12.07.2015 Views

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HOW <strong>CULTURE</strong> CHANGES 299In that case the process worked to make Ciba-Geigy both more marketingoriented <strong>and</strong> more strategically focused on pharmaceuticals,ultimately resulting in the merger with S<strong>and</strong>oz to create Novartis.Filling key positions with people who have the beliefs, values, <strong>and</strong>assumptions that are viewed by senior leaders as the necessary onesfor the future growth <strong>and</strong> survival of the organization is, in fact, thecommonest culture change mechanism observed.Transition to Midlife: Problems of SuccessionThe succession from founders <strong>and</strong> owning families to midlife undergeneral managers often involves many substages <strong>and</strong> processes.There are so many ways in which companies actually move frombeing under the domination of a founder or a founding family to astate of being managed by second-, third-, <strong>and</strong> fourth-generationgeneral managers that one can only identify a few prototypical processes<strong>and</strong> events.The first <strong>and</strong> often most critical of these processes is the shift fromfounder to a second-generation chief executive officer. Even if thatperson is the founder’s son or daughter or another trusted familymember, it is in the nature of founders <strong>and</strong> entrepreneurs to have difficultygiving up what they have created (Dyer, 1986, 1989; Schein,1978; Watson <strong>and</strong> Petre, 1990). During the transition phase, conflictsover which elements of the culture employees like or do not likebecome surrogates for what they do or do not like about the founder,since most of the culture is likely to be a reflection of the founder’spersonality. Battles develop between “conservatives” who like thefounding culture <strong>and</strong> “liberals” or “radicals” who want to change theculture, partly because they want to enhance their own power position.The danger in this situation is that feelings about the founderare projected onto the culture, <strong>and</strong>, in the effort to displace thefounder, much of the culture comes under challenge. If members ofthe organization forget that the culture is a set of learned solutionsthat have produced success, comfort, <strong>and</strong> identity, they may try tochange the very things they value <strong>and</strong> need.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!