12.07.2015 Views

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUMMARYfunds). Units draw on trust funds for a wide range<strong>of</strong> Bank-executed activities, especially nonlendingtechnical assistance and incremental economic andsector work. They also pay for coordination andpartnership work, and sometimes provideoperational support for <strong>the</strong> preparation andsupervision <strong>of</strong> projects. Overall <strong>the</strong>y account for32 percent <strong>of</strong> expenditures on <strong>the</strong> Bank’s coreknowledge products, with three-quarters <strong>of</strong> thattotal used for Bank analytical and advisoryservices.THE BANK’S MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK ANDPOLICY. The Bank’s 2007 trust fund frameworkand policy focus primarily on financial andoperational control processes, and are beingimplemented. But nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> framework nor <strong>the</strong>policy has been used to elucidate strategic issues in<strong>the</strong> Bank’s continuing uptake <strong>of</strong> responsibility inadministering donor trust funds and <strong>the</strong>ir impacton Bank business. There are four such issues: (1)when and why trust funds should be used inadvancing <strong>the</strong> Bank’s mandate; (2) what features<strong>of</strong> trust fund design and management foster <strong>the</strong>iraid effectiveness; (3) <strong>the</strong> assignment andsegregation at <strong>the</strong> corporate level <strong>of</strong> three separatefunctions: mobilizing trust fund resources,managing trust-funded programs, and managing<strong>the</strong> risks <strong>of</strong> Bank trust fund administration; and(4) how to account for <strong>the</strong> uses and results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>FIFs and <strong>the</strong> Bank-managed trust funds.ACCOUNTABILITY AND RISKS. Managerialaccountability is a way to ensure that resources areused to deliver results. The Bank’s accountabilitiesfor <strong>the</strong> trust funds it manages are—with someexceptions—weaker than for IBRD/IDA andBank budget-financed activities. Theseaccountability weaknesses arise because <strong>the</strong> Bankand donors have agreed to parallel allocation,approval, and business processes (for example, forquality assurance, supervision, and resultsreporting). Despite ongoing efforts atmainstreaming trust funds in Bank operationalprocesses, many processes are attached to <strong>the</strong>source <strong>of</strong> funds ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> developmentactivity being financed. For example, some trustfund resources are allocated to Bank projects andstudies using a lengthy and unpredictable processthat is not synchronized with annual planning andbudgeting exercises. This has generatedinefficiency and weak accounting for results. IfBank-managed trust funds are to be used efficientlyand in an accountable way, <strong>the</strong>y need to follow <strong>the</strong>same policies, processes, and procedures that guide<strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bank’s core resources.There are potential missed opportunities and risksto <strong>the</strong> Bank and its clients from <strong>the</strong> Bankcontinuing to accumulate trust fund resources andresponsibilities without a strategic approach andmore effective accountability. Clients facepotential development risks and <strong>the</strong> Bank facespotential reputational risks from <strong>the</strong> Bankaccepting trusteeship <strong>of</strong> individual trust funds thatlater fail to generate results and from taking onobligations that operate outside Bank operationalpolicies (as in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FIFs) or operateinconsistently with Bank commitments to aideffectiveness principles as set out in <strong>the</strong> ParisDeclaration. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> unpredictability <strong>of</strong>multiyear donor contributions to established trustfunds and, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>of</strong> trust fund financing torecipients poses risks to program planning, bothfor clients and <strong>the</strong> Bank.RecommendationsThis evaluation concludes that because trust fundsaddress limitations in bilateral aid and <strong>the</strong> existingmultilateral system and have enabled <strong>the</strong> Bank toenhance its development role, <strong>the</strong> Bank shouldcontinue to accept <strong>the</strong>m. But changes are needed t<strong>of</strong>oster more effective, efficient, and accountable use<strong>of</strong> trust funds. This evaluation recommends that<strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank adopt a more structured anddisciplined approach to <strong>the</strong> mobilization anddeployment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se funds, based on <strong>the</strong> followingthree specific recommendations:1. FOR TRUST FUNDS OTHER THAN FIFS. To better aligntrust funds with recipient, donor, and Bank strategicpriorities and improve <strong>the</strong>ir effectiveness, efficiency,and accountability for results, IEG recommendsthat <strong>the</strong> Bank adopt a three-pillar structure for trustfunds, consisting <strong>of</strong> country-specific trust funds,global and regional partnership programs, andumbrella facilities.Country-specific trust funds: The Bankshould continue to accept trust funds createdto support operations in a single country,because <strong>the</strong>se funds have generally workedwell in filling financing gaps and deployingxi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!