12.07.2015 Views

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118 <strong>ORGANIZATIONAL</strong> <strong>CULTURE</strong> AND LEADERSHIPcame from a scientific background, highlighting the assumptionthat if one is to succeed in the company, one must underst<strong>and</strong> thescientific base on which it was built. Having an advanced degree,such as a doctorate, was a distinct advantage even if one was beinghired into a marketing or managerial job.Both DEC <strong>and</strong> Ciba-Geigy had difficulty hiring <strong>and</strong> absorbingwhat they called MBAs, by which they meant all-purpose generalistswho do not have a solid technical or scientific background <strong>and</strong>who might be more concerned with personal ambition than contributingto the technical work of the organization. Behind theseperceptions lay the further assumption (at both of these companies)that general management, though necessary, was not the key to success.Scientific <strong>and</strong> technical know-how was essential. These assumptionshad a powerful impact on DEC’s ability to develop indifferent directions <strong>and</strong> to divisionalize, because there was always ashortage of experienced general managers.Who is in <strong>and</strong> who is out not only applies to the initial hiringdecision but continues to have important symbolic meaning as oneprogresses in the group. One of the immediate consequences ofdefining who is in <strong>and</strong> who is out is that differential treatment rulesbegin to be applied. Insiders get special benefits, are trusted more,get higher basic rewards, <strong>and</strong> most important, get a sense of identityfrom belonging to a defined organization. Outsiders not only getfewer of the various benefits <strong>and</strong> rewards but, more important, losespecific identity. They become part of a mass that is simply labeled“outsiders” <strong>and</strong> they are more likely to be stereotyped <strong>and</strong> treatedwith indifference or hostility.Organizations can be thought of, then, as involving three dimensionsof career movement: (1) lateral movement from one taskor function to another, (2) vertical movement from one rank toanother, <strong>and</strong> (3) inclusionary movement from outsider to insider(Schein, 1978, 1987b). Consensus forms around criteria not onlyfor promotion but also for inclusionary movement. As one movesfarther “in,” one becomes privy to some of the more secret assumptionsof the group. One learns the special meanings attached to cer-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!