12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

comes with the territory <strong>of</strong> their anthropology. However, people may choose one <strong>of</strong> threecommon <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> transcendent evasion:a) a naïve preoccupation with the controllable world <strong>of</strong> the concrete andmaterial, where the questions <strong>of</strong> meaning are suppressed by their beingignored;b) a recognition that an ultimate question encompasses human experience butassuming that engagement with the question can be postponed, and thatattempts to find any kind <strong>of</strong> answer are fruitless;c) a focus on getting on with life’s tasks, knowing that, while an ultimatequestion encompasses everything, as there is no hope <strong>of</strong> ever finding ananswer, the question is deliberately suppressed and rejected as unanswerableand there<strong>for</strong>e meaningless 137 .Rahner suggests that a worldview that dismisses a serious engagement with the obviousreality <strong>of</strong> existential transcendence and the search <strong>for</strong> a meaningful spiritual answer to thequestions it raises is far from enlightened; the view <strong>of</strong> empirical science and humanreasoning as the ultimate evolution <strong>of</strong> human knowledge and development is in fact a<strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> denial and psychological repression. Rahner’s philosophical argument <strong>for</strong> atheology <strong>of</strong> mystery lays the plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> an apologetic against an exclusively secularapproach to life and against the view that Christian theology is nothing more than anoutdated relic <strong>of</strong> a pre-modern era.Rahner also reflects in Foundations on the pervasive existence <strong>of</strong> the word ‘God’ inhuman language, and what it would mean <strong>for</strong> humans as a species if <strong>this</strong> word (or a termwith equivalent meaning) were to disappear from their vocabulary.‘God’ is not just any word in which language, that is, the self-expression <strong>of</strong> theself-present <strong>of</strong> world and human existence together, grasps itself in its ground.This word exists, it belongs in a special and unique way to our world <strong>of</strong> languageand thus to our world. It is in itself a reality, and indeed one that we cannot avoid.This reality might be present speaking clearly or obscurely, s<strong>of</strong>tly or loudly. But itis at least there as a question… [Because the] word ‘God’ occurs as a question tous, [it] is an image and likeness <strong>of</strong> what it announces. We should not think that,137 Rahner , Foundations, 33.119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!