12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The centrality <strong>of</strong> scripture, and its nature and purpose in spiritual <strong>for</strong>mationThough Rahner did not regard himself as a biblical scholar, according to Robert Kress 4 ,<strong>for</strong>mer students, colleagues and many <strong>of</strong> his commentators have recognised in histeaching and writing an understated mastery <strong>of</strong> the essence <strong>of</strong> both the overall sense <strong>of</strong>Scripture and the exegetical process. For example, in his discussion on word and spirit inRahner, Thomson refers to the ‘biblical grammar’ <strong>of</strong> the Theological Investigations.My impression is that when the Incarnation is the central theme <strong>of</strong> essays in theInvestigations, the Pneuma, though frequently mentioned, is in thebackground…it is rather when he turns to the ‘third’ mystery, that <strong>of</strong> grace, that amore sustained attention to the (incarnate) Word–Spirit interplay takes place.This, <strong>of</strong> course, reflects the basic structure or grammar <strong>of</strong> the creed, which in turnreflects the basic narrative <strong>of</strong> biblical revelation…The experience <strong>of</strong> grace in theSpirit leads to the incarnate Word, in other words. This creedal and biblicalstructure <strong>of</strong> the ‘Investigations’ would seem to lend some legitimacy to Rahner’sobservation that his style <strong>of</strong> transcendental Christology is ‘closer’ to Scripturethan that <strong>of</strong> ‘classical’ Christology… (Emphasis mine) Here let me speak <strong>of</strong> whatI would call the ‘biblical grammar’ <strong>of</strong> Rahner’s view <strong>of</strong> the Spirit. I use the word‘grammar,’ partly because in the Investigations Rahner somewhat sparingly <strong>of</strong>fers5biblical citations…even when the biblical ‘structure’ is present .Kress <strong>notes</strong> that though Rahner is not an exegete in the technical scholarly sense, he is alover <strong>of</strong> the biblical texts, and widely recognised <strong>for</strong> his capacity to draw theologicalmeaning from the words <strong>of</strong> the Bible. Harvey Egan claims ‘Rahner preached almost daily<strong>for</strong> much <strong>of</strong> his fifty-two years <strong>of</strong> priestly life’6 ; perhaps <strong>this</strong> intense commitment tobiblical preaching most clearly demonstrates his skills in biblical exegesis. Rahner’spreaching legacy and its importance to those who study his thought is evidenced in thepopular publication <strong>of</strong> a liturgically structured, topical selection <strong>of</strong> his homilies, Thegreat church year 7 .4 R. Kress, A Rahner Handbook (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1982), 64.5 W.Thompson, ‘Word & Spirit, hermeneutics and transcendental method: exploring their connections inKarl Rahner,’ Philosophy & Theology 7 (Winter 1992): 193 & 1976 H. Egan, Karl Rahner – Mystic <strong>of</strong> everyday life (New York, Crossroad, 1998), 105.7 Trans. Egan, H. Raffelt, A. ed. (New York: Crossroad, 1993)126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!