12.07.2015 Views

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sevier Plateau was uplifted along <strong>the</strong> Sevier fault zone at least 6000 feet (2000m). Anderson (1987) provided evidence that basin-fill deposits once filled <strong>the</strong>ancestral Sevier Valley to a depth at least 1000 feet (300 m) above <strong>the</strong> modernriver where it cuts through Circleville Canyon, immediately north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> map area,showing that Circleville Canyon was cut by superposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sevier Riveracross <strong>the</strong> resistant Spry intrusion and vent-facies rocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mount DuttonFormation.TvfUpper Tertiary fine-grained basin fill (Miocene) – Light-brown, pinkish-gray,and white tuffaceous mudstone, siltstone, fine-grained sandstone, and localdiatomite; moderately to poorly consolidated; laminated to thick beds, locallywith small gastropods; contains few thin beds <strong>of</strong> peloidal micritic limestone;exposed along Sevier Valley sou<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> Panguitch; likely deposited in smalllake basins and floodplains (Moore and Straub, 1995); exposed thickness about100 feet (30 m).unconformityMarkagunt megabreccia (lower Miocene) – Structurally chaotic assemblage <strong>of</strong>Miocene and Oligocene regional ash-flow tuff, local volcanic rock, and lessersedimentary strata that covers much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central and nor<strong>the</strong>rn Markagunt Plateau;mapping and stratigraphic studies during <strong>the</strong> 1970s to 1990s show how understanding <strong>of</strong>this complex unit has evolved and continues to be controversial, as summarized byMaldonado and o<strong>the</strong>rs (1992), Anderson (1993), Moore and Nealey (1993), Sable andMaldonado (1997a), Hatfield and o<strong>the</strong>rs (2003, 2004), Moore and o<strong>the</strong>rs (2004), andRowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs (in preparation). Sable and Maldonado (1997a) noted that fourseparate rock units have been termed <strong>the</strong> megabreccia, including (1) primary volcanicmudflow deposits, (2) megabreccia that resulted from collapse <strong>of</strong> high-angle fault scarps,(3) megabreccia associated with <strong>the</strong> Red Hills shear zone (Maldonado and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1989,1992; Maldonado, 1995), and (4) <strong>the</strong> principal mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia thatcovers much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central and nor<strong>the</strong>rn Markagunt Plateau; to this we add a fifth unit,namely unconsolidated megabreccia rubble. Sable and Maldonado (1997a) restricted <strong>the</strong>term to unit (4), with which we concur, noting that unit 1 consists <strong>of</strong> primary volcanosedimentarybreccia, likely <strong>the</strong> alluvial facies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 22-32 Ma Mount Dutton Formation;that unit 2 is now known to be a large, modern landslide complex below Black Ledge(Maldonado and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1997; Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs, in preparation); and that unit 3 isgeographically separate from, but may be a dismembered part <strong>of</strong>, <strong>the</strong> main mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Markagunt megabreccia. We interpret <strong>the</strong> unconsolidated rubble breccia (<strong>the</strong> fifth unit),located south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia, to be simply <strong>the</strong>wea<strong>the</strong>ring product <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia – residuum, colluvium, landslide andcollapse material, and alluvium, here collectively mapped as QTbx – that is commonlypresent at a lower structural level along its distal sou<strong>the</strong>rn margin (such rubble is alsopresent on <strong>the</strong> main mass <strong>of</strong> megabreccia, but it is not practical to differentiate such lateTertiary and Quaternary wea<strong>the</strong>ring products where <strong>the</strong>y overlie <strong>the</strong> rubble <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Miocene megabreccia itself). Hatfield and o<strong>the</strong>rs (2003, 2004), Moore and o<strong>the</strong>rs (2004),27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!