12.07.2015 Views

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CULTURE</strong>S IN ORGANIZATIONS 47st<strong>and</strong> why there was simultaneously intense conflict—with authorityfigures, insubordination, <strong>and</strong> bad-mouthing of bosses—<strong>and</strong>intense loyalty to the organization <strong>and</strong> personal affection acrosshierarchical boundaries, without also underst<strong>and</strong>ing the fifth interlockingassumption:5. We are one family whose members will take care of eachother (implying that no matter how much of a troublemakerone was in the decision process, one was valued in the family<strong>and</strong> could not be kicked out of it).It is only when one grasps these first five assumptions that onecan underst<strong>and</strong>, for example, why my initial interventions of tryingto get the group to be “nicer” to each other in the communicationprocess were politely ignored. I was seeing the group’s “effectiveness”in terms of my values <strong>and</strong> assumptions of how a “good” groupshould act. The DEC senior management committee was trying toreach “truth” <strong>and</strong> make valid decisions in the only way they knewhow <strong>and</strong> by a process that they believed in. The group was merelya means to an end; the real process going on in the group was abasic, deep search for solutions in which they could have confidencebecause they stood up even after intense debate.Once I shifted my focus to helping them in this search for validsolutions, I figured out what kinds of interventions would be more relevant<strong>and</strong> I found that the group accepted them more readily. Forexample, I began to emphasize agenda setting, time management,clarifying some of the debate, summarizing, consensus testing oncedebate was running dry, <strong>and</strong> in other ways focused more on the taskprocess rather than the interpersonal process. The interrupting, theemotional conflicts, <strong>and</strong> the other behavior I observed initially continued,but the group became more effective in its h<strong>and</strong>ling of information<strong>and</strong> in reaching consensus. It was in this context that Igradually developed the philosophy of being a “process consultant”instead of trying to be an expert on how groups should work (Schein,1969, 1988, 1999a, 2003).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!