12.07.2015 Views

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144 <strong>ORGANIZATIONAL</strong> <strong>CULTURE</strong> AND LEADERSHIPcausal cultural paradigms. In the low-context, unidirectional culture,events have clear universal meanings; in the high-context,mutual causality culture, events can be understood only in context,meanings can vary, categories can change, <strong>and</strong> causality cannot beunambiguously established.Though this distinction has more meaning when one comparescountries or large ethnic units, it has utility for organizations as well.For example, DEC was a high-context culture in which the meaningof words <strong>and</strong> actions depended on who was speaking <strong>and</strong> underwhat conditions. Managers knew each other well <strong>and</strong> always tookinto account who the actors were. When a senior manager wasobserved publicly punishing a subordinate for doing something“dumb,” this sometimes simply meant that the subordinate shouldhave gotten buy-in from a few more people before going off on hisown. Ciba-Geigy, by contrast, was a low-context culture in whichmessages tended to have the same meaning no matter whom theywere coming from. To be labeled “dumb” at Ciba-Geigy would havebeen a severe negative judgment.When we refer to “language,” we often overlook the role of context.We assume that when one has learned the language of anothercountry, one will be able to underst<strong>and</strong> what is going on <strong>and</strong> takeaction. But as we know all too well from our own cross-culturaltravel experiences, language is embedded in a wider context inwhich nonverbal cues, tone of voice, body language, <strong>and</strong> other signalsdetermine the true meaning of what is said. A vivid examplefrom my own experience was the previously cited senior managementmeeting of the British oil company at which I thought Iobserved polite explanations from the chairman, only to be told laterthat he had never been more brutal than he was at that meeting.Moralism-PragmatismA useful dimension for comparing groups on their approach to realitytesting is an adaptation of Engl<strong>and</strong>’s (1975) moralism-pragmatismscale. In his study of managerial values, Engl<strong>and</strong> found that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!