12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

proximity, the silence that leads each human person to true rest, actualisation 4 andfulfilment 5 .Rahner’s theology <strong>of</strong> mystery: the framework <strong>for</strong> discussionRahner introduces his series <strong>of</strong> three lectures on ‘The concept <strong>of</strong> mystery in Catholictheology’ with an opening salvo against what he labels the ‘traditional Catholic view’.People <strong>of</strong> the modern world, says Rahner,find the mystery <strong>of</strong> God so all-embracing that they cannot easily bring themselvesto accept a multitude <strong>of</strong> mysteries which look very much like the complications <strong>of</strong>human reasoning which has tied itself up in knots 6 .This short statement reveals the pastoral bias in Rahner’s theology, his deep concern <strong>for</strong>the posture <strong>of</strong> the Church in its role as spiritual guide to everyday women and men, andimplies the essence <strong>of</strong> his theological view: humans live and have their being in thecontext <strong>of</strong> anthropological transcendence and the supernatural existential. Consequently,it provides the basic framework <strong>for</strong> exploring the meaning <strong>of</strong> his theology <strong>of</strong> mystery.This exploration begins with Rahner’s anthropological theology and its relevance to hisconcept <strong>of</strong> mystery, and uses the exploratory framework drawn from the lectures to tracehis argument <strong>for</strong> a reconstruction or redemption <strong>of</strong> mystery as a pastoral theologicalconcept. This analysis reveals that Rahner tilts his rhetorical lance towards the slaying <strong>of</strong>two ideological dragons:a) the rigid, hierarchical propositional posture <strong>of</strong> a Church that demands an uncriticaladherence to ill-in<strong>for</strong>med expressions <strong>of</strong> dogma;b) the secular rationalism <strong>of</strong> modern thought that fails to recognise the origin, goaland limitations <strong>of</strong> its intellectual capacity.That Rahner’s theology <strong>of</strong> mystery begins and ends in a spirituality <strong>of</strong> silence isdemonstrated and crystallised through a consideration <strong>of</strong> the implications arising from4 ‘Actualisation’ a word used by Rahner to express the idea that Jesus Christ is the natural completion andfulfilment <strong>of</strong> what it means to be fully human and that, through Jesus, it is possible <strong>for</strong> each <strong>of</strong> us toexperience the fullness <strong>of</strong> human life through participation in the divine life.5 This idea is reflected in the following reading: K Rahner, ‘God is no scientific <strong>for</strong>mula’, in The content <strong>of</strong>the faith – the best <strong>of</strong> Karl Rahner’s theological writings, Lehmann, K. & Raffelt , A. eds. (New York:Crossroad, 1993), 228.6 K Rahner, Theological investigations, Vol. IV, Trans. K. Smyth (London: Darton, Longman & Todd,1966), 37.80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!