12.07.2015 Views

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IRINA CULICthe protection of their interests <strong>and</strong> provision of particular rights. Yet,these interests are expressed <strong>and</strong> represented by the political <strong>and</strong> culturalelites of the <strong>Hungarian</strong> minority in Romania (Transylvania). Obviously,there is a homology between the politics pursued by Budapest <strong>and</strong> thedynamics of the <strong>Hungarian</strong> minority elite in Romania. Thus, the “civic”identity of the <strong>Hungarian</strong>s in Romania is substantially influenced by thepositions taken by the <strong>Romanian</strong> state in devising <strong>and</strong> implementing legislationwith respect to national minorities, local administration, <strong>and</strong>education; by the positions taken by the <strong>Hungarian</strong> state expressed inthe degree <strong>and</strong> form of responsibility assumed for the ethnonational kinabroad; <strong>and</strong> by the relations between the two states. The <strong>Hungarian</strong>s inRomania tend to be dissatisfied <strong>and</strong> frustrated by their membership inthe <strong>Romanian</strong> polity, as the data in Table 1 suggests.TABLE 1. Degrees of agreement with the following statement: “I would ratherbe a <strong>Romanian</strong> citizen than a citizen of any other country”.<strong>Romanian</strong>s<strong>Hungarian</strong>sFully agree 57.2% 21.5%Rather agree 19.8% 21.1%Rather disagree 14.1% 22.7%Fully disagree 5.6% 29.6%Don’t know 3.3% 5.1%TOTAL 100% 100%Source: Irina Culic, István Horváth <strong>and</strong> Marius Lazãr, Ethnobarometer: Interethnic Relationsin Romania (Cluj-Napoca: Research Center for Interethnic Relations – CCRIT,2000). R<strong>and</strong>om multi-cluster multi-stratified samples for the <strong>Romanian</strong> population,N=1253 <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Hungarian</strong> population, N=798. In the national weighted sample, the<strong>Hungarian</strong>s were 10 times over-represented, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Romanian</strong>s from Szeklerl<strong>and</strong> were57 times over-represented. 22There are several reasons behind these responses. However, the<strong>Hungarian</strong>s’ institutional situation as a national minority in Romania isonly a minor reason. The <strong>Hungarian</strong>s in Romania currently enjoy mostcultural rights. 23 In Marshall’s terms of citizenship, 24 <strong>Hungarian</strong>s enjoythe same membership in the political community as <strong>Romanian</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> theireconomic situation is not different from that of the <strong>Romanian</strong>s. 25 Anyactual disadvantage arises as a result of contextual factors such as ethnicdistribution in a specific locality, but this holds true for <strong>Romanian</strong>s aswell. 26 There are more important reasons, in my opinion, that account forthe <strong>Hungarian</strong>s’ dissatisfaction with <strong>Romanian</strong> citizenship. The frustratingexperience of <strong>Hungarian</strong>s traveling abroad as <strong>Romanian</strong> citizens –identified, labeled <strong>and</strong> treated as “<strong>Romanian</strong>s” – is particularly illustra-232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!