12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cross 96 —God’s silence is a language about which the contemporary Christianmainstream has much to learn—and share with Western postmodern culture.The parable <strong>of</strong> the angry shoemaker and final reflectionsThis parable summarises much <strong>of</strong> my understanding about the spiritual needs <strong>of</strong> Westernpostmodern culture, and how Karl Rahner’s ideas provide a valuable resource <strong>for</strong>contemporary people searching <strong>for</strong> a meaningful spirituality.The parable <strong>of</strong> the angry shoemakerThere was once a shoemaker who operated in a small village, servicing the needs<strong>of</strong> the villagers with regard to their footwear. The relationship between theshoemaker and his customers was functional and com<strong>for</strong>table without beingparticularly warm or dynamic. Business always continued at a steady pacebecause his was the only footwear outlet in town, and everybody wore shoes.One fateful day, however, things began to change. Some remarkable visitorsarrived at the village, remarkable because they were not wearing shoes. Thevillagers had never seen anyone go barefoot be<strong>for</strong>e. The shoemaker wasimmediately suspicious <strong>of</strong> the barefoot itinerants. His suspicion turned to ragewhen he realised that the visitors were not only going barefoot themselves, butactively encouraging the villagers to do the same by extolling the sensate virtues<strong>of</strong> shoeless freedom.Many <strong>of</strong> the villagers were fascinated by the radical suggestion <strong>of</strong> the barefootvisitors, but they were also afraid, because the shoemaker filled their heads withdire warnings about what might happen to people who wore no shoes! ‘Your toeswill fall <strong>of</strong>f!’; ‘Your skin will burn!’; ‘Your feet will completely lose their shape!’The visitors, however, laughed at the shoemaker’s ranting and pointed out to thevillagers the simple fact that none <strong>of</strong> these predictions <strong>of</strong> doom had come true intheir case.Many <strong>of</strong> the people began to experiment with taking <strong>of</strong>f their shoes, just <strong>for</strong> shortperiods at first, then <strong>for</strong> longer periods, until eventually many people would onlyput on their shoes once or twice a year—just <strong>for</strong> special occasions. Someabandoned the practice <strong>of</strong> shoe-wearing all together, revelling in the newsensations <strong>of</strong> grass and sand and water against their bare flesh and deciding thatnever again would they allow their feet to be constricted by heavy leather casings.96 Adapted from ‘The Father spoke one word from all eternity and he spoke it in silence, and it is in silencethat we hear it’, C. Bourgeault Centering prayer and awakening (Plymouth, UK: Cowley Publications,2004), see 5, and accompanying endnote.219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!