12.07.2015 Views

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONSTANTIN IORDACHInational Congress of Great European Powers that took place in June 1878in Berlin. Nevertheless, the Treaty of Berlin stipulated that Romania mustcede Southern Bessarabia to Russia (Art. 45), receiving instead theprovince of Northern Dobrogea (Art. 46).The decisions of the Berlin Congress opened a second phase ofresistance to Dobrogea’s annexation, by dividing <strong>Romanian</strong> politiciansbetween “pro-Dobrogeans <strong>and</strong> anti-Dobrogeans.” 17 Considering thatresistance to the European decision would be “political suicide,” the mostimportant political personalities of Romania, such as Prince Carol I,Prime Minister Ion. C. Brãtianu <strong>and</strong> Foreign Minister Mihail Kogãlniceanufavored compliance with the Berlin Treaty <strong>and</strong> the annexation ofDobrogea. 18 By contrast, other leading politicians, such as Dimitrie A.Sturdza, Nicolae Dimancea, <strong>and</strong> Petre P. Carp continued to oppose theannexation. Under their influence, on 28 June 1878, a resolution of theChamber of Deputies, voted by 46 deputies, firmly rejected the annexationof Dobrogea under any circumstances, considering it “detrimental toRomania’s interest.” 19 In their view, Dobrogea was “a fatal gift,” whoseacquisition would dismember the Latin ethnic homogeneity of the <strong>Romanian</strong>people, embroil Romania within Russia’s geo-political plans in theBalkans, deteriorate the diplomatic relations with Serbia <strong>and</strong> Bulgaria,<strong>and</strong> require an unreasonable financial sacrifice. Adversaries of the annexationemployed an impressive range of arguments against Dobrogea, portrayingthe population of the province as “an assemblage of most turbulentelements, gathered there from all over the world,” <strong>and</strong> characterizingthe province as “a marshy country, in which yellow fever is endemic,” <strong>and</strong>the organization of which would prove “the ruin of our finance.” 20A substantial nationalist concern with regard to Dobrogea’s annexationwas the ethnic <strong>and</strong> religious diversity of its population. The provincewas a “micro-cosmos of all religions:” 21 together with <strong>Romanian</strong>s, Bulgarians<strong>and</strong> Greeks of Orthodox Christian denomination <strong>and</strong> the RussianOld Believers, there were also numerous Muslims, Jews, Catholics <strong>and</strong>Protestants. In Romania, the existence of an overwhelming OrthodoxChristian majority, coupled with the tradition of the old treaties (capitulations)allegedly concluded between the Principalities of Moldavia <strong>and</strong>Wallachia <strong>and</strong> the Ottoman Empire, which forbade the practice of Muslimreligion on <strong>Romanian</strong> territory, favored a legal association between<strong>Romanian</strong> national identity <strong>and</strong> Christianity. 22 This principle was legallyconsecrated by Article 7 of the 1866 Constitution of Romania, which readthat: “Only foreigners of Christian denomination can acquire naturalization.”From a legal point of view, the potential contradiction betweenRomania’s legislation <strong>and</strong> Dobrogea’s religious composition was partiallyliquidated just one year after the annexation of Dobrogea. Following126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!