12.07.2015 Views

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

Interim Geologic Map of the West Part of - Utah Geological Survey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Anderson, 1965; Spurney (1984); magnetite veins are present throughout <strong>the</strong>intrusion and are as much as 10 feet (3 m) in width, but most are less than oneinch (2.5 cm) wide (Spurney, 1984); base <strong>of</strong> laccolith is well exposed in <strong>the</strong> northcanyon wall <strong>of</strong> Little Creek, which has incised through <strong>the</strong> laccolith to revealnumerous feeder dikes; originally referred to as <strong>the</strong> Iron Point laccolith byAnderson (1965) and Anderson and Rowley (1975), as <strong>the</strong> namesake peak was<strong>the</strong>n known, but <strong>the</strong> peak was renamed and is now referred to as Iron Peak;intruded at <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic level <strong>of</strong> Brian Head Formation and is preserved in agraben at <strong>the</strong> west edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt Plateau, about 5 miles (8 km) nor<strong>the</strong>ast<strong>of</strong> Paragonah; ro<strong>of</strong> rocks are not preserved; yielded K-Ar whole-rock age <strong>of</strong> 19.7± 0.5 Ma (Fleck and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1975); exposed thickness is as much as about 800 feet(240 m).Forms <strong>the</strong> easternmost laccolith <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Axis, a nor<strong>the</strong>ast-trending belt<strong>of</strong> early Miocene calc-alkaline laccoliths and concordant stocks that rose at about22 to 20 Ma above <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> an inferred large batholith (Blank and Mackin,1967; Cook and Hardman, 1967; Rowley, 1998; Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1998); IronPeak is <strong>the</strong> second youngest and most mafic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Axis intrusions; most <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> central quartz monzonite plutons appear to be partly controlled by nor<strong>the</strong>aststriking,sou<strong>the</strong>ast-verging Sevier-age thrust faults and were emplaced at shallowdepths, mostly within about 1.2 miles (2 km) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface (Mackin and o<strong>the</strong>rs,1976; Van Kooten, 1988; Hacker and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 2002, 2007; Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs,2006), but <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith exhibits no such structural control; like <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r laccoliths in <strong>the</strong> belt, <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith probably formed rapidlyfollowing a two-stage emplacement process – injection <strong>of</strong> a sill immediatelyfollowed by inflation – at shallow crustal depth <strong>of</strong> less than 4000 feet (1.2 km)based on stratigraphic reconstructions (Spurney, 1984; see also Hacker and o<strong>the</strong>rs,2002, 2007; Willis, 2002); rapid inflation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> laccoliths commonly led to partialunro<strong>of</strong>ing by gravity sliding, immediately followed by volcanic eruptions(Mackin, 1960; Blank and Mackin, 1967; Hacker and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1996, 2002, 2007;Hacker, 1998; Willis, 2002), although it is unclear if <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccoli<strong>the</strong>xperienced a similar history; Spurney (1984) interpreted exposures immediatelyeast <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith as a peripheral breccia complex and describedvolcanic rocks <strong>of</strong> similar composition to <strong>the</strong> south in <strong>the</strong> adjacent Red CreekReservoir quadrangle that suggest that <strong>the</strong> intrusion erupted and produced lavaflows or block and ash flow breccias; Maldonado and o<strong>the</strong>rs (in preparation),however, interpreted <strong>the</strong> eastern exposures as older Bear Valley breccia; ongoingmapping in <strong>the</strong> Red Creek Reservoir and Cottonwood Mountain quadrangles mayfur<strong>the</strong>r elucidate <strong>the</strong> emplacement history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith.Emplacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iron Peak laccolith was suggested as one possiblesource <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia (Sable and Maldonado, 1997a), butAnderson (1993, 2001) suggested that <strong>the</strong> intrusion was too small to haveproduced such a large gravity slide; however, because <strong>the</strong> laccolith is onlyexposed in a graben, we do not know its original extent, particularly how far westit may hhave once reached; we mapped megabreccia deposits (here lumped with<strong>the</strong> Markagunt megabreccia for lack <strong>of</strong> suitable criteria for differentiation) on <strong>the</strong>37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!