12.07.2015 Views

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT EXTERNAL ADAPTATION ISSUES 103sions <strong>and</strong> were therefore complacent about pushing for even higherperformance levels. Senior management chose to compare thesesame divisions to their external competitors in the same product/market space <strong>and</strong> found that they were underperforming by this criterion.For example, the pharmaceutical division outperformed theother chemical divisions but did poorly relative to other pharmaceuticalcompanies. But the tradition of being one family madeit hard to convince the pharma division managers to accept thetougher external st<strong>and</strong>ards.Many so-called culture change programs actually deal only withthis one element of the culture—the measurements to be applied tofuture performance. Thus, new chief executives come in <strong>and</strong> announcethat they will emphasize product quality, or bring costs undercontrol, or get the organization to be more customer oriented. Thissometimes sounds like a real change in mission but on closer examinationturns out to be merely a new focus on how to measure success.From this perspective it is clear that such new signals willchange only one element of the culture. If only the results signals arechanged, without concern for mission, goals, <strong>and</strong> means, very littleactual change may come about.Consensus on Means of MeasurementConsensus must be achieved both on the criteria <strong>and</strong> on the meansby which information is to be gathered. For example, at DEC duringits early years there developed a very open communication system,built around high levels of acquaintance <strong>and</strong> trust among themembers of the organization. This system was supported by a computerizedelectronic mail network, constant telephone communications,frequent visits, formal <strong>and</strong> informal surveys <strong>and</strong> sensingmeetings, <strong>and</strong> two- to three-day committee meetings in settingsaway from the office. Individual managers developed their own systemsof measurement <strong>and</strong> were trusted to report progress accurately.DEC operated on the powerful shared assumption that information<strong>and</strong> truth were the lifeblood of the organization, <strong>and</strong> the company

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!