12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

inability or unwillingness <strong>of</strong> the established religions to recognise the validity <strong>of</strong> the newexpressions <strong>of</strong> spiritual impulse on the other, put the culture at risk.Tacey is particularly concerned that, without proper guidance and support, the spiritualimpulse will express itself destructively when it resurfaces after long decades <strong>of</strong>repression under the ascendency <strong>of</strong> scientific rationalism and positive secular liberalism.Fascism, and other kinds <strong>of</strong> fanatical behaviour, including religiousfundamentalism, racism and cults, are to be expected if spiritual energy is nottrans<strong>for</strong>med by culture, or guided into humane <strong>for</strong>ms by tradition. If notrecognized by culture, it will be taken by dangerous ‘subcultures’, who willexploit the spiritual vitality <strong>for</strong> power, corruption and domination 42 .Essentially, Tacey is calling <strong>for</strong> the culture as a whole to recognise the re-emergentspiritual impulse, to care about its meaning, to make a place <strong>for</strong> it at the centre, and torediscover a new public language to express the relationship to the sacred. He is alsocalling the Christian community (<strong>of</strong> which he himself is a member) and other faithcommunities to get on board, sharing the resources <strong>of</strong> their respective traditions andexpertise rather than judging a spirituality that does not fit their pre-determinedtheological constructs from a distance.More recently, Tacey’s view <strong>of</strong> a ‘spirituality revolution’ has been criticised by theresearch team who conducted the ‘spirituality <strong>of</strong> generation Y’ project (2003–07) 43 asbeing overly optimistic about young people’s interest in spirituality. However, comparingthe findings <strong>of</strong> the research 44 and the questionnaire designs 45 with Tacey’s own critique<strong>of</strong> general religious survey questioning techniques 46 suggests the issue is more one <strong>of</strong>approach and interpretation than <strong>of</strong> actual differences in substance. The Gen Yresearchers tend to conclude that the spiritual impulse is over-rated by Tacey becausetheir own findings show that very few Australian young people are actually involved in42 Ibid, 28.43 See P. Hughes, Putting life together—findings from Australian youth spirituality Research (Fairfield,Vic: Fairfield Press, 2007) and M. Mason , A. Singleton & R. Webber, The spirit <strong>of</strong> generation Y—youngpeople’s spirituality in a changing Australia, (Melbourne : John Garratt Publishing, 2007).44 See http://dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/ccls/sppub/sppub.htm <strong>for</strong> a summary <strong>of</strong> the key findings (linkvalid at time <strong>of</strong> writing, 6.01.09).45 See list <strong>of</strong> tables in Mason et al.46 See Spirituality revolution, 13-14.196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!