12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

established and errors refuted by the diligent application <strong>of</strong> St. Thomas’sprinciples. Such a use <strong>of</strong> his work might well have horrified Aquinas himself,since it left no room <strong>for</strong> new questions 38 .Rahner’s <strong>thesis</strong>—and in fact his whole life’s work—was directed precisely against <strong>this</strong>legalistic use <strong>of</strong> tradition.The footnote to <strong>this</strong> initial clash between ‘the old and the new wineskins’ is that MartinHonecker is described as ‘a long <strong>for</strong>gotten pr<strong>of</strong>essor at the University <strong>of</strong> Freiburg’ 39 (inan article pr<strong>of</strong>iling Rahner, then in his seventies). By contrast, Rahner’s rejected <strong>thesis</strong>was published in 1939 (subsequently translated into several languages including Englishas Spirit in the World). It laid the foundation <strong>for</strong> Rahner’s international writing, teachingand speaking career that has resulted in an estimated 4000 publications under his nameand a universal reputation as one <strong>of</strong> the most significant Catholic—and indeedChristian—theologians <strong>of</strong> the 20 th century. Rahner himself recalled that the outcome <strong>of</strong>Honecker’s decision was hardly debilitating on either a personal or public level:My dissertation director, Martin Honecker, flunked me…Because I had beenreassigned from philosophy to teach theology at Innsbruck, <strong>this</strong> didn’t upset me<strong>for</strong> long…My rejected <strong>thesis</strong> was then published without my receiving a40doctorate…So <strong>this</strong> failure did not appreciably affect my self-esteem .In the final phase <strong>of</strong> Rahner’s <strong>for</strong>mal education, his Jesuit superiors directed him to returnto Innsbruck to complete a doctorate in theology as preparation <strong>for</strong> teaching theology.Building on the foundation <strong>of</strong> his earlier patristic studies, Rahner produced his <strong>thesis</strong>, TheOrigin <strong>of</strong> the Church as Second Eve from the Side <strong>of</strong> Christ the Second Adam – AnInvestigation <strong>of</strong> the Typological Significance <strong>of</strong> John 19.34, within a relatively shortperiod. His second <strong>thesis</strong> was accepted (though ironically it remains unpublished);together with some prior published articles on the spiritual theology <strong>of</strong> Origen, Evagrius,Ponticus and Bonaventure, <strong>this</strong> work qualified him to begin teaching dogmatics atInnsbruck, the university that had finally granted him his doctorate.Following a landmark series <strong>of</strong> lectures on ‘The Basis <strong>of</strong> a Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Religion’ (laterpublished as Hörer Des Wortes, ‘hearers <strong>of</strong> the word’), delivered to the Seventh Salzburg38 ‘Quiet Mover <strong>of</strong> the Catholic Church’, 66.39 Ibid.40 I Remember, 42-43.11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!