12.07.2015 Views

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to <strong>the</strong> north, <strong>the</strong> main mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia rests on Leach CanyonFormation. Because <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn margin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> megabreccia (and underlyingregional ash-flow tuffs) is erosional in nature, we do not know <strong>the</strong>ir sou<strong>the</strong>rndepositional limit. However, because debris from <strong>the</strong> Leach Canyon Formation ismissing in areas mapped as QTbx in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> Cedar Breaks NationalMonument and at and near Blowhard Mountain, it seems likely that <strong>the</strong> LeachCanyon did not extend much fur<strong>the</strong>r south than its present-day outcrop. Because<strong>the</strong>re is no evidence for a post-Leach Canyon (but pre-Markagunt megabreccia)unconformity that cuts out strata southward across <strong>the</strong> west edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Markagunt Plateau, lead-author Biek interprets <strong>the</strong>se large Isom blocks to belandslide remnants that are at a lower structural level than <strong>the</strong> main mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Markagunt megabreccia, inferring that <strong>the</strong> blocks reflect late Tertiary andQuaternary northward retreat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> erosional escarpment that stretches fromBrian Head peak eastward to Haycock Mountain. Thus in this view, similar tothat suggested by Moore (1992) and Sable and Maldonado (1997a), <strong>the</strong> blocks areremobilized parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia, <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn extent <strong>of</strong> whichwas emplaced on a paleohigh <strong>of</strong> Brian Head strata that served to constrain <strong>the</strong>sou<strong>the</strong>rn limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Isom and Leach regional ash-flow tuffs; <strong>the</strong> megabreccia hassince been let down to its present position principally by landsliding in lateTertiary and Quaternary time, with smectitic clays <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brian Head Formationproviding <strong>the</strong> weak shear surface for downslope movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blocks.Hatfield and o<strong>the</strong>rs (2003), Moore and o<strong>the</strong>rs (2004), and Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs (inpreparation), however, interpreted <strong>the</strong> blocks as a bona fide part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MioceneMarkagunt megabreccia, which thus must have been emplaced as far south asBlowhard Mountain over a significant Miocene unconformity; subsequentwea<strong>the</strong>ring and sapping <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> megabreccia and underlying Claron Formation <strong>the</strong>nspread debris southward to <strong>the</strong> area beyond State Route 14. Our differences ininterpretation reflect this uncertainty.QTaf High-level fan alluvium (Pleistocene and Pliocene?) – Poorly to moderatelysorted, non-stratified, subangular to subrounded, boulder- to clay-size sediment;mapped in <strong>the</strong> Sevier Valley sou<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> Panguitch, where it forms deeplydissected surfaces; deposited principally as debris flows and debris floods;exposed thickness is about 100 feet (30 m).QTap High-level pediment alluvium (Pleistocene and Pliocene?) – Moderately sorted,subrounded to rounded pebble to boulder gravel and sand that forms a gently eastdipping,locally resistant cap over <strong>the</strong> Limerock Canyon Formation (Tl) and upperTertiary fan alluvium (Taf) near <strong>the</strong> east margin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt Plateau; surface<strong>of</strong> deposit typically covered by veneer <strong>of</strong> pebble and cobble residuum; divisibleinto two different levels (Moore and Straub, 1995), but undivided here due to mapscale; deposited principally as debris flows, debris floods, and in ephemeralstream channels; probably less than 20 feet (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!