12.07.2015 Views

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Dislocated Transylvanian <strong>Hungarian</strong> Student BodyTABLE 4. Distribution of the Kolozsvár <strong>and</strong> Budapest Student Bodies AmongFaculties in the 1913-1914 Academic Year (Except for Theology in Budapest<strong>and</strong> the Natural Sciences Faculty in Kolozsvár).University Faculty Number of studentsPercentage of facultyin the totalof UniversityKolozsvár, 1913-1914Budapest, 1920-1921Law 1,202 59.0Medicine 530 26.0Arts 178 8.7Pharmacology 125 6.1Law 3,046 41.2Medicine 2,994 40.5Arts 1,100 14.8Pharmacology 252 3.4Source: Magyar statisztikai évkönyv, 1914, p. 290.ing, almost twice as large than that in the arts, <strong>and</strong> a much lower preferencefor economics than the average of refugees.The absolute numbers taken separately, the 1,997 students listed in1920-1921 as refugees from Transylvania present the following distributionamong branches of study: 6.7% (135) studied economics, while 60.5%(1,249) were students of “classical” departments. Of the latter, 62.3% (779)studied medicine, 26.5% (331) studied law, <strong>and</strong> 11.1% (139) were arts students.Compared to the 1913-1914 Kolozsvár contingent, the proportionalshare of law students was less than one-half, while that of medical studentsmore than doubled. Adding the 30.3% (606) of students listed in the technicaldepartments, <strong>and</strong> the 6.7% (135) of economy-students (out of the totalof 1,997), it is evident that the academic orientation of the 1920-1921 Transylvanianrefugee contingent was somewhat lagging behind the average<strong>Hungarian</strong> academic market of the period. 27The academic retrenchment of the dislocated students did alter thesocial composition of the student body to the detriment of those witha social background other than the “historic middle class.” (In 1914, 16%189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!