12.07.2015 Views

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 3THE RELEVANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF TRUST FUND SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENTBox 3.10 Recipients’ Balance Sheet on <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>sRecipient <strong>of</strong>ficials say <strong>the</strong>y have derived benefits from <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> trust funds whentrust funds:• Provided coordinated grant financing• Supplied funds when <strong>the</strong>y can’t borrow from <strong>the</strong> MDBs or when bilateraldonors are reluctant to “go it alone”• Reduced transaction costs and piecemeal funding by pooling bilateral aid• Were accompanied by <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank’s convening power and technicalexpertise• Were a more flexible resource to tap for just-in-time assistance than Bankproject or program funding.Recipients also state that trust funds—especially global funds that operate inmultiple countries—have tended to create obstacles to <strong>the</strong>ir own program planningand implementation that <strong>the</strong>y do not typically encounter with aid provided through<strong>the</strong> Bank. They have found trust funds to be particularly obstructive when <strong>the</strong>y:• Require redundant plans and reports• Impose eligibility criteria—such as outcome targets or implementationmodalities—ill-suited to country conditions• Provide funds unpredictably—in some cases obliging recipients to front-loadimplementation or scale back plans• Do not coordinate fund activities well with related operations• Entail implementation arrangements determined by <strong>the</strong> trust fund, notcountry systems• Are not transparent.On balance, recipients consider trust funds as second best to direct budget or sectorprogram support and preferable to small and piecemeal project support. <strong>An</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ysee <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> trust funds as needing to be more consistent with aid effectivenesspractices <strong>of</strong> country ownership and country-led aid coordination.Source: Interviews with recipient <strong>of</strong>ficials conducted for this evaluation.Recipient Views <strong>of</strong> Their Experiences with <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>s3.58 From <strong>the</strong> perspective <strong>of</strong> recipients, <strong>the</strong> shortfalls in <strong>the</strong> goodaid practice <strong>of</strong> trust funds limit <strong>the</strong> overall value added <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fundsas vehicles for <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> aid. The benefits and costs as seen byrecipients are summarized in box 3.10.Summary3.59 While <strong>the</strong>re is no clear evidence that trust funds havemobilized additional resources at <strong>the</strong> global level, <strong>the</strong>y add value as adistinct aid vehicle by providing coordinated financing and grantresources for particular countries and targeted issues. The valueadded <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se gap-filling functions is especially evident in trust fund47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!