12.07.2015 Views

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

Introductory notes for readers of this thesis - Theses - Flinders ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The counter to Rahner’s complex, ‘scientific’ 58 theologising: his far more readable bookson prayer, spirituality, and his recorded homilies. Here it seems that Rahner, like IgnatiusLoyola (the founder <strong>of</strong> the order), writes down what has been helpful in his own spirituallife and invites others to use these writings as a starting point and guide to their ownspiritual journey. It is <strong>of</strong>ten noted that Rahner’s first and last books are collections <strong>of</strong>prayers—one written at the beginning <strong>of</strong> his career (Encounters with silence) and onepublished at the very end (Prayers <strong>for</strong> a lifetime). Modras comments that these twoprayer books are ‘no less important or substantiative than his more scholarly essays’ 59 ,echoing the common sentiment expressed by various Rahner scholars 60 that the essence<strong>of</strong> Rahner’s thinking can be accessed through his devotional works; <strong>this</strong> genre allowsRahner’s underlying intellectual arguments to be expressed more implicitly and hisspecifically Christian vocabulary to be expressed more explicitly 61 .As reading Rahner in both genres reveals the echoes <strong>of</strong> each in the other, <strong>this</strong> <strong>thesis</strong>argues that one theologian is present in two genres: there is never a time when Rahnerwrites with an exclusive bent to intellectual scholarship, or when his intellectual viewsare not an expression <strong>of</strong> his devotional experience <strong>of</strong> God.Content—theological compression and unfoldingRahner has a reputation as a theologian <strong>of</strong> great breadth in the scope <strong>of</strong> his topicalconcerns. It is also <strong>of</strong>ten said that he is not ‘systematic’: it is difficult to identify aparticular theme or structure <strong>for</strong> his overall work.Although <strong>this</strong> is true in part, there is also a significant view that Rahner’s multi-faceted,complex project does indeed reveal a centralising principle and locus. Egan explains hisview <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> central principle as follows:58 A word that Rahner used in relation to the intellectual demands <strong>of</strong> Christian theologising.59 Ibid, 205.60 See <strong>for</strong> example Vorgrimler, Understanding Karl Rahner, 10; D. Marmion, A spirituality <strong>of</strong> everydayfaith – a theological investigation <strong>of</strong> the notion <strong>of</strong> spirituality in Karl Rahner (Louvain: Peeters Press,1998), 41-53; J. O’Donnell, Karl Rahner – Life in the Spirit (Rome: Gregorian University Press, 2004), 8.61 For a discussion on Rahner’s explicit Christian vocabulary in his ‘spiritual’ writings see, J. Bacik, ‘IsRahner obsolete ? – what his critics get wrong’, Commonweal 132 (2) (2005): 23.19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!