TmMarkagunt megabreccia, undivided – The Markagunt megabreccia (restrictedusage following Sable and Maldonado, 1997a) is undivided where exposures areinsufficient to delineate bedrock units, and in <strong>the</strong> remote northwest part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Flanigan Arch quadrangle; most areas mapped as Tm consist predominantly <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Isom Formation (which is typically pervasively and finely fractured so thatit wea<strong>the</strong>rs to grussy soils and rounded hills), but locally includes Wah WahSprings and Brian Head strata, and, north <strong>of</strong> Panguitch Lake, large amounts <strong>of</strong>mafic block and ash-flow tuff, volcaniclastic sandstone, and pebblyconglomerate; on top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt Plateau, north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latitude <strong>of</strong>Panguitch Lake, Tm is unconformable on <strong>the</strong> resistant, planar, gently eastdippingsurface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Isom Formation, but between Brian Head peak and ClearCreek, it unconformably overlies <strong>the</strong> Leach Canyon Formation; at <strong>the</strong> west edge<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plateau, south <strong>of</strong> Iron Peak, it unconformably overlies Brian Head strata;maximum thickness exceeds 500 feet (150 m).Tm(Ta) Markagunt megabreccia – middle Tertiary alluvium component –Volcaniclastic conglomerate and pebbly sandstone on <strong>the</strong> north flank <strong>of</strong>Haycock Mountain that may be a coarse alluvial facies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mount DuttonFormation; contains quartzite cobbles and small boulders in <strong>the</strong> basal part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>deposits; typically forms cobble-covered hillsides, but is locally wellconsolidatedin exposures on <strong>the</strong> southwest side <strong>of</strong> Haycock Mountain; thismiddle Tertiary alluvium that locally caps Haycock Mountain is likely olderthan similar alluvium under <strong>the</strong> Haycock Mountain Tuff described by Anderson(1993); as mapped here, <strong>the</strong> alluvium (Tm[Ta]) at Haycock Mountain overliesand is in turn locally overlain by Isom Formation (Tm[Ti]), all interpreted to bepart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper plate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia; additionally, thisalluvium is as much as 800 feet (250 m) above Panguitch Creek and <strong>the</strong> typesection <strong>of</strong> Haycock Mountain Tuff (thus to have postdated emplacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>megabreccia, <strong>the</strong> alluvium we map as [Tm(Ta)]would have had to completelyfill <strong>the</strong> ancestral Panguitch Creek drainage and <strong>the</strong>n been exhumed, but we seeno compelling evidence for this interpretation); maximum thickness in this areais probably about 100 feet (30 m).Tm(Td) Markagunt megabreccia – Mount Dutton Formation component – Massiveblock and ash-flow tuff <strong>of</strong> mafic and intermediate composition, volcaniclasticpebble to boulder conglomerate, and minor tuffaceous sandstone; characterizedby brown or locally reddish-brown hues; mapped northwest <strong>of</strong> HaycockMountain; tentatively interpreted to be part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia, butmay contain strata that postdate emplacement <strong>of</strong> megabreccia (ongoing mappingin areas to <strong>the</strong> north may resolve this uncertainty); maximum thickness in thisarea is probably about 300 feet (100 m).Tm(Thm) Markagunt megabreccia – Haycock Mountain Tuff component – Consists<strong>of</strong> two cooling units: lower unit is white to very light pink, unwelded, crystalpoorrhyolite tuff that is overlain by light-pink, poorly welded, moderately33
esistant crystal-poor rhyolite tuff; both contain common pumice fragments andlithic fragments <strong>of</strong> black, aphanatic, mafic volcanic rock; forms gently eastdippingledge that at its type section overlies apparently undeformedvolcaniclastic conglomerate and elsewhere overlies deformed Bear ValleyFormation sandstone; petrographically and chemically similar to <strong>the</strong> LeachCanyon Formation (see <strong>the</strong> Leach Canyon Formation unit description fordetails); yielded 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age <strong>of</strong> 22.75 ± 0.12 Ma (Ed Sable, U.S. <strong>Geologic</strong>al<strong>Survey</strong>, unpublished data, 1996); Anderson (1993) interpreted <strong>the</strong> HaycockMountain Tuff to postdate emplacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia, butlead-author Biek tentatively interprets <strong>the</strong> tuff as riding largely undisturbed in<strong>the</strong> upper plate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> megabreccia; mapped north <strong>of</strong> Haycock Mountain; about35 feet (11 m) thick.Tm(Tbvs) Markagunt megabreccia – Bear Valley volcaniclastic strata component –White to light-gray, moderately to well-sorted, fine- to medium-grainedvolcaniclastic sandstone having high-angle cross-beds, and similarly coloredtuffaceous mudstone and siltstone; typically pervasively deformed by faults andfolds indicative <strong>of</strong> deformation as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia; mappednorth <strong>of</strong> Haycock Mountain; exposed thickness as much as 120 feet (35 m).Tm(Tbvt) Markagunt megabreccia – Bear Valley ash-flow tuff component – White,unwelded, massive, likely rhyolitic ash-flow tuff that contains common pebblesizelithic fragments <strong>of</strong> intermediate volcanic rocks and rounded quartzitepebbles; mapped north <strong>of</strong> Haycock Mountain; exposed thickness as much as100 feet (30 m).Tm(Tl) Markagunt megabreccia – Limerock Canyon Formation component –White and light-gray, locally tuffaceous, volcaniclastic sandstone, pebblysandstone, mudstone, minor tuffaceous limestone, and local multi-huedchalcedony; mapped on <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast side <strong>of</strong> Haycock Mountain, where it isfaulted and folded, indicative <strong>of</strong> deformation as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markaguntmegabreccia; we are uncertain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Limerock CanyonFormation at Haycock Mountain (it is possible that <strong>the</strong>se beds are in <strong>the</strong> pre-30Ma Brian Head Formation, or are part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 24 Ma Bear Valley Formation, orthat <strong>the</strong> Limerock Canyon has a wider age range than <strong>the</strong> 20 to 21 Ma age wecan now demonstrate), and this awaits fur<strong>the</strong>r geochemical and radiometric agecontrol; exposed thickness as much as 150 feet (45 m).Tm(Tdm) Markagunt megabreccia – Mafic block and ash-flow tuff <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MountDutton Formation component – Dark-gray, vesicular, basaltic andesite andbasalt present as angular cobble- to boulder-size blocks floating in a light-graysandy matrix <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same composition; monolithic; minor basaltic scoria, likelya rafted block, is present north <strong>of</strong> Bunker Creek in <strong>the</strong> NE1/4NE1/4 section 12,T. 36 S., R. 8 W.; mapped between Panguitch Lake and Sidney Peaks where itunconformably overlies 24 Ma Leach Canyon Formation (Tql); in <strong>the</strong> BunkerCreek drainage west <strong>of</strong> Panguitch Lake, <strong>the</strong> map unit is overlain by Isom34
- Page 1 and 2: ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !
- Page 3 and 4: MAP UNIT DESCRIPTIONSQUATERNARYAllu
- Page 5 and 6: Qafc Coalesced fan alluvium of Paro
- Page 7 and 8: glacial deposits and features that
- Page 9 and 10: (Tbhv) and Dakota (Kd and Ktd) Form
- Page 11 and 12: typically mapped where lava flows d
- Page 13 and 14: that range in age from Miocene to H
- Page 15 and 16: fronts (except at Dry Valley, immed
- Page 17 and 18: the quadrangle; no fault that postd
- Page 19 and 20: Qbw, QbwcWater Canyon lava flow and
- Page 21 and 22: others, 2007); lava flow is typical
- Page 23 and 24: Mahogany Hill, about 500 feet (150
- Page 25 and 26: lava flow (Tbbm) that conceal the u
- Page 27 and 28: TERTIARYpreserved in down-dropped b
- Page 29 and 30: and Rowley and others (in preparati
- Page 31 and 32: field (or possibly coeval batholith
- Page 33: hidden by shadow; we tentatively as
- Page 37 and 38: thickness uncertain but outcrop pat
- Page 39 and 40: divide between Red Creek and Little
- Page 41 and 42: pyroxene (5%), and sanidine (trace)
- Page 43 and 44: unconformityThe Leach Canyon Format
- Page 45 and 46: unconformityMa (Best and others, 19
- Page 47 and 48: interval, and a lower limestone int
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 3. View northwest to North V
- Page 51 and 52: dark-yellowish-orange, grayish-pink
- Page 53 and 54: TKgc Grand Castle Formation, undivi
- Page 55 and 56: track (the latter found by Eric Rob
- Page 57 and 58: noted by Moore and Straub (2001) an
- Page 59 and 60: shoreface, beach, lagoonal, and est
- Page 61 and 62: water deposits of Cenomanian age (N
- Page 63 and 64: 62Figure 7. Cedar Mountain Formatio
- Page 65 and 66: leached white under the Cretaceous
- Page 67 and 68: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis geologic map is
- Page 69 and 70: Anderson, R.E., and Christenson, G.
- Page 71 and 72: Biek, R.F., Rowley, P.D., Hayden, J
- Page 73 and 74: field guide (The Mackin Volume): Ut
- Page 75 and 76: 2001, Cretaceous and early Tertiary
- Page 77 and 78: Hacker, D.B., Rowley, P.D., Blank,
- Page 79 and 80: Kurlich, R.A., III, 1990, Geology o
- Page 81 and 82: Maldonado, F., and Moore, R.C., 199
- Page 83 and 84: Flagstaff-Green River basins [abs.]
- Page 85 and 86:
elation to other igneous centers in
- Page 87 and 88:
Schulman, E., 1956, Dendroclimatic
- Page 89:
Van Kooten, G.K., 1988, Structure a
- Page 92:
113°00'112°00'15BV20R i v e rCCNP