12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

expressions <strong>of</strong> mystagogical 142 initiation into explicit faith. Rahner asserts that theseseven sacraments should be accepted as the action–reflection wisdom <strong>of</strong> the churchthrough the ages despite the fact that the huge Protestant section <strong>of</strong> the universalChristian church arrived at a different conclusion long ago. Rahner argues inclusively thatsacramental experience is not defined or limited by reference to these expressions, yetassumes exclusively that the authority <strong>of</strong> the Roman Catholic position on seven, not two,sacraments is not up <strong>for</strong> debate. Rahner is the tireless proponent <strong>of</strong> the idea that RomanCatholic teachings must and should be re-interpreted, re-imagined and expressed in newways, in<strong>for</strong>med by Roman Catholic dialogue with other Christians, non-Christianreligions and the broader, modern, scientific worldview. Nevertheless, <strong>for</strong> Rahner,Roman Catholic dogma itself must always be the fixed point <strong>of</strong> departure and return inthe revisionary process.In light <strong>of</strong> the hierarchical structure <strong>of</strong> Rahner’s universalism, it is little wonder thatdetractors such as Kung take such deep <strong>of</strong>fence at its perceived paternalism and distancefrom the actual religious consciousness <strong>of</strong> non-Christians. Kung and Rahner’s historicfalling out was over the issue <strong>of</strong> the infallibility <strong>of</strong> the Roman Catholic magisterium 143 ;Rahner’s default to the magisterium is also a stumbling block to the reception <strong>of</strong> his ideasby Protestant thinkers 144 .Evaluating the criticisms <strong>of</strong> Rahner’s universal Christian spirituality <strong>of</strong> silenceTo what extent do the criticisms <strong>of</strong> Rahner’s idea <strong>of</strong> a universal, silent experience <strong>of</strong>Christian spirituality deter Christians from embracing <strong>this</strong> aspect <strong>of</strong> Rahner’s spirituality<strong>of</strong> silence?142 ‘Mystagogical’: Facilitating participation in the life <strong>of</strong> the Spirit as it is expressed in the everyday,explained by Rahner in one interview in the following way: ‘bringing … what we believe into the closestpossible unity with … the act <strong>of</strong> faith itself, and thus showing what the tenets <strong>of</strong> faith actually mean <strong>for</strong> theindividual and society’, Ibid.143 For a fascinating and quite personal account <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> see Bruce Van Vorst, ‘Kung and Rahner: duellingover infallibility’ and ‘Follow-up on the Kung-Rahner feud,’ The Christian Century, 88, 20 (May 1971):617-622 & 88, 34 (Aug 1971): 997-1000.144 See, The Cambridge companion to Rahner, 220-221.172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!