12.07.2015 Views

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 6FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONSremains adequate to ensure consistency with <strong>the</strong> Bank’soverall trust fund policy <strong>of</strong> only accepting trust funds(including FIFs) that promote development and aideffectiveness.6.15 Management, accountability, and risks. All trust fundsreviewed by <strong>the</strong> evaluation are broadly consistent with <strong>the</strong> Bank’smandate, but not always well aligned with Bank or client countrypriorities. Its trust fund management framework and policy focusesmore on processes than on <strong>the</strong> strategic issues surrounding <strong>the</strong> Bank’scontinuing uptake <strong>of</strong> responsibility in administering donor trustfunds.6.16 The Bank’s accountabilities for <strong>the</strong> trust funds it managesare—with some exceptions—weaker than for IBRD/IDA and Bankbudget-financed activities. The accountability gaps arise because <strong>the</strong>Bank and donors have agreed to parallel allocation, approval, andbusiness processes. Despite ongoing efforts at mainstreaming trustfunds in Bank operational processes, many processes are attached to<strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> funds ra<strong>the</strong>r than to <strong>the</strong> development activity beingfinanced. This has generated inefficiency and weak accounting forresults. If Bank-managed trust funds are to be used efficiently and inan accountable way, <strong>the</strong>y need to follow <strong>the</strong> same policies, processes,and procedures that guide <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bank’s core resources.6.17 There are both potential missed opportunities and risks to <strong>the</strong>Bank and its clients from <strong>the</strong> Bank continuing to accumulate trustfund resources and responsibilities without a clear strategy and moreeffective oversight and accountability. Clients face potentialdevelopment risks and <strong>the</strong> Bank faces potential reputational risksfrom <strong>the</strong> Bank accepting trusteeship <strong>of</strong> individual trust funds thatprove not to work well, and more generally, from taking onobligations that operate outside <strong>of</strong> Bank operational policies (as in <strong>the</strong>case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FIFs) or are inconsistent with Bank commitments to aideffectiveness principles as set out in <strong>the</strong> Paris Declaration. Moreover,<strong>the</strong> unpredictability <strong>of</strong> multi-year donor contributions to establishedtrust funds and, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>of</strong> trust fund financing to recipients posesrisks to sustainability <strong>of</strong> support and program planning, both forclients and <strong>the</strong> Bank.Recommendations6.18 This evaluation concludes that because trust funds addresslimitations in bilateral aid and <strong>the</strong> existing multilateral system andhave enabled <strong>the</strong> Bank to enhance its role in pursuit <strong>of</strong> itsdevelopment agenda <strong>the</strong> Bank should continue to accept <strong>the</strong>m. But83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!