12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘listening to the freely pr<strong>of</strong>fered self-revelation <strong>of</strong> God’ 12 . According to Rahner, iftheology’s source is the experiences <strong>of</strong> those who have learned how to listen to God’sself-revelation throughout human history, then the study <strong>of</strong> God must also involve a study<strong>of</strong> the human person:As soon as…[the human person] is understood as the being who is absolutelytranscendent in respect <strong>of</strong> God, ‘anthropocentricity’ and ‘theocentricity’ intheology are not opposites but strictly one and the same thing, seen from twosides. Neither <strong>of</strong> the two aspects can be comprehended at all without the otherThough Rahner’s argument <strong>for</strong> understanding the human person as a being <strong>of</strong> ‘absolutetranscendence’ derives from his theological conviction and spiritual experience, it isexpressed apologetically and pastorally in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> philosophical reflection14 ; afoundational element <strong>of</strong> Rahner’s theology <strong>of</strong> mystery 15 is his philosophical argumentthat human transcendence is an integral and ‘natural’ 16 component <strong>of</strong> being human.13.According to Rahner, a human being is something <strong>of</strong> a contradiction in terms: thoughhumans live a finite existence, reflection on their existence points humans towards anawareness <strong>of</strong> the infinite nature <strong>of</strong> their origin and destiny. He asserts that humans canonly recognise objects and experiences as finite because they have an idea <strong>of</strong> infinity 17 .He uses the simile <strong>of</strong> white chalk marks on a blackboard to demonstrate that the concept<strong>of</strong> something being finite is recognisable only against the background <strong>of</strong> an idea <strong>of</strong> theinfinite 18 . Rahner concludes that infinity is the condition in which the existence <strong>of</strong> thefinite is possible: the idea <strong>of</strong> infinity, against which humans measure things that are finite,inevitably points towards an origin and destiny that that the idea reflects.12 Ibid.13 K Rahner, ‘Theology and anthropology’, in Theological investigations, Vol. IX, Trans. G. Harrison(London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1972), 28.14 Dych, Karl Rahner, 32.15 Though as we shall see in later discussion, exactly what is meant by ‘foundational’ as <strong>this</strong> term is appliedto a reading <strong>of</strong> Rahner on the basis <strong>of</strong> his speculative approach is debatable.16 Though as Egan points out, according to Rahner there is no such thing as a fully ‘natural’ person as everyperson is graced with the <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> God’s self-communication. See The Cambridge companion to KarlRahner, 17.17 J. O’Donnell, ‘The mystery <strong>of</strong> faith in the theology <strong>of</strong> Karl Rahner’, Heythrop Journal 25 (1984):303.18 Egan, The Cambridge companion to Karl Rahner, 17-18.82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!