An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio
An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio
An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 1THE ROLE OF TRUST FUNDS IN THE GLOBAL AID ARCHITECTURE<strong>the</strong> mandate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bank? What have <strong>the</strong>y contributed tocountries’ development efforts, and how consistent is <strong>the</strong>ir usewith principles <strong>of</strong> aid effectiveness?How effective are <strong>the</strong> processes within <strong>the</strong> Bank for <strong>the</strong>management and accountability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trust funds itadministers?What impact —in terms <strong>of</strong> benefits and costs— have trustfunds had on <strong>the</strong> overall business <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank?1.8 This assessment is based on <strong>the</strong> findings from six evaluationexercises: 7 Eight country studies, which included interviews with some120 government <strong>of</strong>ficials and in-country donorrepresentatives, in addition to many Bank staff 8 Review <strong>of</strong> a stratified random sample <strong>of</strong> 36 trust-fundedprograms, including programs <strong>of</strong> varying size Structured interviews with 40 randomly selected sectormanagers in <strong>the</strong> Bank’s Regions and networks Structured interviews with 55 <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> 8 donors 9 Review <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r relevant Independent <strong>Evaluation</strong> Group (IEG)evaluations, Quality Assurance Group (QAG) reviews, ando<strong>the</strong>r external independent evaluations <strong>of</strong> specific trustfundedglobal and regional partnership programs Interviews with a large number <strong>of</strong> Bank managers and staffresponsible for <strong>the</strong> management and coordination <strong>of</strong> trustfunds.A majorconstraint toevaluating <strong>the</strong>Bank’sengagementwith trust fundsis <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong>comprehensiveand consistentdata.1.9 A major constraint in <strong>the</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> this evaluation is <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong>comprehensive and consistent data on <strong>the</strong> Bank’s trust fund portfolioand <strong>the</strong> uses <strong>of</strong> trust fund contributions. While improvements weremade in <strong>the</strong> Bank’s internal trust fund data over <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> thisevaluation, weaknesses still exist. This is a matter discussed in chapter4, as part <strong>of</strong> this evaluation’s assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bank’s overallperformance in <strong>the</strong> accountability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> trust funds. The rest <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> current chapter addresses <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> why trust funds areused and what issues are raised by <strong>the</strong>ir increasing use over <strong>the</strong>period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> review.DONOR, RECIPIENT, AND BANK MOTIVES AND INTERESTS1.10 While donors, recipients, and trustee institutions have someoverlapping interests in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> trust funds, <strong>the</strong>ir interests diverge notably onmatters <strong>of</strong> how trust fund allocation decisions are made and how <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir resources are governed and managed.4