12.07.2015 Views

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 3THE RELEVANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF TRUST FUND SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENTThe distinctivefeatures <strong>of</strong>single-recipientcountryandmultiplerecipientcountrytrustfunds, and <strong>of</strong>single-donorand multidonorfunds, influencehow effectivelytrust fundsdeploy <strong>the</strong>irresources.questions it raises about an effective division <strong>of</strong> labor andcoherence within <strong>the</strong> overall aid system in health. 12Lack <strong>of</strong> predictable aid flows. Global funds—for instanceEFA/FTI and <strong>the</strong> Global <strong>Fund</strong>—were set up with <strong>the</strong> statedintention to provide more predictable aid flows to countryprograms. Yet, evaluations <strong>of</strong> both vertical funds indicateshortfalls in <strong>the</strong> predictability <strong>of</strong> year-by-year financing torecipients, which impedes planning for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ownresources and those <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r partners.Inefficiencies in relationships among donors. Asgovernments, donors, and Bank staff frequently said ininterviews, “trust fund coordination is time-consuming” and“too much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time is spent on processes related to pooledfunding, crowding out time for supervision and programadjustment in response to problems <strong>of</strong> implementation.” Onesource <strong>of</strong> inefficiency is <strong>the</strong> frequent need to seekauthorization for actions by Bank country staff from Bankheadquarters and in-country donor representatives from <strong>the</strong>ircapitals, adding time and complexity to trust fundnegotiations and design. Also, conflicts andmisunderstandings, most notably around procurement and<strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> country systems, have strained relations between<strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank and trust fund donors in some countries. Inboth Benin and Rwanda this tension led to a shift away from<strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank in <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> specific trust funds(focused on public financial management). It is also oneunderlying reason for broad change in <strong>the</strong> supervision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>EFA/FTI trust fund, from a model where <strong>the</strong> Bank is <strong>the</strong>primary supervisory agency to one where that role isdetermined at <strong>the</strong> country level, with agreement amonggovernments, donors, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank. Donor reforms toreduce earmarking, increase funding predictability, andaligning trust fund cycles with <strong>the</strong> Bank’s business cycle and<strong>the</strong> streamlining <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bank’s overall procurement regime(discussed in chapter 4) could help ease <strong>the</strong> inefficiencies.THE IMPACT OF KEY STRUCTURAL FEATURES3.52 Both donor and recipient features <strong>of</strong> trust funds impact howwell trust funds deploy <strong>the</strong>ir resources. That is, it matters to howeffectively and efficiently trust funds have performed whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>yhave been focused on single or multiple recipient countries and hadsingle or multiple donors, as illustrated in table 3.1.44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!