Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Straight Cliffs Formation (Kst). The thin slope <strong>of</strong> Tropic represents <strong>the</strong>maximum incursion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>West</strong>ern Interior Seaway in Late Cretaceous (early Turonian)time. Underlying Dakota strata – deposited as an overall regressive unit <strong>of</strong> floodplain,estuarine, lagoonal, and swamp environments <strong>of</strong> a coastal plain – record <strong>the</strong>encroachment <strong>of</strong> that seaway, whereas overlying Tibbet Canyon strata were deposited inan overall progradational sequence <strong>of</strong> marginal-marine and beach environmentsfollowing retreat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>West</strong>ern Interior Sea.Several normal faults cut strata <strong>of</strong> <strong>Map</strong>le Canyon, which partly follows <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>nd <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Summit Mountain graben. Tcr (red member) and Tcw (white member) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Claron Formation; regional ash-flow tuffs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Leach Canyon Formation (Tql) andIsom Formation (Ti), which overlie <strong>the</strong> vegetated Brian Head Formation (Tbhv), areunconformably overlain by <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia (Tm).KtdKdTropic Shale and Dakota Formation, undivided (Upper Cretaceous, Turonianto Cenomanian) − Undivided in Cedar Canyon where <strong>the</strong> Tropic Shale is a fewfeet to at most a few tens <strong>of</strong> feet thick.Dakota Formation (Upper Cretaceous, Cenomanian) − Interbedded, slope- andledge-forming sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, claystone, carbonaceous shale,coal, and marl; sandstone is yellowish brown or locally white, thin to very thickbedded, fine to medium grained; includes several prominent cliff-formingsandstone beds each several tens <strong>of</strong> feet thick in <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation,<strong>the</strong> upper one <strong>of</strong> which may correspond to <strong>the</strong> “sugarledge sandstone” <strong>of</strong> Cashion(1961); mudstone and claystone are gray to yellowish brown and commonlysmectitic; oyster coquina beds, clams, and gastropods, including large Craginiasp., are common, especially in <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> section; thin marl beds above<strong>the</strong> “sugarledge sandstone” locally contain small, distinctive gastropods withbeaded edge (Admetopsis n. sp. indicative <strong>of</strong> a latest Cenomanian brackishenvironment [Eaton and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2001]); Dakota strata are typically poorly exposedand involved in large landslides in <strong>the</strong> Cedar Canyon area; most workers divide<strong>the</strong> Dakota Formation into three members, <strong>the</strong> lower one <strong>of</strong> which we re-assign to<strong>the</strong> Cedar Mountain Formation and <strong>the</strong> upper two <strong>of</strong> which we combine given <strong>the</strong>difficulty <strong>of</strong> mapping <strong>the</strong>ir mutual contact; upper contact placed at <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>thin marl beds overlying <strong>the</strong> “sugarledge sandstone;” represents an overallregressive sequence, <strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> which was deposited in floodplain and riverenvironments, whereas <strong>the</strong> upper part represents estuarine, lagoonal, and swampenvironments <strong>of</strong> a coastal plain (Gustason, 1989; Eaton and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2001; Laurinand Sageman, 2001; Tibert and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2003); Gustavson (1989), based in part onstudy <strong>of</strong> Cedar Canyon exposures, was <strong>the</strong> first to correlate fluvial packages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Dakota with orbital cycles <strong>of</strong> marine sedimentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deeper parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>West</strong>ern Interior Sea; Laurin and Sageman (2001) expanded on that work,constructing a high resolution temporal and stratigraphic framework <strong>of</strong> middleCretaceous marginal-marine deposits – <strong>the</strong>y documented changes in shorelineposition and also linked <strong>the</strong>se changes to rhythmic, Milankovitch-drivendeposition <strong>of</strong> marine limestone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>West</strong>ern Interior Seaway; invertebrate andpalynomorph fossil assemblages indicate shallow-marine, brackish, and fresh-59
water deposits <strong>of</strong> Cenomanian age (Nichols, 1997); based on map measurements,about 1300 to 1400 feet (400-425 m) thick at <strong>the</strong> south end <strong>of</strong> Jones Hill west <strong>of</strong><strong>Map</strong>le Canyon.KiKcmIron Springs Formation, undivided (Upper Cretaceous, Santonian or lowerCampanian to Cenomanian) – Interbedded, ledge-forming, calcareous, crossbedded,fine- to medium-grained sandstone and less-resistant, poorly exposedsandstone, siltstone, and mudstone present in <strong>the</strong> Red Hills at <strong>the</strong> west edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>map area; <strong>the</strong> formation is variously colored grayish orange, pale yellowishorange, dark yellowish orange, white, pale reddish brown, and greenish gray andis locally stained by iron-manganese oxides; Liesegang banding is common in <strong>the</strong>sandstone beds; sandstone beds range from quartz arenite to litharenite (Fillmore,1991; Goldstrand, 1992); <strong>the</strong> entire formation wea<strong>the</strong>rs to repetitive, thick tabularsandstone beds and thinner interbedded mudstone; lower part (in <strong>the</strong> upper plate<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Springs thrust) contains numerous oyster coquina beds commonly 1 to3 feet (0.3-1 m) thick; upper contact with <strong>the</strong> upper conglomerate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> GrandCastle Formation is difficult to map on <strong>the</strong> east and south sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Red Hillsdue to abundant TKgcu-derived colluvium and faults; deposited principally inbraided-stream and floodplain environments <strong>of</strong> a coastal plain (Johnson, 1984;Fillmore, 1991; Eaton and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2001; Milner and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2006); mapped in <strong>the</strong>Red Hills where it is correlated to <strong>the</strong> Dakota Formation, Tropic Shale, andStraight Cliffs Formation (Eaton, 1999; Eaton and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2001); age fromGoldstrand (1994) and an ash that is 712 feet (217 m) below <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>formation in Parowan Canyon (here reassigned to <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> StraightCliffs Formation), which yielded an 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age <strong>of</strong> 83.0 ± 1.1 Ma (Eaton ando<strong>the</strong>rs, 1999b); lower Iron Springs strata (in <strong>the</strong> upper plate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Springsthrust) may be associated with <strong>the</strong> maximum transgression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greenhorn Sea<strong>of</strong> late Cenomanian or early Turonian age (Eaton and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1997; Eaton, 1999);Milner and o<strong>the</strong>rs (2006) reported on dinosaur tracks in upper Iron Springs stratanear Parowan Gap, and also noted a diverse assemblage <strong>of</strong> plant fossils, bivalves,gastropods, turtles, fish, and trace fossils suggestive <strong>of</strong> upper Santonian to earlyCampanian age (Milner and Spears [2007] mistakenly reported an early Turonianage for <strong>the</strong>se same beds); incomplete sections are about 2500 feet (750 m) thick in<strong>the</strong> Red Hills (Maldonado and Williams, 1993a) and about 1100 feet (335 m)thick in Parowan Canyon (Maldonado and Moore, 1995), but <strong>the</strong> entire formationis about 3500 to 4000 feet (1070-1220 m) thick in <strong>the</strong> Pine Valley Mountains(Cook, 1960).Cedar Mountain Formation (Cretaceous, Cenomanian to Albian) − Consists <strong>of</strong>a basal pebble conglomerate overlain by brightly colored variegated mudstone inCedar Canyon. Mudstone is variegated gray, purplish-red, and reddish-brown,distinctly different from <strong>the</strong> gray and yellowish-brown hues <strong>of</strong> overlying Dakotastrata; clay is smectitic and wea<strong>the</strong>rs to “popcorn-like” soils; includes minor lightgrayto dark-yellowish-brown, fine- to medium-grained channel sandstone. Basalconglomerate is grayish brown and typically poorly cemented and non-resistant;clasts are subrounded to rounded, pebble- to small-cobble-size quartzite, chert,60
- Page 1 and 2:
! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !
- Page 3 and 4:
MAP UNIT DESCRIPTIONSQUATERNARYAllu
- Page 5 and 6:
Qafc Coalesced fan alluvium of Paro
- Page 7 and 8:
glacial deposits and features that
- Page 9 and 10: (Tbhv) and Dakota (Kd and Ktd) Form
- Page 11 and 12: typically mapped where lava flows d
- Page 13 and 14: that range in age from Miocene to H
- Page 15 and 16: fronts (except at Dry Valley, immed
- Page 17 and 18: the quadrangle; no fault that postd
- Page 19 and 20: Qbw, QbwcWater Canyon lava flow and
- Page 21 and 22: others, 2007); lava flow is typical
- Page 23 and 24: Mahogany Hill, about 500 feet (150
- Page 25 and 26: lava flow (Tbbm) that conceal the u
- Page 27 and 28: TERTIARYpreserved in down-dropped b
- Page 29 and 30: and Rowley and others (in preparati
- Page 31 and 32: field (or possibly coeval batholith
- Page 33 and 34: hidden by shadow; we tentatively as
- Page 35 and 36: esistant crystal-poor rhyolite tuff
- Page 37 and 38: thickness uncertain but outcrop pat
- Page 39 and 40: divide between Red Creek and Little
- Page 41 and 42: pyroxene (5%), and sanidine (trace)
- Page 43 and 44: unconformityThe Leach Canyon Format
- Page 45 and 46: unconformityMa (Best and others, 19
- Page 47 and 48: interval, and a lower limestone int
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 3. View northwest to North V
- Page 51 and 52: dark-yellowish-orange, grayish-pink
- Page 53 and 54: TKgc Grand Castle Formation, undivi
- Page 55 and 56: track (the latter found by Eric Rob
- Page 57 and 58: noted by Moore and Straub (2001) an
- Page 59: shoreface, beach, lagoonal, and est
- Page 63 and 64: 62Figure 7. Cedar Mountain Formatio
- Page 65 and 66: leached white under the Cretaceous
- Page 67 and 68: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis geologic map is
- Page 69 and 70: Anderson, R.E., and Christenson, G.
- Page 71 and 72: Biek, R.F., Rowley, P.D., Hayden, J
- Page 73 and 74: field guide (The Mackin Volume): Ut
- Page 75 and 76: 2001, Cretaceous and early Tertiary
- Page 77 and 78: Hacker, D.B., Rowley, P.D., Blank,
- Page 79 and 80: Kurlich, R.A., III, 1990, Geology o
- Page 81 and 82: Maldonado, F., and Moore, R.C., 199
- Page 83 and 84: Flagstaff-Green River basins [abs.]
- Page 85 and 86: elation to other igneous centers in
- Page 87 and 88: Schulman, E., 1956, Dendroclimatic
- Page 89: Van Kooten, G.K., 1988, Structure a
- Page 92: 113°00'112°00'15BV20R i v e rCCNP