64 SABMiller plc <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2012</strong>Corporate governance continuedThe nomination committee has continued to evaluate the balance ofskills, knowledge and experience of the board and remains committedto the progressive renewal of the board through orderly succession.Where vacancies arise they prepare a description of the role andcapabilities required for the appointment. Appropriate successionplans for the non-executive directors, for the executive directorsand for senior management were also kept under close review.The committee is conscious of the need for due regard to be givento diversity when considering appointments to the board. Five of thelast seven independent non-executive directors to be appointed bythe board were women, and currently one-third of the company’sindependent non-executive directors are women, and the committeetherefore believes that the company is well positioned in terms of thefuture balance of the board.Where non-executive vacancies arise, the committee may use theservices of external consultants in order to identify suitable candidatesfor the board to consider. In relation to the most recent non-executiveboard appointments, an external search firm was retained andproduced a strong list of candidates, who were then shortlisted forconsideration by the nomination committee on the basis of theirrelevant corporate or professional skills and experience, from whichMs Knox and Ms Weir were appointed in May 2011.An external search firm was not used in relation to the appointmentof Mr Mackay as Executive Chairman or Dr Clark as Chief OperatingOfficer. The process followed in connection with these appointmentsis described above. Mr Manser chaired the nomination committeeduring its deliberations on the appointment of Mr Mackay as thesuccessor to Mr Kahn as chairman.The remuneration committeeDuring the year, the remuneration committee consisted entirelyof independent directors: Mr Morland (Chairman), Mr Armour,Mr Manzoni and Mr Manser. Ms Knox was appointed to theremuneration committee with effect from 19 May 2011.The committee is responsible for the assessment and approval ofa broad remuneration strategy for the group and for the operationof the company’s share-based incentive plans. This includesdetermination of short-term and long-term incentives for executivesacross the group, and the committee is empowered by the board toset short-term and long-term remuneration for the executive directorsand members of the executive committee.The remuneration committee has implemented its strategy of ensuringthat employees and executives are rewarded for their contribution tothe group’s operating and financial performance at levels which takeaccount of industry, market and country benchmarks. To ensure thatthe executives’ goals are aligned to those of the company, shareincentives are considered to be critical elements of executive incentivepay. During the year the committee engaged the services ofconsultants, Kepler Associates. These consultants have no otherconnection with the company. At levels below the company’sexecutive committee, the company’s management engages otherconsultants, on a project basis.Specifically, during the year the work of the remuneration committeeincluded:• reviewing trends in global executive remuneration and governance;• reviewing the key elements and design of the group’s long-termincentive schemes (including peer comparator group composition);• reviewing global benchmarking methodologies and outcomes;• reviewing and approving performance hurdles for short andlong-term incentive awards;• reviewing and approving long-term incentive awards for executivecommittee members and other senior employees;• reviewing executive director shareholding guidelines;• reviewing and approving total remuneration for the executivedirectors and executive committee members;• determining the appropriate remuneration for the newly appointedexecutive director (Mr Wilson as Chief Financial Officer) and excommember (Mr De Lorenzo, as Director of Corporate Finance andDevelopment); and• reviewing and approving the directors’ remuneration report andrecommending it to the board.More details of the company’s remuneration policy and the workof the remuneration committee can be found in the directors’remuneration report on pages 68 to 83.The corporate accountability and risk assurancecommittee (CARAC)Dr Moyo chaired the committee throughout the year. Mr Kahn,Mr Mackay, Mr Manser, Mr Manzoni, Mr Pieterse and Mr Ramaphosaserved as members for the entire period. Mr Willard, who has servedthe committee since September 2009, stepped down from thecommittee on 7 September 2011 as a result of new commitmentsin his role as Chief Financial Officer of Altria. Mr Wyman ceased to bea member of the committee on his retirement from the board in July2011 and was replaced by Mr Wilson. Mr Pieterse will cease to be amember of the committee on his retirement in July <strong>2012</strong> and Mr Biblewill join the committee. Additionally, the Director of Corporate Affairs,Ms Clark, met regularly with the chairman of CARAC to discussimplementation and planning issues, and attended all meetingsof the committee.The objective of the committee is to assist the board in the dischargeof its responsibilities in relation to corporate accountability, includingsustainable development, corporate social responsibility, corporatesocial investment and ethical commercial behaviour. More detailsof the committee’s activities can be found in the sustainabledevelopment review section of this report and in the company’sseparate Sustainable Development <strong>Report</strong>, which is available onthe company’s website and, upon request, in hard copy.During the year the committee continued to focus on companyspecificand industry issues which are critical to protecting thecompany’s licence to operate.The disclosure committeeThe disclosure committee consists of the Chairman, the ChiefExecutive, the Chief Financial Officer, the Senior IndependentDirector and the General Counsel and Company Secretary orthe Deputy Company Secretary. The function of the disclosurecommittee, in accordance with the group’s inside information policy,is to meet as and when required in order to assure compliance withthe Disclosure and Transparency Rules and the Listing Rules, asguided by the General Counsel, and to ensure that the routes ofcommunication between excom members, the disclosure committee,the General Counsel’s office, the company secretarial office andinvestor relations are clear, and provide for rapid escalation to thedisclosure committee and key advisers, and the board, of anydecision regarding potential inside information, so that the companyis able to comply fully with its continuing obligations under theDisclosure and Transparency Rules and the Listing Rules.
SABMiller plc <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2012</strong> 65AccountabilityThe audit committeeA description of the composition, scope of responsibilities and workundertaken by the audit committee during the year is included in thesection dealing with the board and its committees.Relationship with auditorsPricewaterhouseCoopers were appointed as auditors of the companyon 8 February 1999, subsequently becoming PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP (PwC) in 2003.The company has in place a formal policy on auditor independenceand non-audit services, with which the external auditors are requiredto comply, to ensure that the independence of the auditors is notimpaired by the nature of non-audit work. The policy stipulates workwhich is permitted or not permitted to be performed by the auditors,and provides for appropriate approval and oversight processes.As a further safeguard, PwC confirm in a formal report to the auditcommittee that processes to ensure compliance with this policy arein place and that these processes are monitored regularly. This reportincludes a statement that, in their opinion, PwC believe that the natureof their non-audit services has not impaired their independence asauditors. Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements has abreakdown of non-audit services provided to the group by theauditors for the year under review.The audit committee is satisfied that, for the period under review, theindependence of the auditors has not been affected by the provisionof non-audit services. Fees in respect of non-audit services providedby PwC were primarily related to services relating to corporate financetransactions, taxation and our major business capability programme.In December 2010, the FRC issued revised Guidance on AuditCommittees as part of the new UK Corporate Governance Codeand, as a consequence, the audit committee reviewed and revisedthe group’s policy on auditor independence and non-audit services.A new policy was adopted with effect from 1 April 2011 whichclassifies all non-audit services into audit related services (beingthose services which are effectively required by law or regulation),and other non-audit services, and provides that engagements forother non-audit services are subject to formal pre-approval limits,either by the full audit committee or by the chairman of the auditcommittee, depending on the quantum, and that all requests forapproval be accompanied by a detailed justification as to why theappointment of the external auditors to provide the services is in thebest interests of the company, and how auditor independence isproposed to be safeguarded in connection with the provision of thoseservices. In the instances where approval was sought for the auditorsto provide non-audit services the committee concluded that theauditors’ detailed understanding of our group and ability to deliverservices in a timely fashion provided a cost-effective method ofdelivery without compromising auditor independence.The committee has a formal system for the review of the effectivenessof the external auditors. This process involves the external auditorspresenting to the committee their proposed audit strategy followedby the output of their initial discussions with management. At the auditcommittee meeting in May, the external auditors present the outputof their detailed year-end work. In making its assessment of externalauditor effectiveness, the committee reviews the audit engagementletters before signature by management, reviews the external auditors’summary of group and subsidiary issues and management’sresponse to the summary, and conducts an overall review of theeffectiveness of the external audit process and the external auditors.This review is facilitated by the use of templates that rate effectivenessacross 18 key criteria. Following the review, the committee makes arecommendation to the board on the reappointment of the externalauditors by the shareholders. The committee has not adopted a policyon tendering frequency since it prefers to conduct an annualassessment of the auditors’ effectiveness. There are no contractualobligations restricting the company’s choice of external auditor.Risk managementThe group’s risk management system is subject to regular review toensure compliance with the Code and the Turnbull Guidance (2005)on internal control and risk management.Risk and the board of directorsThe directors are ultimately responsible for the group’s riskmanagement system and for reviewing its effectiveness. There is aregular schedule for the board to consider the group’s significant risksand mitigating actions. The risk management system is designed tomanage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve businessobjectives and there is an ongoing process in place for identifying,assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting on the significant risksfaced by individual group companies and by the group as a whole.This process has been in place for the year under review up to theapproval of the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> and Accounts. The principal risks anduncertainties facing the group are set out on pages 22 and 23.Executive committeeExcom has specific responsibility as the risk management committeefor the group’s system of risk management. Excom reviews thegroup’s significant risks and subsequently reports to the boardon material changes and the associated mitigating actions.In accordance with the Turnbull Guidance, reviews on theeffectiveness of the risk management system were carried out byexcom, as the risk management committee, in April and October 2011and in April <strong>2012</strong>.Enterprise-wide risk managementExcom views the careful and appropriate management of risk as a keymanagement role. Managing business risk to deliver opportunities isa key element of all our business activities, and is undertaken usinga practical and flexible framework which provides a consistent andsustained approach to risk evaluation. Business risks, which maybe strategic, operational, financial or environmental, or concern thegroup’s reputation, are understood and visible. The business contextdetermines in each situation the level of acceptable risk and controls.The group continues to seek improvement in the management of riskby sharing best practice throughout the organisation.Key features of the group’s system of risk management are:• group statements on strategic direction, ethics and values;• clear business objectives and business principles;• an established risk policy;• a continuing process for identification and evaluation of significantrisks to the achievement of business objectives;• management processes in place to mitigate significant risks to anacceptable level;• ongoing monitoring of significant risks and internal and externalenvironmental factors that may change the group’s risk profile; and• a regular review by the group of both the type and amount ofexternal insurance that it buys, bearing in mind the availability ofsuch cover, its cost and the likelihood and magnitude of the risksinvolved.In addition to excom’s bi-annual reports to the board on key risks,there is a process of regular reporting to the board through theaudit committee on the status of the risk management process.Our approach was strengthened during 2010 by further integratingstrategic planning, internal audit and other risk control specialists intoline management’s risk processes and simplifying risk reporting, andthis process of gradual refinement and strengthening has continuedduring this year.Key reports include those that identify, assess and monitor strategicand operational risks in each division and on a group basis.Overview Business review Governance Financial statements Shareholder information