12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Central to Rahner’s thinking is the notion that what is at the core <strong>of</strong> everyperson’s deepest experience, what haunts every human heart, is a God whosemystery, light, and love have embraced the total person. God works in everyperson’s life as the One to whom we say our inmost yes or no. We may deny <strong>this</strong>,ignore it or repress it, but deep down we know that God is in love with us and weare all at least secretly in love with one another 62 .Egan goes on to define Rahner’s central theological view as ‘mystical’ because itattempts to compress, to simplify, and to concentrate all Christian beliefs and practices byindicating how they evoke the experience <strong>of</strong> God’s loving self-communication to us in63the crucified and risen Christ’ . In a similar vein, Modras proposes thatRahner’s theology <strong>of</strong> grace—God’s universal self-giving addressing us, <strong>of</strong>tenanonymously, at the innermost core <strong>of</strong> our beings—constitutes the unifying thread64that pervades and colours virtually all the rest <strong>of</strong> his thought .Rahner makes various statements about central aspects <strong>of</strong> his thinking. He discusses thehistorical notion in Catholic theology <strong>of</strong> the incomprehensibility <strong>of</strong> God as taking a moreradical, controlling centre in contemporary theology65 : Rahner’s way <strong>of</strong> saying that themystical experience <strong>of</strong> God is a guiding hermeneutic <strong>for</strong> the interpretation <strong>of</strong> statementsabout God.Rahner also mentions the approach to thinking that he learned from his philosophicalteacher and mentor, Martin Heidegger.One may perhaps say that it is not specific doctrines that I have taken fromHeidegger, but rather a style <strong>of</strong> thinking and <strong>of</strong> investigating which has provedmost valuable. This may be described as a method or approach by which one doesnot examine dogmatic truths as evidence derived from positive sources, but oneseeks to construct a syn<strong>thesis</strong>. One takes the various dogmatic propositions andreduces them to certain fundamental principles 66 .Rahner does not refer to the philosophical Heidegger as a source <strong>of</strong> theological contentbut as a mentor <strong>for</strong> a process <strong>of</strong> thinking about theological content. This processcontributed to what has become known as Rahner’s ‘transcendental approach’ (discussed62 Translator’s introduction to Rahner, I remember, 3.63 Ibid, 4.64 Modras, Ignatian humanism, 228.65 Ibid, 58.66Karl Rahner in dialogue, 1986, 13.20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!