Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...
Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...
Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The centrality <strong>of</strong> scripture, and its nature and purpose in spiritual <strong>for</strong>mationThough Rahner did not regard himself as a biblical scholar, according to Robert Kress 4 ,<strong>for</strong>mer students, colleagues and many <strong>of</strong> his commentators have recognised in histeaching and writing an understated mastery <strong>of</strong> the essence <strong>of</strong> both the overall sense <strong>of</strong>Scripture and the exegetical process. For example, in his discussion on word and spirit inRahner, Thomson refers to the ‘biblical grammar’ <strong>of</strong> the Theological Investigations.My impression is that when the Incarnation is the central theme <strong>of</strong> essays in theInvestigations, the Pneuma, though frequently mentioned, is in thebackground…it is rather when he turns to the ‘third’ mystery, that <strong>of</strong> grace, that amore sustained attention to the (incarnate) Word–Spirit interplay takes place.This, <strong>of</strong> course, reflects the basic structure or grammar <strong>of</strong> the creed, which in turnreflects the basic narrative <strong>of</strong> biblical revelation…The experience <strong>of</strong> grace in theSpirit leads to the incarnate Word, in other words. This creedal and biblicalstructure <strong>of</strong> the ‘Investigations’ would seem to lend some legitimacy to Rahner’sobservation that his style <strong>of</strong> transcendental Christology is ‘closer’ to Scripturethan that <strong>of</strong> ‘classical’ Christology… (Emphasis mine) Here let me speak <strong>of</strong> whatI would call the ‘biblical grammar’ <strong>of</strong> Rahner’s view <strong>of</strong> the Spirit. I use the word‘grammar,’ partly because in the Investigations Rahner somewhat sparingly <strong>of</strong>fers5biblical citations…even when the biblical ‘structure’ is present .Kress <strong>notes</strong> that though Rahner is not an exegete in the technical scholarly sense, he is alover <strong>of</strong> the biblical texts, and widely recognised <strong>for</strong> his capacity to draw theologicalmeaning from the words <strong>of</strong> the Bible. Harvey Egan claims ‘Rahner preached almost daily<strong>for</strong> much <strong>of</strong> his fifty-two years <strong>of</strong> priestly life’6 ; perhaps <strong>this</strong> intense commitment tobiblical preaching most clearly demonstrates his skills in biblical exegesis. Rahner’spreaching legacy and its importance to those who study his thought is evidenced in thepopular publication <strong>of</strong> a liturgically structured, topical selection <strong>of</strong> his homilies, Thegreat church year 7 .4 R. Kress, A Rahner Handbook (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1982), 64.5 W.Thompson, ‘Word & Spirit, hermeneutics and transcendental method: exploring their connections inKarl Rahner,’ Philosophy & Theology 7 (Winter 1992): 193 & 1976 H. Egan, Karl Rahner – Mystic <strong>of</strong> everyday life (New York, Crossroad, 1998), 105.7 Trans. Egan, H. Raffelt, A. ed. (New York: Crossroad, 1993)126