroom atNorth Hammersmith Central School, , L B Hammersmith andFulham (LCC AD; 1931). (L M A : SC /PHL /02/0267-25; City ofLondon, London Metropolitan Archives).The open-air <strong>schools</strong> (see page70) acheived similar ends by meansof a different planning technique:separate-block planning. 13 Theterm as used here refers to thepolarisation of the functions of aschool into clusters of separate,freestanding blocks, connected by apath or covered way (see Appendix4). Margaret McMillan commented,‘the form of the open-air nursery<strong>schools</strong> is not one large building,but many small shelters: a collectionof small townships; of small classes,each one self-contained’. 14 Thisisolating plan was developed inhospitals and workhouses in the 19 thcentury as an alternative to a singlebuilding which improved ventilationand inhibited contagious disease. 15Introduced to the design of theLCC’s open-air <strong>schools</strong>, it had theadded advantage of noise insulationand integration with the maturelandscapes of their sites. Each formwas associated with a specificactivity—teaching, dining, resting—and the whole was informal, diffuseand less ‘institutional’: there were nogrand entrances in open-air <strong>schools</strong>,for example.Fig. 17: Wilmot Street School, L B Tower Hamlets (LCC AD;1931). (L M A: uncatalogued album entitled ‘LCC <strong>schools</strong>section photographs’; City of London, London MetropolitanArchives).From the early 1920s, aspects ofopen-air school design began toinfluence mainstream <strong>schools</strong> inLondon, largely though the provisionof outdoor terraces and openairclassrooms ‘capable of beingthrown almost entirely open’. 16Full-height, folding French windowsor partially-glazed screens alloweddirect access from classroom toplayground, and corridors were transformed into open verandas or access galleries, anarrangement pioneered by Hutchings and Widdows in Staffordshire and Derbyshirerespectively. This arrangement was at first met by teachers with enthusiasm but by theLCC with caution, as recorded in the minutes of a 1925 meeting with representativesof the London Headteachers’ Association: ‘the teachers were enthusiastically in favour© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 0927
Fig. 18: Granton Road School, L B Lambeth (LCC AD; 1928).(L M A:SC/PHL/02/0242-36; City of London, LondonMetropolitan Archives).of building new <strong>schools</strong> with anopen verandah. They agreedwith me that we were hardlyripe for a school with the openverandah on both sides with thesides of the rooms capable ofpractically being removed, as inthe case of North Wingfield andother <strong>schools</strong> in Derbyshire’. 17Nevertheless, the LCC AD sooncommenced designing <strong>schools</strong> ofthe ‘Derbyshire type’ (see page25), such as Ealdham Square, L BGreenwich, of 1928-29. 18 Thiswas a multi-storey elementaryschool with gallery-access openairclassrooms, an experimentrepeated by the LCC in the early 1930s. By 1928 the LCC had incorporated a total of167 open-air classrooms into their new elementary <strong>schools</strong>. 19 One such example wasFurzedown, L B Wandsworth, of 1928. The Council’s two experimental nursery <strong>schools</strong>(Columbia Market and Old Church Street, both in Tower Hamlets and designed in 1929)incorporated open-air classrooms. In 1930-31, the LCC built a girls’ secondary school withopen-air classrooms (see page 63). After the initial enthusiasm of the open-air craze,something of a backlash against open-air classrooms occurred (see page 57).Flexible classroom layouts facilitated a mixture of formal and informal education, anemphasis on project and collaborative work, and the principal of encouraging childrento make discoveries for themselves. By the end of the period light and portable schoolfurniture was available, and informal layouts were being advocated in nursery and infants<strong>schools</strong>. Communal facilities, such as halls and libraries, were given greater emphasisin planning and equipped for new uses such as music, drama, cinema and radio. Hallswere increasingly shared by departments for reasons of economy, but also because ofthe increasing prevalence of co-educational primary <strong>schools</strong>. The Board of Educationrecommended central halls, and discouraged double-banked classrooms and classroomsopening directly on to the hall, two aspects of board school planning. 20 The hall wasoccasionally built as a separate block from the classrooms, as at the Honor Oak Schoolfor Girls, L B Southwark of 1930-31.Attention was paid for the first time to specialist accommodation such as gymnasia,science labs, geography, arts and crafts studios, manual and domestic workshops,and music rooms. Most maintained secondary <strong>schools</strong> were provided with speciallyequippedrooms, not just those <strong>schools</strong> with a vocational or technical emphasis. Evenelementary <strong>schools</strong> with as few as four classrooms, such as Carnac Street central school,L B Lambeth and Dalmain Road elementary school, L B Lewisham (both LCC AD, 1928),were equipped with workshops. These were located centrally, displacing the centralhall of the LCC model plan (see page 102). Workshops and laboratories, with theircomplex space-planning and servicing requirements were sometimes accommodated© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 0928
- Page 2 and 3: Research Department Report Series 4
- Page 11 and 12: The final part of the report proper
- Page 13 and 14: would best be considered within the
- Page 15 and 16: © ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 09
- Page 17 and 18: IntroductionThe provision of school
- Page 19 and 20: The augmentation of state nursery p
- Page 21 and 22: central schools, either newly built
- Page 23 and 24: Fig 8: Model of Impington, possibly
- Page 25 and 26: single-storey brick buildings, redu
- Page 27 and 28: 33 Board of Education 1931a, 58.34
- Page 29 and 30: IntroductionFrom 1870 until 1990, t
- Page 31 and 32: Fig. 12: SBL datestone from the Wes
- Page 33: Fig. 14: The classroom pavilions at
- Page 37 and 38: considered no less important. Londo
- Page 39 and 40: Fig. 22: Infants' Department of Ath
- Page 41 and 42: module. 41 Stillman’s schools wer
- Page 43 and 44: a spacious playground with retained
- Page 45 and 46: collegiate air of a preparatory sch
- Page 47 and 48: Fig 32: Junior school classrooms at
- Page 49 and 50: emain a “book-learnt” conceptio
- Page 51 and 52: Fig 36: Herbert Francis Thomas Coop
- Page 53 and 54: contemporaries, with their widely s
- Page 55 and 56: Endnotes1 On the abolition of the L
- Page 57 and 58: 60 Board of Education 1938.61 Saler
- Page 59 and 60: The nursery schoolCase studies:•
- Page 61 and 62: designs, the second of 1937 with Ma
- Page 63 and 64: Fig. 52: Webb Street School elevati
- Page 65 and 66: Fig. 55: North Hammersmith Central
- Page 67 and 68: The secondary schoolCase studies:
- Page 69 and 70: Fig 59: Maze Hill elevation to the
- Page 71 and 72: admired ‘more than any other arch
- Page 73 and 74: grants in the form of building subs
- Page 75 and 76: accommodated 440 junior children in
- Page 77 and 78: The open-air schoolCase studies:•
- Page 79 and 80: three open-air schools opened by th
- Page 81 and 82: Fig 71: The buildings of the Geere
- Page 83 and 84: As Frederick Rose predicted in 1908
- Page 85 and 86:
L B Wandsworth, by providing ‘roo
- Page 87 and 88:
LAN ANCE SURVEY PLANwithout mainten
- Page 89 and 90:
Endnotes1 LCC minutes 17.7.1928, p.
- Page 91 and 92:
44 Catholic Hall, Appleton Road, El
- Page 93 and 94:
© ENGLISH H ER I TAG E 43 - 20 098
- Page 95 and 96:
Board of Education 1923 The differe
- Page 97 and 98:
English Heritage 1993 General princ
- Page 99 and 100:
Morrison, K. 1999 The workhouse: a
- Page 101 and 102:
Whitbread N. 1972 The evolution of
- Page 103 and 104:
Appendix 1: Gazetteer of extant pur
- Page 105 and 106:
Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 107 and 108:
Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 109 and 110:
Original name Present Name & Addres
- Page 111 and 112:
The S towag e pl anPeckham Park, 18
- Page 113 and 114:
The en d hall pl anUpper North Stre
- Page 115 and 116:
The b u t ter fly pl anAthelney Str
- Page 117 and 118:
• Separate-block planning refers
- Page 119 and 120:
Appendix 5: Glossary of school type
- Page 121 and 122:
increasing popular after the 1926 a