12.07.2015 Views

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN NATURE, ACTIVITY, AND RELATIONSHIPS 173self-actualizers who need challenge <strong>and</strong> interesting work to provideself-confirmation <strong>and</strong> valid outlets for the full use of their talents(Argyris, 1964). Motivation theorists, such as Maslow (1954), organizedthese vying assumptions into a hierarchy: if the individual isin a survival mode, economic motives will dominate; if survivalneeds are met, social needs come to the fore; if social needs are met,self-actualization needs are released.McGregor (1960) observed that within this broad framework animportant second layer of assumptions was held by managers vis-àvisemployees. Ineffective managers tended to hold an interlockedset of assumptions that McGregor labeled Theory X. Theory X managersassumed that people are lazy <strong>and</strong> must therefore be motivatedwith economic incentives <strong>and</strong> controlled by constant surveillance.In contrast, effective managers held a different set of assumptionsthat he labeled Theory Y. These managers assumed that people arebasically self-motivated <strong>and</strong> therefore need to be challenged <strong>and</strong>channeled, not controlled. McGregor <strong>and</strong> other researchers sawinsufficient financial incentives as “demotivators” but observed thatadding financial incentives would not increase motivation. Onlychallenge <strong>and</strong> use of one’s talents could increase motivation (Herzberg,1968). Whereas Theory X assumes that employees are intrinsicallyin conflict with their employing organization, Theory Yassumes that it is possible to design organizations that make it possiblefor employee needs to be congruent with organizational needs.Most current theories are built on still another set of assumptions,namely, that human nature is complex <strong>and</strong> malleable <strong>and</strong>that one cannot make a universal statement about human nature;instead, one must be prepared for human variability. Such variabilitywill reflect (1) changes in the life cycle in that motives maychange <strong>and</strong> grow as we mature <strong>and</strong> (2) changes in social conditionsin that we are capable of learning new motives as may be requiredby new situations (Schein, 1978, 1990). Such variability makes itessential for organizations to develop some consensus on what theirown assumptions are, because management strategies <strong>and</strong> practicesreflect those assumptions. Both the incentive <strong>and</strong> control systems

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!