12.07.2015 Views

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196 <strong>ORGANIZATIONAL</strong> <strong>CULTURE</strong> AND LEADERSHIPclan is a high-sociability, high-solidarity networked culture? No,because a clan is inwardly focused, whereas a networked culture is,by implication, externally focused. And the communal <strong>and</strong> fragmentedcultures clearly do not map onto hierarchy or adhocracy. Sowe are left with a dilemma that, in my view, derives from trying tobuild simple typologies in the first place. In order to determinewhich typology works better, we would have to assess a given organizationwith a much more open-ended, multidimensional approachof the sort I will describe in the next chapter.Intraorganizational TypologiesThe most obvious of intraorganizational typologies is the traditionaldistinction between management <strong>and</strong> labor or salaried <strong>and</strong> hourly.In every organization one can distinguish some version of this typology—thosewho run the place <strong>and</strong> those who do the daily work.There is no doubt that where these groups are more or less stable <strong>and</strong>develop a history of their own, they will become cultural units. Thebest example is the use of the concept of “comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> control” asa type of organization.Historically, an important element of such culture formationhas been opposition—the deep assumption in both cultures thatthe conflict between them is intrinsic <strong>and</strong> inevitable. In a laborunion a strong tradition may arise <strong>and</strong> get passed on from generationto generation that “management will always exploit you <strong>and</strong>screw you if it can,” <strong>and</strong> within management the assumption maybe passed on that “labor will always do as little as possible”—whatMcGregor identified as Theory X. This tendency leads to characterizingwhole organizations as Theory X or Theory Y.However, if one observes organizations more closely, one willfind evidence for another kind of typology based on a combinationof the task to be done <strong>and</strong> the occupational reference groups involved(Schein, 1996a). One can think of these as generic subculturesthat every group or organization needs in order to survive. Theproblem is that in many organizations these subcultures conflict

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!