Fryman (1986, 1987) also described fumaroles in <strong>the</strong> Isom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rnMarkagunt Plateau, a result <strong>of</strong> degassing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flow as it came to a rest.The source is unknown, but isopach maps and pumice distribution suggestthat <strong>the</strong> Isom Formation was derived from late-stage eruptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 27-32 MaIndian Peak caldera complex that straddles <strong>the</strong> <strong>Utah</strong>-Nevada border, possibly inan area now concealed by <strong>the</strong> western Escalante Desert (Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1979;Best and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1989a, 1989b); estimated crystallization temperature andpressure <strong>of</strong> phenocrysts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Isom is 950°C and < 2 kbar (Best and o<strong>the</strong>rs,1993), and this relatively high temperature is supported by its degree <strong>of</strong> weldingand secondary flow features; at its type area in <strong>the</strong> Iron Springs district southwest<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> map area, Mackin (1960) defined three members, a lower unnamedmember, <strong>the</strong> Baldhills Tuff Member, and <strong>the</strong> upper Hole-in-<strong>the</strong>-Wall TuffMember; Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs (1975) redefined <strong>the</strong> Baldhills Tuff Member toinclude Mackin’s lower unnamed member, and noted that <strong>the</strong> Baldhills consists <strong>of</strong>at least six cooling units; Maldonado and Williams (1993a, b) described nineapparent cooling units in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Red Hills at <strong>the</strong> west edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> map area;in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Markagunt Plateau, Anderson and Rowley (1975) defined <strong>the</strong> BlueMeadows Tuff Member, which underlies <strong>the</strong> Baldhills Tuff Member, but it ispossible that <strong>the</strong> Blue Meadows Tuff is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mount Dutton Formation, andthus a local tuff <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Marysvale volcanic field (Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1994a); insome places in <strong>the</strong> Panguitch 30’ x 60’ quadrangle, autochthonous IsomFormation may include <strong>the</strong> Baldhills Tuff Member, but this member was notrecognized in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> its outcrop belt in <strong>the</strong> map area; <strong>the</strong> IsomFormation is about 26 to 27 Ma on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> many 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and K-Ar ages(Best and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1989b; Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1994 a); maximum exposedthickness is about 350 feet (110 m) at Black Ledge and about 250 feet (75 m)along Ipson Creek.<strong>Map</strong>ped as <strong>the</strong> Blue Meadows Tuff Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Isom Formation at <strong>the</strong>east edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cottonwood Mountain quadrangle (Maldonado and o<strong>the</strong>rs, inpreparation), but refered to simply as Isom Formation undivided here pendingongoing mapping in areas to <strong>the</strong> east.TnTnlNeedles Range Group, undivided (lower Oligocene) – Lund Formation andWah Wah Springs Formation undivided in <strong>the</strong> Red Hills due to map scale.Lund Formation (lower Oligocene) – Grayish-orange-pink, moderately welded,crystal-rich, dacitic ash-flow tuff exposed in <strong>the</strong> Red Hills; similar to underlyingWah Wah Springs Formation, but with generally smaller mafic phenocrysts and alighter-colored matrix; locally contains spheroidal masses <strong>of</strong> tuff as large as 1 foot(0.3 m) in diameter near <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit; base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation includes about12 feet (4 m) <strong>of</strong> pale-greenish-yellow tuffaceous sandstone and lesser pebblyvolcaniclastic conglomerate; exhibits normal magnetic polarity (Best and Grant,1987); derived from <strong>the</strong> White Rock caldera, <strong>the</strong> southwest part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> olderIndian Peak caldera, and is <strong>of</strong> similar volume to <strong>the</strong> underlying Wah Wah SpringsFormation (Best and Grant, 1987; Best and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1989a, b); preferred age is 27.943
unconformityMa (Best and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1989a); as much as about 200 feet (60 m) thick; unitdescription modified from Maldonado and Williams (1993a).TnwWah Wah Springs Formation (lower Oligocene) – Pale-red to grayish-orangepink,moderately welded, crystal-rich, dacitic ash-flow tuff that rests on BrianHead strata and is overlain by <strong>the</strong> Isom Formation; phenocrysts <strong>of</strong> plagioclase,hornblende, biotite, and quartz (plus minor Fe-Ti oxides and sanidine) constituteabout 40% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock; elongate collapsed pumice is common; exposed west <strong>of</strong>Cottonwood Mountain and west <strong>of</strong> Bear Valley in <strong>the</strong> Cottonwood Mountainquadrangle, at <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> Bunker Creek in <strong>the</strong> Brian Head quadrangle, and in <strong>the</strong>Red Hills; exhibits reversed magnetic polarity (Best and Grant, 1987); derivedfrom <strong>the</strong> 27-32 Ma Indian Peak caldera complex that straddles <strong>the</strong> <strong>Utah</strong>-Nevadaborder (Best and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1989a, 1989b); today, Wah Wah Springs covers at least8500 square miles (22,000 km 2 ) with an estimated volume as much as about 720cubic miles (3000 km 3 ) (Best and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1989a); about 30 Ma based on many K-Ar and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age determinations (Best and Grant, 1987; Best and o<strong>the</strong>rs,1989a, b; Rowley and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1994a); about 40 feet (12 m) thick near <strong>the</strong> westedge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Markagunt Plateau, but as much as 400 feet (120 m) thick in <strong>the</strong> RedHills (Maldonado and Williams, 1993a, b).A small exposure on Lowder Creek (east <strong>of</strong> Brian Head peak) is deeplywea<strong>the</strong>red, nonresistant, white, crystal-rich ash-flow tuff about 6 feet (2 m) thick;phenocrysts <strong>of</strong> plagioclase, hornblende, biotite, and quartz (plus minor Fe-Tioxides and sanidine) make up about 30 to 40% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock; color and degree <strong>of</strong>welding contrast sharply with typical Wah Wah Springs, leading Rowley ando<strong>the</strong>rs (in preparation) to suggest that <strong>the</strong> tuff at Lowder Creek was deposited in alake; <strong>the</strong> Lowder Creek exposure is overlain by 3 to 6 feet (1-2 m) <strong>of</strong> volcanicmudflow breccia, which is in turn overlain by 10 to 15 feet (3-5 m) <strong>of</strong> deeplywea<strong>the</strong>red, nonresistant, crystal-poor ash-flow tuff(?) <strong>of</strong> uncertain provenance,which is itself overlain by autochthonous Isom Formation.unconformityBrian Head Formation (lower Oligocene to uppermost Eocene) – The Brian HeadFormation is <strong>the</strong> oldest widespread Tertiary volcaniclastic unit in <strong>the</strong> region; itdisconformably overlies <strong>the</strong> uppermost mudstone, siltstone, and sandstone interval(Tcwt) and <strong>the</strong> upper white limestone interval (Tcwu) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> white member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ClaronFormation on <strong>the</strong> Markagunt Plateau (in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Markagunt Plateau and Red Hills,where <strong>the</strong> white member appears to be missing, Brian Head strata overlie <strong>the</strong> red member<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Claron Formation). Sable and Maldonado (1997b) divided <strong>the</strong> Brian HeadFormation into three informal units, ascending: (1) nontuffaceous sandstone andconglomerate, (2) a volcaniclastic unit that has minor but conspicuous limestone andchalcedony, and (3) a volcanic unit, locally present, characterized by volcanic mudflowbreccia, mafic lava flows, volcaniclastic sandstone and conglomerate, and ash-flow tuff;we include <strong>the</strong> basal nontuffaceous sandstone and conglomerate as a new uppermost part44
- Page 1 and 2: ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !
- Page 3 and 4: MAP UNIT DESCRIPTIONSQUATERNARYAllu
- Page 5 and 6: Qafc Coalesced fan alluvium of Paro
- Page 7 and 8: glacial deposits and features that
- Page 9 and 10: (Tbhv) and Dakota (Kd and Ktd) Form
- Page 11 and 12: typically mapped where lava flows d
- Page 13 and 14: that range in age from Miocene to H
- Page 15 and 16: fronts (except at Dry Valley, immed
- Page 17 and 18: the quadrangle; no fault that postd
- Page 19 and 20: Qbw, QbwcWater Canyon lava flow and
- Page 21 and 22: others, 2007); lava flow is typical
- Page 23 and 24: Mahogany Hill, about 500 feet (150
- Page 25 and 26: lava flow (Tbbm) that conceal the u
- Page 27 and 28: TERTIARYpreserved in down-dropped b
- Page 29 and 30: and Rowley and others (in preparati
- Page 31 and 32: field (or possibly coeval batholith
- Page 33 and 34: hidden by shadow; we tentatively as
- Page 35 and 36: esistant crystal-poor rhyolite tuff
- Page 37 and 38: thickness uncertain but outcrop pat
- Page 39 and 40: divide between Red Creek and Little
- Page 41 and 42: pyroxene (5%), and sanidine (trace)
- Page 43: unconformityThe Leach Canyon Format
- Page 47 and 48: interval, and a lower limestone int
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 3. View northwest to North V
- Page 51 and 52: dark-yellowish-orange, grayish-pink
- Page 53 and 54: TKgc Grand Castle Formation, undivi
- Page 55 and 56: track (the latter found by Eric Rob
- Page 57 and 58: noted by Moore and Straub (2001) an
- Page 59 and 60: shoreface, beach, lagoonal, and est
- Page 61 and 62: water deposits of Cenomanian age (N
- Page 63 and 64: 62Figure 7. Cedar Mountain Formatio
- Page 65 and 66: leached white under the Cretaceous
- Page 67 and 68: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis geologic map is
- Page 69 and 70: Anderson, R.E., and Christenson, G.
- Page 71 and 72: Biek, R.F., Rowley, P.D., Hayden, J
- Page 73 and 74: field guide (The Mackin Volume): Ut
- Page 75 and 76: 2001, Cretaceous and early Tertiary
- Page 77 and 78: Hacker, D.B., Rowley, P.D., Blank,
- Page 79 and 80: Kurlich, R.A., III, 1990, Geology o
- Page 81 and 82: Maldonado, F., and Moore, R.C., 199
- Page 83 and 84: Flagstaff-Green River basins [abs.]
- Page 85 and 86: elation to other igneous centers in
- Page 87 and 88: Schulman, E., 1956, Dendroclimatic
- Page 89: Van Kooten, G.K., 1988, Structure a
- Page 92: 113°00'112°00'15BV20R i v e rCCNP