Formation or locally by Wah Wah Springs Formation, each as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Markagunt megabreccia; exposures north <strong>of</strong> Bunker Creek (in <strong>the</strong> north-centralpart <strong>of</strong> section 12, T. 36 S., R. 8 W.) show 30 feet (9 m) <strong>of</strong> paleotopography cutinto <strong>the</strong> upper surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Leach Canyon, with blocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rhyolite tuffincorporated into <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overlying mafic block and ash flow; similarmafic block and ash-flow tuff is present north <strong>of</strong> Panguitch Lake, where it isclearly part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia and so mapped as Tm(Tdm) andlumped as Tm in hill 8980 to <strong>the</strong> north; it is unclear if <strong>the</strong> deposits betweenPanguitch Lake and Sidney Peaks partly underlie or are everywhere part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>megabreccia; maximum thickness is about 80 feet (24 m).Tm(Ti) Markagunt megabreccia – Isom Formation component – Medium-gray,crystal-poor, densely welded, trachydacitic ash-flow tuff; small (1-3 mm)euhedral crystals constitute 15 to 20 % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock and are mostly plagioclase(90%) and minor pyroxene, magnetite, and quartz set in a devitrified glassygroundmass; most outcrops and blocks wea<strong>the</strong>r to grussy soils and roundedhills; except at Haycock Mountain, rarely forms cliffs as is typical <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>autochthonous Isom Formation; although generally poorly exposed, constitutes<strong>the</strong> great bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> megabreccia mapped between Panguitch Lake and BrianHead; may locally include areas <strong>of</strong> Brian Head Formation, Wah Wah SpringsFormation, and mafic block and ash-flow tuff that are difficult to delineategiven extensive forest cover and inconspicuous outcrop habit; generallyunconformably overlies <strong>the</strong> Leach Canyon Formation west <strong>of</strong> Panguitch Lake(but also locally overlies Wah Wah Springs Formation and Brian HeadFormation in this area), whereas east <strong>of</strong> Panguitch Lake, unconformablyoverlies what we tentatively map as Limerock Canyon Formation; maximumthickness as much as about 400 feet (120 m).Tm(Tnw) Markagunt megabreccia – Wah Wah Springs Formation component –Pale-red, grayish-orange-pink, and pale-red-purple, crystal-rich, moderatelywelded, dacitic ash-flow tuff; phenocrysts <strong>of</strong> plagioclase, hornblende, biotite,and quartz (with minor Fe-Ti oxides and sanidine) comprise about 40% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rock; forms a single cooling unit; mapped nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> Castle Valley, where itrests on displaced Brian Head strata (Tm[Tbhv]) and in <strong>the</strong> upper reaches <strong>of</strong>Bunker Creek, where it rests on displaced Isom Formation (Tm[Ti]) ordisplaced mafic block and ash-flow tuff (Tm[Tdm]); about 40 feet (12 m) thick.Tm(Tbhv)Markagunt megabreccia – Brian Head Formation component – Poorlyexposed, but distinctive white to light-gray volcaniclastic mudstone, pebblysandstone, micritic limestone, and chalcedony are present as colluvium, thusbetraying <strong>the</strong> formation’s presence nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> Castle Valley where it rests out<strong>of</strong>-sequenceon <strong>the</strong> Leach Canyon Formation; on <strong>the</strong> ridge at <strong>the</strong> commonborder <strong>of</strong> sections 9 and 16, T. 36 S., R. 8 W., pebbly volcaniclastic sandstone<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brian Head Formation, well exposed at <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> a landslide, dips about25° nor<strong>the</strong>ast and is overlain by similarly dipping Wah Wah Springs Formation;on <strong>the</strong> hill to <strong>the</strong> south, however, Brian Head strata appear to be subhorizontal;35
thickness uncertain but outcrop patterns suggest that displaced Brian Head stratalikely exceed 100 feet (30 m) thick.TlTipLimerock Canyon Formation (lower Miocene) – White, light-gray, and pale- toolive-green, locally tuffaceous, volcaniclastic sandstone, pebbly sandstone,gritstone, pebbly conglomerate, mudstone, and minor tuffaceous limestone; maycontain minor multi-hued chalcedony in areas north and west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type sectionnear Hatch, but as described below, we are as yet uncertain in differentiatingBrian Head strata (which contain abundant chalcedony), Bear Valley Formation,and Limerock Canyon Formation; includes at least 10 thin beds <strong>of</strong> ash-fall tuff;commonly bioturbated; clasts are about 90% volcanic but include as much as 10%quartzite and sandstone; Kurlich and Anderson (1997) stated that <strong>the</strong> formationlacks Needles Range, Isom, Bear Valley, and Mount Dutton clasts, but most clastsappear to lead-author Biek to be Isom; mapped on <strong>the</strong> east part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MarkaguntPlateau north and west <strong>of</strong> Hatch, where it appears to cut out much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> BrianHead Formation, although this interpretation is uncertain as described below;unconformably overlain by upper Tertiary unconsolidated fan alluvium (Taf);query indicates uncertain identification; deposited in fluvial and minor lacustrineenvironments; two ash-fall tuff beds, about 100 feet (30 m) and 200 feet (60 m)above <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation at <strong>the</strong> type section west <strong>of</strong> Hatch, respectively,yielded K-Ar ages <strong>of</strong> 21.5 ± 0.6 Ma (biotite) and 21.0 ± 1.0 Ma (sanidine), and20.2 ± 1.4 Ma (biotite) and 19.8 ± 0.8 Ma (sanidine) (Sable and Maldonado,1997b); Sable and Maldonado (1997b) also reported an 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age <strong>of</strong> 20.48 ±0.8 Ma (biotite) and 21.0 ± 1.0 Ma (sanidine); as much as 290 feet (88 m) thick ina composite type section west <strong>of</strong> Hatch (Kurlich, 1990; Kurlich and Anderson,1997).Sable and Maldonado (1997b) described <strong>the</strong> difficulty <strong>of</strong> differentiatingsimilar volcaniclastic strata <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Limerock Canyon, Bear Valley, and BrianHead Formations. The type section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Limerock Canyon Formation (west <strong>of</strong>Hatch) contains a few tens <strong>of</strong> feet <strong>of</strong> strata that we tentatively reassign to <strong>the</strong>Brian Head Formation, and we interpret that <strong>the</strong> limestone that Kurlich andAnderson (1997) assigned to <strong>the</strong> Brian Head Formation at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> this typesection is in fact <strong>the</strong> upper white member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Claron Formation as originallydescribed by Kurlich (1990). Relationships <strong>of</strong> strata that we assign to <strong>the</strong> BrianHead and Limerock Canyon Formations are much clearer in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast corner<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Haycock Mountain quadrangle, 1 to 2 miles (1.5-3 km) west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> typesection. There, and along <strong>the</strong> flanks <strong>of</strong> Hatch Mountain and Haycock Mountain,we place <strong>the</strong> contact between <strong>the</strong> two formations at <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> a massivemultihued chalcedony bed that is typically 3 to 6 feet (1-2 m) thick. Strataunderlying this chalcedony are typical <strong>of</strong> Brian Head strata as <strong>the</strong>y are exposed atBrian Head peak; overlying strata are typically sandier and locally, as on <strong>the</strong> southflank <strong>of</strong> Hatch Mountain, contain significant pebble conglomerate.Iron Peak laccolith (early Miocene) – Medium-gray gabbro-diorite porphyrycomposed almost entirely <strong>of</strong> augite and plagioclase (calcic labradorite) and about8% opaque oxide minerals, mostly magnetite, with diorite <strong>the</strong> dominant phase36
- Page 1 and 2: ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !
- Page 3 and 4: MAP UNIT DESCRIPTIONSQUATERNARYAllu
- Page 5 and 6: Qafc Coalesced fan alluvium of Paro
- Page 7 and 8: glacial deposits and features that
- Page 9 and 10: (Tbhv) and Dakota (Kd and Ktd) Form
- Page 11 and 12: typically mapped where lava flows d
- Page 13 and 14: that range in age from Miocene to H
- Page 15 and 16: fronts (except at Dry Valley, immed
- Page 17 and 18: the quadrangle; no fault that postd
- Page 19 and 20: Qbw, QbwcWater Canyon lava flow and
- Page 21 and 22: others, 2007); lava flow is typical
- Page 23 and 24: Mahogany Hill, about 500 feet (150
- Page 25 and 26: lava flow (Tbbm) that conceal the u
- Page 27 and 28: TERTIARYpreserved in down-dropped b
- Page 29 and 30: and Rowley and others (in preparati
- Page 31 and 32: field (or possibly coeval batholith
- Page 33 and 34: hidden by shadow; we tentatively as
- Page 35: esistant crystal-poor rhyolite tuff
- Page 39 and 40: divide between Red Creek and Little
- Page 41 and 42: pyroxene (5%), and sanidine (trace)
- Page 43 and 44: unconformityThe Leach Canyon Format
- Page 45 and 46: unconformityMa (Best and others, 19
- Page 47 and 48: interval, and a lower limestone int
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 3. View northwest to North V
- Page 51 and 52: dark-yellowish-orange, grayish-pink
- Page 53 and 54: TKgc Grand Castle Formation, undivi
- Page 55 and 56: track (the latter found by Eric Rob
- Page 57 and 58: noted by Moore and Straub (2001) an
- Page 59 and 60: shoreface, beach, lagoonal, and est
- Page 61 and 62: water deposits of Cenomanian age (N
- Page 63 and 64: 62Figure 7. Cedar Mountain Formatio
- Page 65 and 66: leached white under the Cretaceous
- Page 67 and 68: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis geologic map is
- Page 69 and 70: Anderson, R.E., and Christenson, G.
- Page 71 and 72: Biek, R.F., Rowley, P.D., Hayden, J
- Page 73 and 74: field guide (The Mackin Volume): Ut
- Page 75 and 76: 2001, Cretaceous and early Tertiary
- Page 77 and 78: Hacker, D.B., Rowley, P.D., Blank,
- Page 79 and 80: Kurlich, R.A., III, 1990, Geology o
- Page 81 and 82: Maldonado, F., and Moore, R.C., 199
- Page 83 and 84: Flagstaff-Green River basins [abs.]
- Page 85 and 86: elation to other igneous centers in
- Page 87 and 88:
Schulman, E., 1956, Dendroclimatic
- Page 89:
Van Kooten, G.K., 1988, Structure a
- Page 92:
113°00'112°00'15BV20R i v e rCCNP