(Anderson, 1965; Spurney (1984); magnetite veins are present throughout <strong>the</strong>intrusion and are as much as 10 feet (3 m) in width, but most are less than oneinch (2.5 cm) wide (Spurney, 1984); base <strong>of</strong> laccolith is well exposed in <strong>the</strong> northcanyon wall <strong>of</strong> Little Creek, which has incised through <strong>the</strong> laccolith to revealnumerous feeder dikes; originally referred to as <strong>the</strong> Iron Point laccolith byAnderson (1965) and Anderson and Rowley (1975), as <strong>the</strong> namesake peak was<strong>the</strong>n known, but <strong>the</strong> peak was renamed and is now referred to as Iron Peak;intruded at <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic level <strong>of</strong> Brian Head Formation and is preserved in agraben at <strong>the</strong> west edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt Plateau, about 5 miles (8 km) nor<strong>the</strong>ast<strong>of</strong> Paragonah; ro<strong>of</strong> rocks are not preserved; yielded K-Ar whole-rock age <strong>of</strong> 19.7± 0.5 Ma (Fleck and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1975); exposed thickness is as much as about 800 feet(240 m).Forms <strong>the</strong> easternmost laccolith <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Axis, a nor<strong>the</strong>ast-trending belt<strong>of</strong> early Miocene calc-alkaline laccoliths and concordant stocks that rose at about22 to 20 Ma above <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> an inferred large batholith (Blank and Mackin,1967; Cook and Hardman, 1967; Rowley, 1998; Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1998); IronPeak is <strong>the</strong> second youngest and most mafic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Axis intrusions; most <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> central quartz monzonite plutons appear to be partly controlled by nor<strong>the</strong>aststriking,sou<strong>the</strong>ast-verging Sevier-age thrust faults and were emplaced at shallowdepths, mostly within about 1.2 miles (2 km) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface (Mackin and o<strong>the</strong>rs,1976; Van Kooten, 1988; Hacker and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2002, 2007; Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs,2006), but <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith exhibits no such structural control; like <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r laccoliths in <strong>the</strong> belt, <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith probably formed rapidlyfollowing a two-stage emplacement process – injection <strong>of</strong> a sill immediatelyfollowed by inflation – at shallow crustal depth <strong>of</strong> less than 4000 feet (1.2 km)based on stratigraphic reconstructions (Spurney, 1984; see also Hacker and o<strong>the</strong>rs,2002, 2007; Willis, 2002); rapid inflation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> laccoliths commonly led to partialunro<strong>of</strong>ing by gravity sliding, immediately followed by volcanic eruptions(Mackin, 1960; Blank and Mackin, 1967; Hacker and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1996, 2002, 2007;Hacker, 1998; Willis, 2002), although it is unclear if <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccoli<strong>the</strong>xperienced a similar history; Spurney (1984) interpreted exposures immediatelyeast <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith as a peripheral breccia complex and describedvolcanic rocks <strong>of</strong> similar composition to <strong>the</strong> south in <strong>the</strong> adjacent Red CreekReservoir quadrangle that suggest that <strong>the</strong> intrusion erupted and produced lavaflows or block and ash flow breccias; Maldonado and o<strong>the</strong>rs (in preparation),however, interpreted <strong>the</strong> eastern exposures as older Bear Valley breccia; ongoingmapping in <strong>the</strong> Red Creek Reservoir and Cottonwood Mountain quadrangles mayfur<strong>the</strong>r elucidate <strong>the</strong> emplacement history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith.Emplacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith was suggested as one possiblesource <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia (Sable and Maldonado, 1997a), butAnderson (1993, 2001) suggested that <strong>the</strong> intrusion was too small to haveproduced such a large gravity slide; however, because <strong>the</strong> laccolith is onlyexposed in a graben, we do not know its original extent, particularly how far westit may hhave once reached; we mapped megabreccia deposits (here lumped with<strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia for lack <strong>of</strong> suitable criteria for differentiation) on <strong>the</strong>37
divide between Red Creek and Little Creek canyons, and <strong>the</strong>se deposits may be aresult <strong>of</strong> local gravity sliding <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> south flank <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> laccolith.Spurney (1982, 1984) suggested that magnetite veins formed late in <strong>the</strong>laccolith’s emplacement, a result <strong>of</strong> alteration <strong>of</strong> augite phenocrysts; whilemagnetite veins are common, <strong>the</strong>y are apparently <strong>of</strong> insufficient number to havebeen <strong>of</strong> economic importance, unlike <strong>the</strong> nearby Iron Springs mining district west<strong>of</strong> Cedar City, <strong>the</strong> largest iron-producing district in <strong>the</strong> western U.S. (Mackin,1947, 1954, 1960, 1968; Blank and Mackin, 1967; Bullock, 1970; Mackin ando<strong>the</strong>rs, 1976; Mackin and Rowley, 1976; Rowley and Barker, 1978; Barker, 1995;Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2006).TipdFeeder dikes <strong>of</strong> Iron Peak laccolith (lower Miocene) – Mafic dikes exposed in<strong>the</strong> north canyon wall <strong>of</strong> Little Creek, immediately south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peaklaccolith; <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same composition as <strong>the</strong> adjacent laccolith, and so are interpretedto be its feeder dikes (Anderson, 1965; Spurney, 1984; Hacker and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2007);dikes intrude altered Brian Head Formation, which early workers <strong>the</strong>n called <strong>the</strong>upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Claron Formation, and are resistant and so stand as tall fins;most dikes trend nor<strong>the</strong>ast, dip moderately to steeply west, and most are about 6feet (2 m) wide but range from about 0.8 to 25 feet (0.25-8 m) wide.Timd Mafic dikes at <strong>the</strong> west edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt Plateau (lower Miocene) –Highly altered, greenish-gray to brownish-gray, aphanitic to fine-grained maficdikes that trend both north-northwest and nor<strong>the</strong>ast in <strong>the</strong> Cottonwood Mountainquadrangle; some dikes contain small plagioclase phenocrysts; typically deeplywea<strong>the</strong>red and so poorly exposed, but most dikes fill joints and smalldisplacementfaults, which are especially well developed in a horst <strong>of</strong> gentlynorthwest-tilted Claron strata at <strong>the</strong> west edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plateau, west <strong>of</strong> Iron Peak;Maldonado and o<strong>the</strong>rs (1997a; in preparation) suggested that <strong>the</strong> dikes may berelated to an older phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak intrusion or to dikes <strong>of</strong> Mount Dutton; asample from one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> northwest-trending dikes west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolithyielded a K-Ar age <strong>of</strong> about 20 Ma (H.H. Mehnert and R.E. Anderson, writtencommunication to F. Maldonado, 1988); dikes range from about 1 to 20 feet (0.3-6 m) wide.Td Mount Dutton Formation, alluvial facies (lower Miocene to Oligocene) –Light- to dark-gray and brown, andesitic to dacitic volcanic mudflow breccia andlesser interbedded volcaniclastic conglomerate and tuffaceous sandstone; alsocontains subordinate lava flows, flow breccia, and minor felsic tuff; Anderson andRowley (1975) defined <strong>the</strong> Mount Dutton Formation as consisting <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rocks exposed on <strong>the</strong> south flank <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Marysvale volcanic pile, and divided itinto complexly interfingering and cross-cutting vent and alluvial facies derivedfrom clustered stratovolcanoes and dikes that form most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rnMarysvale volcanic field; most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation consists <strong>of</strong> intermediatecompositionvolcanic rocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alluvial facies, with comparatively thin,intercalated formally named members; on <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Markagunt Plateau, <strong>the</strong>formation overlies <strong>the</strong> Bear Valley Formation; makes up <strong>the</strong> youngest (in <strong>the</strong>38
- Page 1 and 2: ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !
- Page 3 and 4: MAP UNIT DESCRIPTIONSQUATERNARYAllu
- Page 5 and 6: Qafc Coalesced fan alluvium of Paro
- Page 7 and 8: glacial deposits and features that
- Page 9 and 10: (Tbhv) and Dakota (Kd and Ktd) Form
- Page 11 and 12: typically mapped where lava flows d
- Page 13 and 14: that range in age from Miocene to H
- Page 15 and 16: fronts (except at Dry Valley, immed
- Page 17 and 18: the quadrangle; no fault that postd
- Page 19 and 20: Qbw, QbwcWater Canyon lava flow and
- Page 21 and 22: others, 2007); lava flow is typical
- Page 23 and 24: Mahogany Hill, about 500 feet (150
- Page 25 and 26: lava flow (Tbbm) that conceal the u
- Page 27 and 28: TERTIARYpreserved in down-dropped b
- Page 29 and 30: and Rowley and others (in preparati
- Page 31 and 32: field (or possibly coeval batholith
- Page 33 and 34: hidden by shadow; we tentatively as
- Page 35 and 36: esistant crystal-poor rhyolite tuff
- Page 37: thickness uncertain but outcrop pat
- Page 41 and 42: pyroxene (5%), and sanidine (trace)
- Page 43 and 44: unconformityThe Leach Canyon Format
- Page 45 and 46: unconformityMa (Best and others, 19
- Page 47 and 48: interval, and a lower limestone int
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 3. View northwest to North V
- Page 51 and 52: dark-yellowish-orange, grayish-pink
- Page 53 and 54: TKgc Grand Castle Formation, undivi
- Page 55 and 56: track (the latter found by Eric Rob
- Page 57 and 58: noted by Moore and Straub (2001) an
- Page 59 and 60: shoreface, beach, lagoonal, and est
- Page 61 and 62: water deposits of Cenomanian age (N
- Page 63 and 64: 62Figure 7. Cedar Mountain Formatio
- Page 65 and 66: leached white under the Cretaceous
- Page 67 and 68: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis geologic map is
- Page 69 and 70: Anderson, R.E., and Christenson, G.
- Page 71 and 72: Biek, R.F., Rowley, P.D., Hayden, J
- Page 73 and 74: field guide (The Mackin Volume): Ut
- Page 75 and 76: 2001, Cretaceous and early Tertiary
- Page 77 and 78: Hacker, D.B., Rowley, P.D., Blank,
- Page 79 and 80: Kurlich, R.A., III, 1990, Geology o
- Page 81 and 82: Maldonado, F., and Moore, R.C., 199
- Page 83 and 84: Flagstaff-Green River basins [abs.]
- Page 85 and 86: elation to other igneous centers in
- Page 87 and 88: Schulman, E., 1956, Dendroclimatic
- Page 89:
Van Kooten, G.K., 1988, Structure a
- Page 92:
113°00'112°00'15BV20R i v e rCCNP